Literature DB >> 25979782

Detection of critical congenital heart defects: Review of contributions from prenatal and newborn screening.

Richard S Olney1, Elizabeth C Ailes2, Marci K Sontag3.   

Abstract

In 2011, statewide newborn screening programs for critical congenital heart defects began in the United States, and subsequently screening has been implemented widely. In this review, we focus on data reports and collection efforts related to both prenatal diagnosis and newborn screening. Defect-specific, maternal, and geographic factors are associated with variations in prenatal detection, so newborn screening provides a population-wide safety net for early diagnosis. A new web-based repository is collecting information on newborn screening program policies, quality indicators related to screening programs, and specific case-level data on infants with these defects. Birth defects surveillance programs also collect data about critical congenital heart defects, particularly related to diagnostic timing, mortality, and services. Individuals from state programs, federal agencies, and national organizations will be interested in these data to further refine algorithms for screening in normal newborn nurseries, neonatal intensive care settings, and other special populations; and ultimately to evaluate the impact of screening on outcomes. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital; Heart defects; Neonatal screening; Population surveillance; Prenatal diagnosis; Public health

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979782      PMCID: PMC4460982          DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  45 in total

1.  AIUM Practice Guideline for the performance of an antepartum obstetric ultrasound examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  National evaluation of US newborn screening system components.

Authors:  Bradford L Therrell; W Harry Hannon
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2006

3.  ACOG Practice Bulletin, clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists number 98, October 2008 (replaces Practice Bulletin number 58, December 2004). Ultrasonography in pregnancy.

Authors:  Alfred Z Abuhamad
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Failure to diagnose congenital heart disease in infancy.

Authors:  K S Kuehl; C A Loffredo; C Ferencz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Effectiveness of pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart disease in asymptomatic newborns.

Authors:  Robert I Koppel; Charlotte M Druschel; Tonia Carter; Barry E Goldberg; Prabhu N Mehta; Rohit Talwar; Fredrick Z Bierman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Genetic basis for congenital heart defects: current knowledge: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Authors:  Mary Ella Pierpont; Craig T Basson; D Woodrow Benson; Bruce D Gelb; Therese M Giglia; Elizabeth Goldmuntz; Glenn McGee; Craig A Sable; Deepak Srivastava; Catherine L Webb
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  The incidence of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Julien I E Hoffman; Samuel Kaplan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Prevalence of congenital heart defects in metropolitan Atlanta, 1998-2005.

Authors:  Mark D Reller; Matthew J Strickland; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; William T Mahle; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Long-term follow-up after diagnosis resulting from newborn screening: statement of the US Secretary of Health and Human Services' Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders and Genetic Diseases in Newborns and Children.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; Coleen A Boyle; Javier Aceves; Denise Dougherty; James Figge; Jill L Fisch; Alan R Hinman; Carol L Greene; Christopher A Kus; Julie Miller; Derek Robertson; Joseph Telfair; Brad Therrell; Michele Lloyd-Puryear; Peter C van Dyck; R Rodney Howell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Impact of pulse oximetry screening on the detection of duct dependent congenital heart disease: a Swedish prospective screening study in 39,821 newborns.

Authors:  Anne de-Wahl Granelli; Margareta Wennergren; Kenneth Sandberg; Mats Mellander; Carina Bejlum; Leif Inganäs; Monica Eriksson; Niklas Segerdahl; Annelie Agren; Britt-Marie Ekman-Joelsson; Jan Sunnegårdh; Mario Verdicchio; Ingegerd Ostman-Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-01-08
View more
  18 in total

1.  The association between natural gas well activity and specific congenital anomalies in Oklahoma, 1997-2009.

Authors:  Amanda E Janitz; Hanh Dung Dao; Janis E Campbell; Julie A Stoner; Jennifer D Peck
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Prenatal Detection of Congenital Heart Diseases Using Echocardiography: 12-Year Results of an Improving Program With 9782 Cases.

Authors:  Yanqiu Ou; Michael S Bloom; Jinzhuang Mai; Melissa Francois; Wei Pan; Xiaohua Xiao; Ximeng Wang; Zhiqiang Nie; Yanji Qu; Xiangmin Gao; Yong Wu; Xiaoqing Liu; Jian Zhuang; Jimei Chen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-13

3.  Impact of an electronic medical record-based automated screening program for critical congenital heart disease: Emirates Health Services, United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Sumaya Al Zarouni; Noor Majed Al Mheiri; Kalthoom Al Blooshi; Yousif Al Serkal; Neema Preman; Sadaf Ahsan Naqvi; Yasir Khan
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Distribution of congenital anomalies by race/ethnicity and geospatial location in Oklahoma, 1997-2009.

Authors:  Amanda E Janitz; Hanh Dung Dao; Janis E Campbell; Julie A Stoner; Jennifer D Peck
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Study of congenital heart defects among neonates in Jos, Nigeria: prevalence and spectrum.

Authors:  Olukemi O Ige; Tolulope O Afolanranmi; Christopher S Yilgwan; Fanen Ayatse; Esin Nkereuwem; Atiene S Sagay; Phyllis Kanki; Fidelia Bode-Thomas
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.167

Review 6.  Critical congenital heart disease screening.

Authors:  Mohammed A Chamsi-Pasha; Hassan Chamsi-Pasha
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

7.  Long-term early development research in congenital heart disease (LEADER-CHD): a study protocol for a prospective cohort observational study investigating the development of children after surgical correction for congenital heart defects during the first 3 years of life.

Authors:  Hannah Ferentzi; Constanze Pfitzer; Lisa-Maria Rosenthal; Felix Berger; Katharina R L Schmitt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Perinatal outcomes and congenital heart defect prognosis in 53313 non-selected perinatal infants.

Authors:  Donghua Xie; Hua Wang; Zhiyu Liu; Junqun Fang; Tubao Yang; Shujin Zhou; Aihua Wang; Jiabi Qin; Lili Xiong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Association between benzene and congenital anomalies in Oklahoma, 1997-2009.

Authors:  Amanda E Janitz; Hanh Dung Dao; Janis E Campbell; Julie A Stoner; Jennifer D Peck
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Congenital Heart Disease Requiring Maintenance of Ductus Arteriosus in Critically Ill Newborns Admitted at a Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Manuela Cucerea; Marta Simon; Elena Moldovan; Marcela Ungureanu; Raluca Marian; Laura Suciu
Journal:  J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures)       Date:  2016-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.