Literature DB >> 22004192

Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning.

Kaori Idemaru1, Lori L Holt.   

Abstract

Speech processing requires sensitivity to long-term regularities of the native language yet demands listeners to flexibly adapt to perturbations that arise from talker idiosyncrasies such as nonnative accent. The present experiments investigate whether listeners exhibit dimension-based statistical learning of correlations between acoustic dimensions defining perceptual space for a given speech segment. While engaged in a word recognition task guided by a perceptually unambiguous voice-onset time (VOT) acoustics to signal beer, pier, deer, or tear, listeners were exposed incidentally to an artificial "accent" deviating from English norms in its correlation of the pitch onset of the following vowel (F0) to VOT. Results across four experiments are indicative of rapid, dimension-based statistical learning; reliance on the F0 dimension in word recognition was rapidly down-weighted in response to the perturbation of the correlation between F0 and VOT dimensions. However, listeners did not simply mirror the short-term input statistics. Instead, response patterns were consistent with a lingering influence of sensitivity to the long-term regularities of English. This suggests that the very acoustic dimensions defining perceptual space are not fixed and, rather, are dynamically and rapidly adjusted to the idiosyncrasies of local experience, such as might arise from nonnative-accent, dialect, or dysarthria. The current findings extend demonstrations of "object-based" statistical learning across speech segments to include incidental, online statistical learning of regularities residing within a speech segment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22004192      PMCID: PMC3285244          DOI: 10.1037/a0025641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  39 in total

1.  Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization.

Authors:  Lori L Holt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-04

2.  Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The weckud wetch of the wast: lexical adaptation to a novel accent.

Authors:  Jessica Maye; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-05

4.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling.

Authors:  P Iverson; P K Kuhl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The perception of lenis and fortis plosives in French. A critical re-evaluation.

Authors:  K J Kohler
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  The influence of spectral distinctiveness on acoustic cue weighting in children's and adults' speech perception.

Authors:  Catherine Mayo; Alice Turk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Discovering functional units in continuous speech.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Lim; Francisco Lacerda; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Multidimensional visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Phillip J Isola; Brian J Scholl; Teresa A Treat
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Are there really interactive processes in speech perception?

Authors:  James M McQueen; Dennis Norris; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  37 in total

1.  The developmental trajectory of children's perception and production of English /r/-/l/.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual Learning of Intonation Contour Categories in Adults and 9- to 11-Year-Old Children: Adults Are More Narrow-Minded.

Authors:  Vsevolod Kapatsinski; Paul Olejarczuk; Melissa A Redford
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-02-22

Review 3.  Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  A second chance for a first impression: Sensitivity to cumulative input statistics for lexically guided perceptual learning.

Authors:  Christina Y Tzeng; Lynne C Nygaard; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-14

5.  Individual differences in categorical perception of speech: Cue weighting and executive function.

Authors:  Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2016-09-23

6.  Simultaneous tracking of coevolving distributional regularities in speech.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Dimension-Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production.

Authors:  Matthew Lehet; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-25

8.  Infants' selective use of reliable cues in multidimensional language input.

Authors:  Christine E Potter; Casey Lew-Williams
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2018-10-04

9.  Dimension-based statistical learning of vowels.

Authors:  Ran Liu; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Distributional learning for speech reflects cumulative exposure to a talker's phonetic distributions.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Nicholas R Monto
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.