W Walsh1. 1. Division of Neonatology, Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN 37232-9550, USA. bill.walsh@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pulse oximetry screening of asymptomatic newborns is suggested as a life-saving procedure for the timely detection of critical congenital heart disease (CHD) in asymptomatic newborns. We evaluated this screening and report cases that demonstrate problems with screening in a non-research setting. STUDY DESIGN: An elective state-directed public health screening program was evaluated in Middle Tennessee; 14 564 infants were screened after 24 h of age and before discharge. The screening was performed in a non-research setting by nurses at the local hospitals. A parallel investigation of the methods and timing of diagnosis in Middle Tennessee revealed a surprisingly high incidence of antenatal diagnosis (66%). RESULT: Using a saturation value of 94% as the defined normal, the positive predictive value was less than 1%, with 112 infants having a false positive case and 1 having a true positive case identified (incidence 1/34 775). The one true positive case was not referred for evaluation. One false-positive case resulted in a costly referral and hospitalization. Antenatal diagnosis when combined with physical examination detected 43 of 44 infants with critical CHD during the year-long evaluation. CONCLUSION: Before universal screening can be implemented, a system of care must be defined to address the educational and referral issues raised by this report.
OBJECTIVE: Pulse oximetry screening of asymptomatic newborns is suggested as a life-saving procedure for the timely detection of critical congenital heart disease (CHD) in asymptomatic newborns. We evaluated this screening and report cases that demonstrate problems with screening in a non-research setting. STUDY DESIGN: An elective state-directed public health screening program was evaluated in Middle Tennessee; 14 564 infants were screened after 24 h of age and before discharge. The screening was performed in a non-research setting by nurses at the local hospitals. A parallel investigation of the methods and timing of diagnosis in Middle Tennessee revealed a surprisingly high incidence of antenatal diagnosis (66%). RESULT: Using a saturation value of 94% as the defined normal, the positive predictive value was less than 1%, with 112 infants having a false positive case and 1 having a true positive case identified (incidence 1/34 775). The one true positive case was not referred for evaluation. One false-positive case resulted in a costly referral and hospitalization. Antenatal diagnosis when combined with physical examination detected 43 of 44 infants with critical CHD during the year-long evaluation. CONCLUSION: Before universal screening can be implemented, a system of care must be defined to address the educational and referral issues raised by this report.
Authors: Cora Peterson; Scott D Grosse; Jill Glidewell; Lorraine F Garg; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Mary M Knapp; Leslie M Beres; Cynthia F Hinton; Richard S Olney; Cynthia H Cassell Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Lorraine F Garg; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Mary M Knapp; Terry M Anderson; Robert I Koppel; Daniel Hirsch; Leslie M Beres; Joseph Sweatlock; Richard S Olney; Jill Glidewell; Cynthia F Hinton; Alex R Kemper Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: William Evans; William Castillo; Robert Rollins; Carlos Luna; Katrinka Kip; Joseph Ludwick; Nitin Madan; Michael Ciccolo; Alvaro Galindo; Abraham Rothman; Gary Mayman; Kathleen Cass; Vincent Thomas; Humberto Restrepo; Ruben Acherman Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Cora Peterson; Elizabeth Ailes; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Matthew E Oster; Richard S Olney; Cynthia H Cassell; David E Fixler; Suzan L Carmichael; Gary M Shaw; Suzanne M Gilboa Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Maria N Plana; Javier Zamora; Gautham Suresh; Luis Fernandez-Pineda; Shakila Thangaratinam; Andrew K Ewer Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-03-01