Literature DB >> 20046904

Perceptual normalization for speaking rate III: Effects of the rate of one voice on perception of another.

Rochelle S Newman1, James R Sawusch.   

Abstract

Individuals vary their speaking rate, and listeners use the speaking rate of precursor sentences to adjust for these changes (Kidd, 1989). Most of the research on this adjustment process has focused on situations in which there was only a single stream of speech over which such perceptual adjustment could occur. Yet listeners are often faced with environments in which multiple people are speaking simultaneously. Each of these voices provides speaking rate information. The challenge for the listener is to determine which sources of information should apply in a speech perception situation. Three studies examined when listeners would use rate information from one voice to adjust their perception of another voice. Results suggested that if only one source of duration information was available, listeners used that information, regardless of the speaker or the speaker's spatial location. When multiple sources were available, listeners primarily used information from the same source as the target item. However, even information from a source that differed in both location and talker still influenced perception to a slight degree.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20046904      PMCID: PMC2782831          DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phon        ISSN: 0095-4470


  39 in total

1.  Perceptual normalization for speaking rate. II: Effects of signal discontinuities.

Authors:  J R Sawusch; R S Newman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

2.  Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Rhodri Cusack; John Deeks; Genevieve Aikman; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Automaticity and the detection of speech.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; J R Sawusch; L F Garrison
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-01

5.  Perceptual effects of preceding nonspeech rate on temporal properties of speech categories.

Authors:  Travis Wade; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-08

Review 6.  Toward a neurophysiological theory of auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Spectral discontinuities and the vowel length effect.

Authors:  A J Lotto; K R Kluender; K P Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-10

8.  Stimulus variability and spoken word recognition. II. The effects of age and hearing impairment.

Authors:  M S Sommers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

Authors:  W F Ganong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Some experiments on the sound of silence in phonetic perception.

Authors:  M F Dorman; L J Raphael; A M Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Speech Rate Normalization and Phonemic Boundary Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Lexically guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Accounting for rate-dependent category boundary shifts in speech perception.

Authors:  Hans Rutger Bosker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Encoding speech rate in challenging listening conditions: White noise and reverberation.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Hans Rutger Bosker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Temporal contrast effects in human speech perception are immune to selective attention.

Authors:  Hans Rutger Bosker; Matthias J Sjerps; Eva Reinisch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Listening to yourself is special: Evidence from global speech rate tracking.

Authors:  Merel Maslowski; Antje S Meyer; Hans Rutger Bosker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.