Literature DB >> 19813803

Diotic and dichotic detection with reproducible chimeric stimuli.

Sean A Davidson1, Robert H Gilkey, H Steven Colburn, Laurel H Carney.   

Abstract

Subject responses were measured for individual narrow-band reproducible stimuli in a low-frequency tone-in-noise detection task. Both N0S0 and N0Spi conditions were examined. The goal of the experiment was to determine the relative importance of envelope and fine-structure cues. Therefore, chimeric stimuli were generated by recombining envelopes and fine structures from different reproducible stimuli. Detection judgments for noise-alone or tone-plus-noise stimuli that had common envelopes but different fine structures or common fine structures but different envelopes were compared. The results showed similar patterns of responses to stimuli that shared envelopes, indicating the importance of envelope cues; however, fine-structure cues were also shown to be important. The relative weight assigned to envelope and fine-structure cues varied across subjects and across interaural conditions. The results also indicated that envelope and fine-structure information are not processed independently. Implications for monaural and binaural models of masking are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19813803      PMCID: PMC2771054          DOI: 10.1121/1.3203996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  The contribution of static and dynamically varying ITDs and IIDs to binaural detection.

Authors:  J Breebaart; S van de Par; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers. III. Monaural and diotic detection and model results.

Authors:  Sean A Davidson; Robert H Gilkey; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. III. Narrowband experiments and binaural models.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat.

Authors:  P X Joris; T C Yin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The influence of stimulus envelope and fine structure on the binaural masking level difference.

Authors:  D A Eddins; L E Barber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Diotic and dichotic detection using multiplied-noise maskers.

Authors:  S van de Par; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Binaural processing of noisy stimuli: internal/external noise ratios for diotic and dichotic stimuli.

Authors:  R A Siegel; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Some physical and psychological effects produced by selective delays of the envelope of narrow bands of noise.

Authors:  C A Amenta; C Trahiotis; L R Bernstein; J M Nuetzel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Effective properties of multicomponent simultaneous maskers under conditions of uncertainty.

Authors:  D L Neff; B P Callaghan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of masker waveform and signal-to-masker phase relation on diotic and dichotic masking by reproducible noise.

Authors:  R H Gilkey; D E Robinson; T E Hanna
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Predictions of diotic tone-in-noise detection based on a nonlinear optimal combination of energy, envelope, and fine-structure cues.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Azadeh Vosoughi; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  An evaluation of models for diotic and dichotic detection in reproducible noises.

Authors:  Sean A Davidson; Robert H Gilkey; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Suboptimal use of neural information in a mammalian auditory system.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Muhammad S A Zilany; Nicholas J Huang; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Kelly-Jo Koch; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-15

5.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers. IV. Models using interaural time, level, and envelope differences.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Uncertain Emotion Discrimination Differences Between Musicians and Non-musicians Is Determined by Fine Structure Association: Hilbert Transform Psychophysics.

Authors:  Francis A M Manno; Raul R Cruces; Condon Lau; Fernando A Barrios
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.