OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the trends in survival for infants with critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs) and to examine the potential impact of timing of diagnosis and other prognostic factors on survival. METHODS: We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study in infants born with structural congenital heart defects (CHDs) between 1979 and 2005 and ascertained by the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program. We estimated Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities for 12 CCHD phenotypes by birth era and timing of diagnosis among infants without noncardiac defects or chromosomal disorders and used stratified Cox proportional hazards models to assess potential prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of 1 056 541 births, there were 6965 infants with CHDs (1830 with CCHDs). One-year survival was 75.2% for those with CCHDs (n = 1336) vs 97.1% for those with noncritical CHDs (n = 3530; P < .001). One-year survival for infants with CCHDs improved from 67.4% for the 1979-1993 birth era to 82.5% for the 1994-2005 era (P < .001). One-year survival was 71.7% for infants with CCHDs diagnosed at ≤1 day of age (n = 890) vs 82.5% for those with CCHDs diagnosed at >1 day of age (n = 405; P < .001). There was a significantly higher risk of 1-year mortality for infants with an earlier birth era, earlier diagnosis, and low birth weight and whose mothers were <30 years old. CONCLUSIONS: One-year survival for infants with CCHDs has been improving over time, yet mortality remains high. Later diagnosis is associated with improved 1-year survival. These benchmark data and identified prognostic factors may aid future evaluations of the impact of pulse oximetry screening on survival from CCHDs.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the trends in survival for infants with critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs) and to examine the potential impact of timing of diagnosis and other prognostic factors on survival. METHODS: We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study in infants born with structural congenital heart defects (CHDs) between 1979 and 2005 and ascertained by the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program. We estimated Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities for 12 CCHD phenotypes by birth era and timing of diagnosis among infants without noncardiac defects or chromosomal disorders and used stratified Cox proportional hazards models to assess potential prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of 1 056 541 births, there were 6965 infants with CHDs (1830 with CCHDs). One-year survival was 75.2% for those with CCHDs (n = 1336) vs 97.1% for those with noncritical CHDs (n = 3530; P < .001). One-year survival for infants with CCHDs improved from 67.4% for the 1979-1993 birth era to 82.5% for the 1994-2005 era (P < .001). One-year survival was 71.7% for infants with CCHDs diagnosed at ≤1 day of age (n = 890) vs 82.5% for those with CCHDs diagnosed at >1 day of age (n = 405; P < .001). There was a significantly higher risk of 1-year mortality for infants with an earlier birth era, earlier diagnosis, and low birth weight and whose mothers were <30 years old. CONCLUSIONS: One-year survival for infants with CCHDs has been improving over time, yet mortality remains high. Later diagnosis is associated with improved 1-year survival. These benchmark data and identified prognostic factors may aid future evaluations of the impact of pulse oximetry screening on survival from CCHDs.
Authors: Adolfo Correa; Janet D Cragan; James E Kucik; Clinton J Alverson; Suzanne M Gilboa; Renu Balakrishnan; Matthew J Strickland; C Wes Duke; Leslie A O'Leary; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Csaba Siffel; Don Gambrell; Debra Thompson; Michael Atkinson; Jamuna Chitra Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2007-02
Authors: Mathieu Dehaes; Henry H Cheng; Erin M Buckley; Pei-Yi Lin; Silvina Ferradal; Kathryn Williams; Rutvi Vyas; Katherine Hagan; Daniel Wigmore; Erica McDavitt; Janet S Soul; Maria Angela Franceschini; Jane W Newburger; P Ellen Grant Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: L B DeVries; R J Heyne; C Ramaciotti; L S Brown; M A Jaleel; V S Kapadia; P J Burchfield; L P Brion Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Logan G Spector; Jeremiah S Menk; Jessica H Knight; Courtney McCracken; Amanda S Thomas; Jeffrey M Vinocur; Matthew E Oster; James D St Louis; James H Moller; Lazaros Kochilas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: J William Gaynor; Christian Stopp; David Wypij; Dean B Andropoulos; Joseph Atallah; Andrew M Atz; John Beca; Mary T Donofrio; Kim Duncan; Nancy S Ghanayem; Caren S Goldberg; Hedwig Hövels-Gürich; Fukiko Ichida; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Robert Justo; Beatrice Latal; Jennifer S Li; William T Mahle; Patrick S McQuillen; Shaji C Menon; Victoria L Pemberton; Nancy A Pike; Christian Pizarro; Lara S Shekerdemian; Anne Synnes; Ismee Williams; David C Bellinger; Jane W Newburger Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Andrew Autry; Hilda Razzaghi; Coleen A Boyle; William T Mahle; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Adolfo Correa Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 7.124