Literature DB >> 23862816

Predictions of diotic tone-in-noise detection based on a nonlinear optimal combination of energy, envelope, and fine-structure cues.

Junwen Mao1, Azadeh Vosoughi, Laurel H Carney.   

Abstract

Tone-in-noise detection has been studied for decades; however, it is not completely understood what cue or cues are used by listeners for this task. Model predictions based on energy in the critical band are generally more successful than those based on temporal cues, except when the energy cue is not available. Nevertheless, neither energy nor temporal cues can explain the predictable variance for all listeners. In this study, it was hypothesized that better predictions of listeners' detection performance could be obtained using a nonlinear combination of energy and temporal cues, even when the energy cue was not available. The combination of different cues was achieved using the logarithmic likelihood-ratio test (LRT), an optimal detector in signal detection theory. A nonlinear LRT-based combination of cues was proposed, given that the cues have Gaussian distributions and the covariance matrices of cue values from noise-alone and tone-plus-noise conditions are different. Predictions of listeners' detection performance for three different sets of reproducible noises were computed with the proposed model. Results showed that predictions for hit rates approached the predictable variance for all three datasets, even when an energy cue was not available.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23862816      PMCID: PMC3724726          DOI: 10.1121/1.4807815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Intensity discrimination and detection of amplitude modulation.

Authors:  M Wojtczak; N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. I. Model structure.

Authors:  J Breebaart; S van de Par; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relation of masked threshold to signal-duration for various interaural phasecombinations.

Authors:  H C BLODGETT; L A JEFFRESS; R W TAYLOR
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1958-03

4.  A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers. III. Monaural and diotic detection and model results.

Authors:  Sean A Davidson; Robert H Gilkey; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Diotic and dichotic detection with reproducible chimeric stimuli.

Authors:  Sean A Davidson; Robert H Gilkey; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  An evaluation of models for diotic and dichotic detection in reproducible noises.

Authors:  Sean A Davidson; Robert H Gilkey; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. II. Simulations and measurements.

Authors:  T Dau; D Püschel; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. I. Model structure.

Authors:  T Dau; D Püschel; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A phenomenological model of the synapse between the inner hair cell and auditory nerve: long-term adaptation with power-law dynamics.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce; Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  14 in total

1.  Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.

Authors:  U-Cheng Leong; Douglas M Schwarz; Kenneth S Henry; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Suboptimal use of neural information in a mammalian auditory system.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Muhammad S A Zilany; Nicholas J Huang; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Kelly-Jo Koch; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-15

4.  Tone-in-noise detection using envelope cues: comparison of signal-processing-based and physiological models.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-30

5.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers. IV. Models using interaural time, level, and envelope differences.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Neural fluctuation cues for simultaneous notched-noise masking and profile-analysis tasks: Insights from model midbrain responses.

Authors:  Braden N Maxwell; Virginia M Richards; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Normal Tone-In-Noise Sensitivity in Trained Budgerigars despite Substantial Auditory-Nerve Injury: No Evidence of Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Identifying cues for tone-in-noise detection using decision variable correlation in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Supra-Threshold Hearing and Fluctuation Profiles: Implications for Sensorineural and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

10.  No Effect of Musical Training on Frequency Selectivity Estimated Using Three Methods.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Jie Wan; Ajanth Varathanathan; Sophie Naddell; Thomas Baer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.