Literature DB >> 25266265

Tone-in-noise detection using envelope cues: comparison of signal-processing-based and physiological models.

Junwen Mao1, Laurel H Carney.   

Abstract

Tone-in-noise detection tasks with reproducible noise maskers have been used to identify cues that listeners use to detect signals in noisy environments. Previous studies have shown that energy, envelope, and fine-structure cues are significantly correlated to listeners' performance for detection of a 500-Hz tone in noise. In this study, envelope cues were examined for both diotic and dichotic tone-in-noise detection using both stimulus-based signal processing and physiological models. For stimulus-based envelope cues, a modified envelope slope model was used for the diotic condition and the binaural slope of the interaural envelope difference model for the dichotic condition. Stimulus-based models do not include key nonlinear transformations in the auditory periphery such as compression, rate and dynamic range adaptation, and rate saturation, all of which affect the encoding of the stimulus envelope. For physiological envelope cues, stimuli were passed through models for the auditory nerve (AN), cochlear nucleus, and inferior colliculus (IC). The AN and cochlear nucleus models included appropriate modulation gain, another transformation of the stimulus envelope that is not typically included in stimulus-based models. A model IC cell was simulated with a linear band-pass modulation filter. The average discharge rate and response fluctuations of the model IC cell were compared to human performance. Previous studies have predicted a significant amount of the variance across reproducible noise maskers in listeners' detection using stimulus-based envelope cues. In this study, a physiological model that includes neural mechanisms that affect encoding of the stimulus envelope predicts a similar amount of the variance in listeners' performance across noise maskers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25266265      PMCID: PMC4310857          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0489-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  30 in total

1.  A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers. III. Monaural and diotic detection and model results.

Authors:  Sean A Davidson; Robert H Gilkey; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal measures and neural strategies for detection of tones in noise based on responses in anteroventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Yan Gai; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural rate and timing cues for detection and discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones in the awake rabbit inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. III. Narrowband experiments and binaural models.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Influence of inhibitory inputs on rate and timing of responses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Yan Gai; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  An evaluation of models for diotic and dichotic detection in reproducible noises.

Authors:  Sean A Davidson; Robert H Gilkey; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Modeling auditory-nerve responses for high sound pressure levels in the normal and impaired auditory periphery.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A phenomenological model of the synapse between the inner hair cell and auditory nerve: long-term adaptation with power-law dynamics.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce; Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Representation of the vowel /epsilon/ in normal and impaired auditory nerve fibers: model predictions of responses in cats.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  13 in total

1.  Temporal weighting of binaural information at low frequencies: Discrimination of dynamic interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Anna C Diedesch; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.

Authors:  U-Cheng Leong; Douglas M Schwarz; Kenneth S Henry; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Kelly-Jo Koch; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-15

4.  Modeling Responses in the Superior Paraolivary Nucleus: Implications for Forward Masking in the Inferior Colliculus.

Authors:  Nima Salimi; Muhammad S A Zilany; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-17

5.  Masking of short tones in noise: Evidence for envelope-based, rather than energy-based detection.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jessica Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Midbrain Synchrony to Envelope Structure Supports Behavioral Sensitivity to Single-Formant Vowel-Like Sounds in Noise.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams; Johanna Forst; Matthew J Mender; Erikson G Neilans; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-20

7.  Normal Tone-In-Noise Sensitivity in Trained Budgerigars despite Substantial Auditory-Nerve Injury: No Evidence of Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Identifying cues for tone-in-noise detection using decision variable correlation in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Spectral and Temporal Envelope Cues for Human and Automatic Speech Recognition in Noise.

Authors:  Guangxin Hu; Sarah C Determan; Yue Dong; Alec T Beeve; Joshua E Collins; Yan Gai
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-22

Review 10.  Supra-Threshold Hearing and Fluctuation Profiles: Implications for Sensorineural and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.