Literature DB >> 10530016

Intensity discrimination and detection of amplitude modulation.

M Wojtczak1, N F Viemeister.   

Abstract

Thresholds for detection of low-rate sinusoidal amplitude modulation and for detection of intensity increments were measured over a wide range of levels in an examination of the relationship between these fundamental aspects of intensity processing. As expected, thresholds measured with a continuous 1-kHz tone decrease with increasing carrier/pedestal level. For levels between 6 and 85 dB SPL the data are well described by 10 log delta I/I = 0.44.(20 log m) + D(fm), where delta I/I is the Weber fraction for increment detection, m is the modulation index at threshold, and D(fm) depends on modulation rate (fm). The relationship between the psychometric functions for modulation and increment detection is also consistent with this equation. The data indicate a clear relationship between modulation and increment detection and thus provide an important additional consideration for models of modulation processing. No existing models provide an adequate account of this relationship.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10530016     DOI: 10.1121/1.427940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  The effect of carrier level on tuning in amplitude-modulation masking.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of narrow-band noise maskers on increment detection.

Authors:  Jessica J Messersmith; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

4.  Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Stephan D Ewert; Laurel H Carney; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Predictions of diotic tone-in-noise detection based on a nonlinear optimal combination of energy, envelope, and fine-structure cues.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Azadeh Vosoughi; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Psychophysically based site selection coupled with dichotic stimulation improves speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perception of suprathreshold amplitude modulation and intensity increments: Weber's law revisited.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of external noise on detection of intensity increments.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Kim S Schairer; Lance Nizami; Samar Khaddam; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  On the mechanisms involved in the recovery of envelope information from temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Rebecca E Millman; Neal F Viemeister; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Acoustic temporal modulation detection in normal-hearing and cochlear implanted listeners: effects of hearing mechanism and development.

Authors:  Min-Hyun Park; Jong Ho Won; David L Horn; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.