Literature DB >> 28092064

Critical Congenital Heart Disease Newborn Screening Implementation: Lessons Learned.

Monica R McClain1, John S Hokanson2, Regina Grazel3, Kim Van Naarden Braun4, Lorraine F Garg3, Michelle R Morris5, Kathleen Moline5, Keri Urquhart6, Amy Nance7, Harper Randall7, Marci K Sontag8.   

Abstract

Introduction The purpose of this article is to present the collective experiences of six federally-funded critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) newborn screening implementation projects to assist federal and state policy makers and public health to implement CCHD screening. Methods A qualitative assessment and summary from six demonstration project grantees and other state representatives involved in the implementation of CCHD screening programs are presented in the following areas: legislation, provider and family education, screening algorithms and interpretation, data collection and quality improvement, telemedicine, home and rural births, and neonatal intensive care unit populations. Results The most common challenges to implementation include: lack of uniform legislative and statutory mandates for screening programs, lack of funding/resources, difficulty in screening algorithm interpretation, limited availability of pediatric echocardiography, and integrating data collection and reporting with existing newborn screening systems. Identified solutions include: programs should consider integrating third party insurers and other partners early in the legislative/statutory process; development of visual tools and language modification to assist in the interpretation of algorithms, training programs for adult sonographers to perform neonatal echocardiography, building upon existing newborn screening systems, and using automated data transfer mechanisms. Discussion Continued and expanded surveillance, research, prevention and education efforts are needed to inform screening programs, with an aim to reduce morbidity, mortality and other adverse consequences for individuals and families affected by CCHD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical congenital heart disease; Newborn screening; Public health

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28092064      PMCID: PMC5663229          DOI: 10.1007/s10995-017-2273-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  20 in total

1.  Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; William T Mahle; Gerard R Martin; W Carl Cooley; Praveen Kumar; W Robert Morrow; Kellie Kelm; Gail D Pearson; Jill Glidewell; Scott D Grosse; R Rodney Howell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease in planned out-of-hospital births.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lhost; Elizabeth M Goetz; Jody D Belling; W Marijke van Roojen; Gretchen Spicer; John S Hokanson
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Results from the New Jersey statewide critical congenital heart defects screening program.

Authors:  Lorraine F Garg; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Mary M Knapp; Terry M Anderson; Robert I Koppel; Daniel Hirsch; Leslie M Beres; Joseph Sweatlock; Richard S Olney; Jill Glidewell; Cynthia F Hinton; Alex R Kemper
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Delayed diagnosis of congenital heart disease worsens preoperative condition and outcome of surgery in neonates.

Authors:  K L Brown; D A Ridout; A Hoskote; L Verhulst; M Ricci; C Bull
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Births: final data for 2012.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Michelle J K Osterman; Sally C Curtin; T J Matthews
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2013-12-30

6.  Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for critical congenital heart disease in US newborns.

Authors:  Cora Peterson; Scott D Grosse; Matthew E Oster; Richard S Olney; Cynthia H Cassell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Late detection of critical congenital heart disease among US infants: estimation of the potential impact of proposed universal screening using pulse oximetry.

Authors:  Cora Peterson; Elizabeth Ailes; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Matthew E Oster; Richard S Olney; Cynthia H Cassell; David E Fixler; Suzan L Carmichael; Gary M Shaw; Suzanne M Gilboa
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 16.193

8.  Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the AHA and AAP.

Authors:  William T Mahle; Jane W Newburger; G Paul Matherne; Frank C Smith; Tracey R Hoke; Robert Koppel; Samuel S Gidding; Robert H Beekman; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Delayed diagnosis of critical congenital heart defects: trends and associated factors.

Authors:  Rebecca F Liberman; Kelly D Getz; Angela E Lin; Cathleen A Higgins; Sepehr Sekhavat; Glenn R Markenson; Marlene Anderka
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  State Legislation, Regulations, and Hospital Guidelines for Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Defects - United States, 2011-2014.

Authors:  Jill Glidewell; Richard S Olney; Cynthia Hinton; Jim Pawelski; Marci Sontag; Thalia Wood; James E Kucik; Rachel Daskalov; Jeff Hudson
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-synthesis of policy intervention characteristics that influence the implementation of government-directed policy in the hospital setting: implications for infection prevention and control.

Authors:  Sally M Havers; Elizabeth Kate Martin; Andrew Wilson; Lisa Hall
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2020-05-04

2.  Evaluation of Circulating Cardiovascular Biomarker Levels for Early Detection of Congenital Heart Disease in Newborns in Sweden.

Authors:  Henning Clausen; Elisabeth Norén; Salla Valtonen; Aki Koivu; Mikko Sairanen; Petru Liuba
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-12-01

3.  Quality Improvement Interventions to Improve Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening.

Authors:  Lisa A Hom; Clarissa Chan Salcedo; Mary Revenis; Gerard R Martin
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2019-09-26

4.  Inadequacies of hospital-level critical congenital heart disease screening data reports: implications for research and quality efforts.

Authors:  Heather Siefkes; Laura R Kair; Annamarie Saarinen; Satyan Lakshminrusimha
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.521

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.