Literature DB >> 23996069

The radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.

Jerry Yongqiang Chen1, Seng Jin Yeo, Andy Khye Soon Yew, Darren Keng Jin Tay, Shi-Lu Chia, Ngai Nung Lo, Pak Lin Chin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the post-operative radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) surgery versus conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled for a primary TKA were prospectively divided into PSI or conventional technique. Coronal and sagittal radiographic long limb films were taken post-operatively. The accepted values for normal alignment were 180° ± 3° for hip-knee-ankle angle; 90° ± 3° for coronal femoral component angle or coronal tibia component angle; 0° to 3° flexion for sagittal femoral component angle and 0° to 7° posterior slope for sagittal tibia component angle.
RESULTS: For hip-knee-ankle angle, there were 21 % more outliers in the PSI group compared to the conventional group (p = 0.045). Most of these outliers had valgus deformity in the PSI group and varus deformity in the conventional group (p = 0.045). For implant placement, there was no difference in the proportion of outliers between the two groups. There was also no difference in the duration of surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that PSI surgery is associated with a larger proportion of outliers for lower limb alignment. PSI surgery as an alternative to conventional TKA is not advisable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23996069     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2638-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  25 in total

1.  Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Lawrence Joseph; David J Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality.

Authors:  Donald G Eckhoff; Joel M Bach; Victor M Spitzer; Karl D Reinig; Michelle M Bagur; Todd H Baldini; Nicolas M P Flannery
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Difference between the epicondylar and cylindrical axis of the knee.

Authors:  Donald Eckhoff; Craig Hogan; Laura DiMatteo; Mitch Robinson; Joel Bach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pak Lin Chin; Leon Siang Shen Foo; Kuang Ying Yang; Seng Jin Yeo; Ngai Nung Lo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

6.  Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Bauwens; Gerrit Matthes; Michael Wich; Florian Gebhard; Beate Hanson; Axel Ekkernkamp; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Reliability of lower extremity alignment measurement using radiographs and PACS.

Authors:  R G Marx; P Grimm; K A Lillemoe; C M Robertson; O R Ayeni; S Lyman; E A Bogner; H Pavlov
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation.

Authors:  Fabio Conteduca; Raffaele Iorio; Daniele Mazza; Ludovico Caperna; Gabriele Bolle; Giuseppe Argento; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Jinjun Zhu; Erin L Ruh; Stephen M Howell; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The axes of rotation of the knee.

Authors:  A M Hollister; S Jatana; A K Singh; W W Sullivan; A G Lupichuk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  37 in total

1.  Morphological evaluation of the sagittal plane femoral load-bearing surface in computer-simulated virtual total knee arthroplasty implantation at different flexion angles.

Authors:  Shichang Chen; Yiming Zeng; Mengning Yan; Bing Yue; Jun Zhang; You Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  No difference in mechanical alignment and femoral component placement between patient-specific instrumentation and conventional instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Huichao Fu; Jiaxing Wang; Shenyuan Zhou; Tao Cheng; Wen Zhang; Qi Wang; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tilman Pfitzner; Matthew P Abdel; Philipp von Roth; Carsten Perka; Hagen Hommel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Design improvement in patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty improved the accuracy of the tibial prosthetic alignment in the coronal and axial planes.

Authors:  Kazumasa Yamamura; Yukihide Minoda; Ryo Sugama; Yoichi Ohta; Suguru Nakamura; Hideki Ueyama; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Evaluation of the accuracy of resected bone thickness based on patient-specific instrumentation during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazumasa Yamamura; Fumiaki Inori; Sadahiko Konishi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Bone-femoral component interface gap after sagittal mechanical axis alignment is filled with new bone after cementless total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shinichi Kuriyama; Katsufumi Hyakuna; Satoshi Inoue; Yasutsugu Kawai; Yasuyuki Tamaki; Hiromu Ito; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Custom cutting guides in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Morad Chughtai; Anton Khlopas; Iyooh U Davidson; George A Yakubek; Kim L Stearns; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-05

Review 8.  Evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Etienne Cavaignac; Regis Pailhé; Gregoire Laumond; Jérôme Murgier; Nicolas Reina; Jean Michel Laffosse; Emilie Bérard; Philippe Chiron
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Computerized tomography based "patient specific blocks" improve postoperative mechanical alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Vipul Vijay; Vikas P Birla; Amit K Agarwal
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-18

10.  Effects of total knee arthroplasty on ankle alignment in patients with varus gonarthrosis: Do we sacrifice ankle to the knee?

Authors:  Sarper Gursu; Hakan Sofu; Peter Verdonk; Vedat Sahin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.