Literature DB >> 23858425

Results from the New Jersey statewide critical congenital heart defects screening program.

Lorraine F Garg1, Kim Van Naarden Braun, Mary M Knapp, Terry M Anderson, Robert I Koppel, Daniel Hirsch, Leslie M Beres, Joseph Sweatlock, Richard S Olney, Jill Glidewell, Cynthia F Hinton, Alex R Kemper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: New Jersey was the first state to implement legislatively mandated newborn pulse oximetry screening (POxS) in all licensed birthing facilities to detect critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs). The objective of this report was to evaluate implementation of New Jersey's statewide POxS mandate.
METHODS: A 2-pronged approach was used to collect data on infants screened in all New Jersey birthing facilities from August 31, 2011, through May 31, 2012. Aggregate screening results were submitted by each birthing facility. Data on failed screens and clinical characteristics of those newborns were reported to the New Jersey Birth Defects Registry (NJBDR). Three indicators were used to distinguish the added value of mandated POxS from standard clinical care: prenatal congenital heart defect diagnosis, cardiology consultation or echocardiogram indicated or performed before PoxS, or clinical findings at the time of POxS warranting a pulse oximetry measurement.
RESULTS: Of 75,324 live births in licensed New Jersey birthing facilities, 73,320 were eligible for screening, of which 99% were screened. Forty-nine infants with failed POxS were reported to the NJBDR, 30 of whom had diagnostic evaluations solely attributable to the mandated screening. Three of the 30 infants had previously unsuspected CCHDs and 17 had other diagnoses or non-CCHD echocardiogram findings.
CONCLUSIONS: In the first 9 months after implementation, New Jersey achieved a high statewide screening rate and established surveillance mechanisms to evaluate the unique contribution of POxS. The screening mandate identified 3 infants with previously unsuspected CCHDs that otherwise might have resulted in significant morbidity and mortality and also identified other significant secondary targets such as sepsis and pneumonia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congenital heart disease/defects; newborn screening; oximetry; surveillance and monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23858425      PMCID: PMC4471476          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-0269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  21 in total

1.  Evaluation of pulse oximetry screening in Middle Tennessee: cases for consideration before universal screening.

Authors:  W Walsh
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 2.  Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in asymptomatic newborn babies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shakila Thangaratinam; Kiritrea Brown; Javier Zamora; Khalid S Khan; Andrew K Ewer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  A public health economic assessment of hospitals' cost to screen newborns for critical congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Cora Peterson; Scott D Grosse; Jill Glidewell; Lorraine F Garg; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Mary M Knapp; Leslie M Beres; Cynthia F Hinton; Richard S Olney; Cynthia H Cassell
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Improved prenatal detection of congenital heart disease in an integrated health care system.

Authors:  Denis J Levy; Dolores H Pretorius; Abraham Rothman; Marcos Gonzales; Cherie Rao; Mark E Nunes; Julian Bendelstein; Karen Mehalek; Amy Thomas; Candace Nehlsen; Jessica Ehr; Raoul J Burchette; Mark S Sklansky
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 5.  Newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease: essential public health roles for birth defects monitoring programs.

Authors:  Richard S Olney; Lorenzo D Botto
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-11-27

6.  Temporal trends in survival among infants with critical congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Matthew E Oster; Kyung A Lee; Margaret A Honein; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Mikyong Shin; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; William T Mahle; Gerard R Martin; W Carl Cooley; Praveen Kumar; W Robert Morrow; Kellie Kelm; Gail D Pearson; Jill Glidewell; Scott D Grosse; R Rodney Howell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects in newborn infants (PulseOx): a test accuracy study.

Authors:  Andrew K Ewer; Lee J Middleton; Alexandra T Furmston; Abhay Bhoyar; Jane P Daniels; Shakila Thangaratinam; Jonathan J Deeks; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Feasibility of implementing pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart disease in a community hospital.

Authors:  E A Bradshaw; S Cuzzi; S C Kiernan; N Nagel; J A Becker; G R Martin
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Rapid implementation of pulse oximetry newborn screening to detect critical congenital heart defects - New Jersey, 2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Detection of critical congenital heart defects: Review of contributions from prenatal and newborn screening.

Authors:  Richard S Olney; Elizabeth C Ailes; Marci K Sontag
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  Universal pulse oximetry screen for critical congenital heart disease in the NICU.

Authors:  S Lakshminrusimha; D Sambalingam; V Carrion
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Critical Congenital Heart Disease Newborn Screening Implementation: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Monica R McClain; John S Hokanson; Regina Grazel; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Lorraine F Garg; Michelle R Morris; Kathleen Moline; Keri Urquhart; Amy Nance; Harper Randall; Marci K Sontag
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-06

4.  Estimated number of infants detected and missed by critical congenital heart defect screening.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Ailes; Suzanne M Gilboa; Margaret A Honein; Matthew E Oster
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Effect of newborn screening for critical CHD on healthcare utilisation.

Authors:  Rie Sakai-Bizmark; Hiraku Kumamaru; Eliza J Webber; Dennys Estevez; Laurie A Mena; Emily H Marr; Ruey-Kang R Chang
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.093

6.  Evaluation of a Screening Program to Detect Critical Congenital Heart Defects in Newborns.

Authors:  Rachel Klausner; Eugene D Shapiro; Robert W Elder; Eve Colson; Jaspreet Loyal
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2017-03-01

7.  Lessons Learned from Infants with Late Detection of Critical Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Gerard R Martin; Bryanna N Schwartz; Lisa A Hom; Mary T Donofrio
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Late detection of critical congenital heart disease among US infants: estimation of the potential impact of proposed universal screening using pulse oximetry.

Authors:  Cora Peterson; Elizabeth Ailes; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Matthew E Oster; Richard S Olney; Cynthia H Cassell; David E Fixler; Suzan L Carmichael; Gary M Shaw; Suzanne M Gilboa
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 16.193

9.  Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  E M Goetz; K M Magnuson; J C Eickhoff; M A Porte; J S Hokanson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  A comparison of retesting rates using alternative testing algorithms in the pilot implementation of critical congenital heart disease screening in Minnesota.

Authors:  Lazaros K Kochilas; Jeremiah S Menk; Annamarie Saarinen; Amy Gaviglio; Jamie L Lohr
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.