Literature DB >> 16922064

The dynamic nature of speech perception.

James M McQueen1, Dennis Norris, Anne Cutler.   

Abstract

The speech perception system must be flexible in responding to the variability in speech sounds caused by differences among speakers and by language change over the lifespan of the listener. Indeed, listeners use lexical knowledge phonetic to retune perception of novel speech (Norris, McQueen, & Cutler, 2003). In categorization that study, Dutch listeners made lexical decisions to spoken stimuli, including words with an ambiguous fricative (between [f] and [s]), in either [f]- or speech [s]-biased lexical contexts. In a subsequent categorization test, the former perception group of listeners identified more sounds on an [epsilonf]-[epsilons] continuum as [f] than the latter group. In the present experiment, listeners received the same exposure and test stimuli, but did not make lexical decisions to the exposure items. Instead, they counted them. Categorization results were indistinguishable from those obtained earlier. These adjustments in fricative perception therefore do not depend on explicit judgments during exposure. This learning effect thus reflects automatic retuning of the interpretation of acoustic-phonetic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16922064     DOI: 10.1177/00238309060490010601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  10 in total

1.  Lexically guided perceptual learning is robust to task-based changes in listening strategy.

Authors:  Julia R Drouin; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Lexically guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Perceptual learning of multiple talkers: Determinants, characteristics, and limitations.

Authors:  Shawn N Cummings; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Perceptual learning of speech under optimal and adverse conditions.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Contextual Effects on the Perception of Duration.

Authors:  John Kingston; Shigeto Kawahara; Della Chambless; Daniel Mash; Eve Brenner-Alsop
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2009-07

6.  Boosting lexical support does not enhance lexically guided perceptual learning.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; James S Magnuson; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Tolerance for inconsistency in foreign-accented speech.

Authors:  Marijt J Witteman; Andrea Weber; James M McQueen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

8.  Perceptual learning of multiple talkers requires additional exposure.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; Hannah Mechtenberg; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.157

9.  Converging toward a common speech code: imitative and perceptuo-motor recalibration processes in speech production.

Authors:  Marc Sato; Krystyna Grabski; Maëva Garnier; Lionel Granjon; Jean-Luc Schwartz; Noël Nguyen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-11

10.  Benefits of fading in perceptual learning are driven by more than dimensional attention.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Milen L Radell; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.