Literature DB >> 8655794

A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. II. Simulations and measurements.

T Dau1, D Püschel, A Kohlrausch.   

Abstract

This and the accompanying paper [Dau et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 3615-3622 (1996)] describe a quantitative model for signal processing in the auditory system. The model combines several stages of preprocessing with a decision device that has the properties of an optimal detector. The present paper compares model predictions for a variety of experimental conditions with the performance of human observers. Simulated and psychophysically determined thresholds were estimated with a three-interval forced-choice adaptive procedure. All model parameters were kept constant for all simulations discussed in this paper. For frozen-noise maskers, the effects of the following stimulus parameters were examined: signal frequency, signal phase, temporal position and duration of the signal within the masker under conditions of simultaneous masking, masker level, and masker duration under conditions of forward masking, and backward masking. The influence of signal phase and the temporal position of the signal, including positions at masker onset, was determined for a random-noise masker and compared with corresponding results obtained for a frozen noise. The model describes all the experimental data with an accuracy of a few dB with the following exceptions: forward-masked thresholds obtained with brief maskers are too high and the change in threshold with a change in signal duration is too small. Both discrepancies have their origin in the adaptation stages in the preprocessing part of the model. On the basis of the wide range of simulated conditions we conclude that the present model is a successful approach to describing the detection process in the human auditory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8655794     DOI: 10.1121/1.414960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  A unifying basis of auditory thresholds based on temporal summation.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

3.  The effect of narrow-band noise maskers on increment detection.

Authors:  Jessica J Messersmith; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The role of suppression in the upward spread of masking.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

5.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: the effects of hearing loss on temporal integration reconsidered.

Authors:  Heinrich Neubauer; Peter Heil
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

6.  Statistical analyses of temporal information in auditory brainstem responses to tones in noise: correlation index and spike-distance metric.

Authors:  Yan Gai; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-06

7.  Predictions of diotic tone-in-noise detection based on a nonlinear optimal combination of energy, envelope, and fine-structure cues.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Azadeh Vosoughi; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Andreu Paredes Gallardo; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Diotic and dichotic detection with reproducible chimeric stimuli.

Authors:  Sean A Davidson; Robert H Gilkey; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  An evaluation of models for diotic and dichotic detection in reproducible noises.

Authors:  Sean A Davidson; Robert H Gilkey; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.