Literature DB >> 24364708

Specificity of dimension-based statistical learning in word recognition.

Kaori Idemaru1, Lori L Holt2.   

Abstract

Speech perception flexibly adapts to short-term regularities of ambient speech input. Recent research demonstrates that the function of an acoustic dimension for speech categorization at a given time is relative to its relationship to the evolving distribution of dimensional regularity across time, and not simply to a fixed value along the dimension. Two experiments examine the nature of this dimension-based statistical learning in online word recognition, testing generalization of learning across phonetic categories. While engaged in a word recognition task guided by perceptually unambiguous voice-onset time (VOT) acoustics signaling stop voicing in either bilabial rhymes, beer and pier, or alveolar rhymes, deer and tear, listeners were exposed incidentally to an artificial "accent" deviating from English norms in its correlation of the pitch onset of the following vowel (F0) with VOT (Experiment 1). Exposure to the change in the correlation of F0 with VOT led listeners to down-weight reliance on F0 in voicing categorization, indicating dimension-based statistical learning. This learning was observed only for the "accented" contrast varying in its F0/VOT relationship during exposure; learning did not generalize to the other place of articulation. Another group of listeners experienced competing F0/VOT correlations across place of articulation such that the global correlation for voicing was stable, but locally correlations across voicing pairs were opposing (e.g., "accented" beer and pier, "canonical" deer and tear, Experiment 2). Listeners showed dimension-based learning only for the accented pair, not the canonical pair, indicating that they are able to track separate acoustic statistics across place of articulation, that is, for /b-p/ and /d-t/. This suggests that dimension-based learning does not operate obligatorily at the phonological level of stop voicing. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24364708      PMCID: PMC4241634          DOI: 10.1037/a0035269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  27 in total

1.  A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes.

Authors:  Paul Iverson; Patricia K Kuhl; Reiko Akahane-Yamada; Eugen Diesch; Yoh'ich Tohkura; Andreas Kettermann; Claudia Siebert
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-02

2.  The effects of experimental variables on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese listeners.

Authors:  R A Yamada; Y Tohkura
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

3.  Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  An interactive Hebbian account of lexically guided tuning of speech perception.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James L McClelland; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

5.  The developmental trajectory of children's perception and production of English /r/-/l/.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of Attention on the Strength of Lexical Influences on Speech Perception: Behavioral Experiments and Computational Mechanisms.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James L McClelland; Lori L Holt; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-03

7.  Language experience modulates weighting of acoustic cues for vowel perception: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Silvia C Lipski; Paola Escudero; Titia Benders
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Pitch as a voicing cue.

Authors:  M Haggard; S Ambler; M Callow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination.

Authors:  Jessica Maye; Janet F Werker; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-01

10.  Visual recalibration and selective adaptation in auditory-visual speech perception: Contrasting build-up courses.

Authors:  Jean Vroomen; Sabine van Linden; Béatrice de Gelder; Paul Bertelson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  12 in total

1.  Bias in the perception of phonetic detail in children's speech: A comparison of categorical and continuous rating scales.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Sarah K Schellinger; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.346

Review 2.  Dimension-selective attention as a possible driver of dynamic, context-dependent re-weighting in speech processing.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Adam T Tierney; Giada Guerra; Aeron Laffere; Frederic Dick
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Short-term perceptual reweighting in suprasegmental categorization.

Authors:  Kyle Jasmin; Adam Tierney; Chisom Obasih; Lori Holt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-08-01

4.  Perceptual learning of multiple talkers: Determinants, characteristics, and limitations.

Authors:  Shawn N Cummings; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.157

Review 5.  Non-sensory Influences on Auditory Learning and Plasticity.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Max F K Happel; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Pablo Ripollés; Sarah M Keesom; Laura M Hurley; Luke Remage-Healey; Lori L Holt; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-02

6.  Long-term priors constrain category learning in the context of short-term statistical regularities.

Authors:  Casey L Roark; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-05-06

7.  Simultaneous tracking of coevolving distributional regularities in speech.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Dimension-Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production.

Authors:  Matthew Lehet; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-25

9.  Dimension-based statistical learning of vowels.

Authors:  Ran Liu; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Varying acoustic-phonemic ambiguity reveals that talker normalization is obligatory in speech processing.

Authors:  Ja Young Choi; Elly R Hu; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.