Literature DB >> 20508595

Evaluation of pulse oximetry screening in Middle Tennessee: cases for consideration before universal screening.

W Walsh1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pulse oximetry screening of asymptomatic newborns is suggested as a life-saving procedure for the timely detection of critical congenital heart disease (CHD) in asymptomatic newborns. We evaluated this screening and report cases that demonstrate problems with screening in a non-research setting. STUDY
DESIGN: An elective state-directed public health screening program was evaluated in Middle Tennessee; 14 564 infants were screened after 24 h of age and before discharge. The screening was performed in a non-research setting by nurses at the local hospitals. A parallel investigation of the methods and timing of diagnosis in Middle Tennessee revealed a surprisingly high incidence of antenatal diagnosis (66%). RESULT: Using a saturation value of 94% as the defined normal, the positive predictive value was less than 1%, with 112 infants having a false positive case and 1 having a true positive case identified (incidence 1/34 775). The one true positive case was not referred for evaluation. One false-positive case resulted in a costly referral and hospitalization. Antenatal diagnosis when combined with physical examination detected 43 of 44 infants with critical CHD during the year-long evaluation.
CONCLUSION: Before universal screening can be implemented, a system of care must be defined to address the educational and referral issues raised by this report.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20508595     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2010.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  11 in total

1.  A public health economic assessment of hospitals' cost to screen newborns for critical congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Cora Peterson; Scott D Grosse; Jill Glidewell; Lorraine F Garg; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Mary M Knapp; Leslie M Beres; Cynthia F Hinton; Richard S Olney; Cynthia H Cassell
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Estimated number of infants detected and missed by critical congenital heart defect screening.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Ailes; Suzanne M Gilboa; Margaret A Honein; Matthew E Oster
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Results from the New Jersey statewide critical congenital heart defects screening program.

Authors:  Lorraine F Garg; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Mary M Knapp; Terry M Anderson; Robert I Koppel; Daniel Hirsch; Leslie M Beres; Joseph Sweatlock; Richard S Olney; Jill Glidewell; Cynthia F Hinton; Alex R Kemper
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Evaluating the diagnostic gap: statewide incidence of undiagnosed critical congenital heart disease before newborn screening with pulse oximetry.

Authors:  Jessica H Mouledoux; William F Walsh
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Moving towards universal prenatal detection of critical congenital heart disease in southern Nevada: a community-wide program.

Authors:  William Evans; William Castillo; Robert Rollins; Carlos Luna; Katrinka Kip; Joseph Ludwick; Nitin Madan; Michael Ciccolo; Alvaro Galindo; Abraham Rothman; Gary Mayman; Kathleen Cass; Vincent Thomas; Humberto Restrepo; Ruben Acherman
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Late detection of critical congenital heart disease among US infants: estimation of the potential impact of proposed universal screening using pulse oximetry.

Authors:  Cora Peterson; Elizabeth Ailes; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Matthew E Oster; Richard S Olney; Cynthia H Cassell; David E Fixler; Suzan L Carmichael; Gary M Shaw; Suzanne M Gilboa
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Feasibility of implementing pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart disease in a community hospital.

Authors:  E A Bradshaw; S Cuzzi; S C Kiernan; N Nagel; J A Becker; G R Martin
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 8.  Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Maria N Plana; Javier Zamora; Gautham Suresh; Luis Fernandez-Pineda; Shakila Thangaratinam; Andrew K Ewer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-01

9.  Nordic pulse oximetry screening--implementation status and proposal for uniform guidelines.

Authors:  Anne de-Wahl Granelli; Alf Meberg; Tiina Ojala; Jesper Steensberg; Gylfi Oskarsson; Mats Mellander
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 2.299

10.  Assessment of current practices and feasibility of routine screening for critical congenital heart defects - Georgia, 2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 17.586

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.