Shichang Chen1, Yiming Zeng1, Mengning Yan1, Bing Yue1, Jun Zhang1, You Wang2. 1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China. 2. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China. drwangyou@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the effect of implantation of the femoral component of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system in 0°, 3°, and 6° of flexion on the sagittal plane morphology of the femoral load-bearing surfaces. It was hypothesized that increasing the flexion angle would result in undersizing of the anterior surface without changing the flexion gap. METHODS: Computer simulation of a TKA using three-dimensional models of 10 healthy knees, matched to three different sized femoral components. Size discrepancy in the sagittal plane anterior, distal, and posterior joint surfaces between the native and prosthetic knees was calculated at 0°, 3°, and 6° of flexion. RESULTS: The required component size varied with the angle of implantation: 0°, size 3/size 4 (N = 7/3), 3°, size 3 (N = 10); and 6°, size 2/size 3 (N = 4/6). Component undersizing ranged between 4.4-6.3 mm at the anterior lateral surface, with a significant difference between 0° and 6° (p < 0.05), and 1.2-3.5 mm at the anterior medial surface. Component oversizing of the distal surface of the lateral condyle (2.9 mm) and undersizing of the medial surface of the posterior condyle (1.6-2.3 mm) were comparable at all three flexion angles of component implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the flexion angle of implantation increased the incidence of using a smaller size of femoral component without significant interference with the flexion gap. However, the effect of a smaller femoral component on undersizing of the anterior surface of the condyle and the impact on the extensor mechanism need to be considered.
PURPOSE: To examine the effect of implantation of the femoral component of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system in 0°, 3°, and 6° of flexion on the sagittal plane morphology of the femoral load-bearing surfaces. It was hypothesized that increasing the flexion angle would result in undersizing of the anterior surface without changing the flexion gap. METHODS: Computer simulation of a TKA using three-dimensional models of 10 healthy knees, matched to three different sized femoral components. Size discrepancy in the sagittal plane anterior, distal, and posterior joint surfaces between the native and prosthetic knees was calculated at 0°, 3°, and 6° of flexion. RESULTS: The required component size varied with the angle of implantation: 0°, size 3/size 4 (N = 7/3), 3°, size 3 (N = 10); and 6°, size 2/size 3 (N = 4/6). Component undersizing ranged between 4.4-6.3 mm at the anterior lateral surface, with a significant difference between 0° and 6° (p < 0.05), and 1.2-3.5 mm at the anterior medial surface. Component oversizing of the distal surface of the lateral condyle (2.9 mm) and undersizing of the medial surface of the posterior condyle (1.6-2.3 mm) were comparable at all three flexion angles of component implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the flexion angle of implantation increased the incidence of using a smaller size of femoral component without significant interference with the flexion gap. However, the effect of a smaller femoral component on undersizing of the anterior surface of the condyle and the impact on the extensor mechanism need to be considered.
Entities:
Keywords:
Computer-simulation; Femoral component; Implant flexion; Morphometry; Total knee arthroplasty
Authors: Merrill A Ritter; Leesa D Harty; Kenneth E Davis; John B Meding; Michael E Berend Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: K M Ghosh; A M Merican; F Iranpour; D J Deehan; Andrew A Amis Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2009-06-13 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: E Grant Sutter; Margaret R Widmyer; Gangadhar M Utturkar; Charles E Spritzer; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Marco A Marra; Marta Strzelczak; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Sebastiaan A W van de Groes; Dennis Janssen; Bart F J M Koopman; Nico Verdonschot; Ate B Wymenga Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 4.342