Literature DB >> 31081487

No Effect of Musical Training on Frequency Selectivity Estimated Using Three Methods.

Brian C J Moore1, Jie Wan1,2, Ajanth Varathanathan1, Sophie Naddell1, Thomas Baer1.   

Abstract

It is widely believed that the frequency selectivity of the auditory system is largely determined by processes occurring in the cochlea. If so, musical training would not be expected to influence frequency selectivity. Consistent with this, auditory filter shapes for low center frequencies do not differ for musicians and nonmusicians. However, it has been reported that psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) at 4000 Hz were sharper for musicians than for nonmusicians. This study explored the origin of the discrepancy across studies. Frequency selectivity was estimated for musicians and nonmusicians using three methods: fast PTCs with a masker that swept in frequency, "traditional" PTCs obtained using several fixed masker center frequencies, and the notched-noise method. The signal frequency was 4000 Hz. The data were fitted assuming that each side of the auditory filter had the shape of a rounded-exponential function. The sharpness of the auditory filters, estimated as the Q10 values, did not differ significantly between musicians and nonmusicians for any of the methods, but detection efficiency tended to be higher for the musicians. This is consistent with the idea that musicianship influences auditory proficiency but does not influence the peripheral processes that determine the frequency selectivity of the auditory system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory filter; frequency selectivity; musicianship; notched-noise method; psychophysical tuning curve

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31081487      PMCID: PMC6535760          DOI: 10.1177/2331216519841980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Hear        ISSN: 2331-2165            Impact factor:   3.293


  32 in total

1.  The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects.

Authors:  Karolina Kluk; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Karine Delhommeau; Xavier Perrot; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  "Suppression" effects in forward masking.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Psychophysical auditory filter estimates reveal sharper cochlear tuning in musicians.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jonathan M Schug; Skyler G Jennings; Shaum P Bhagat
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Off-frequency listening: effects on psychoacoustical tuning curves obtained in simultaneous and forward masking.

Authors:  B J O'Loughlin; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold.

Authors:  R D Patterson; I Nimmo-Smith; D L Weber; R Milroy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Implementation of a fast method for measuring psychophysical tuning curves.

Authors:  Aleksander Sęk; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Musicianship enhances ipsilateral and contralateral efferent gain control to the cochlea.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Amy D Schneider; Victoria R Heitzmann; Shaum P Bhagat
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The danger of using narrow-band noise maskers to measure "suppression".

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  No Influence of Musicianship on the Effect of Contralateral Stimulation on Frequency Selectivity.

Authors:  Emilia Tarnowska; Andrzej Wicher; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 2.  The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.974

3.  A specific relationship between musical sophistication and auditory working memory.

Authors:  Meher Lad; Alexander J Billig; Sukhbinder Kumar; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Effect of Musical Experience on Cochlear Frequency Resolution: An Estimation of PTCs, DLF and SOAEs.

Authors:  Konika Kakar; J Prajna Bhat; Suresh Thontadarya
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.017

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.