Literature DB >> 24493342

Late detection of critical congenital heart disease among US infants: estimation of the potential impact of proposed universal screening using pulse oximetry.

Cora Peterson1, Elizabeth Ailes2, Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso3, Matthew E Oster4, Richard S Olney3, Cynthia H Cassell3, David E Fixler5, Suzan L Carmichael6, Gary M Shaw6, Suzanne M Gilboa3.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) was added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel for Newborns in the United States in 2011. Many states have recently adopted or are considering requirements for universal CCHD screening through pulse oximetry in birth hospitals. Limited previous research is directly applicable to the question of how many US infants with CCHD might be identified through screening.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion of US infants with late detection of CCHD (>3 days after birth) based on existing clinical practice and to investigate factors associated with late detection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Descriptive and multivariable analysis. Data were obtained from a multisite population-based study of birth defects in the United States, the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS). We included all live-born infants with estimated dates of delivery from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2007, and nonsyndromic, clinically verified CCHD conditions potentially detectable through screening via pulse oximetry. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome measure was the proportion of infants with late detection of CCHD through echocardiography or at autopsy under the assumption that universal screening at birth hospitals might reduce the number of such late diagnoses. Secondary outcome measures included prevalence ratios for associations between selected demographic and clinical factors and late detection of CCHD.
RESULTS: Of 3746 live-born infants with nonsyndromic CCHD, late detection occurred in 1106 (29.5% [95% CI, 28.1%-31.0%]), including 6 (0.2%) (0.1%-0.4%) first receiving a diagnosis at autopsy more than 3 days after birth. Late detection varied by CCHD type from 9 of 120 infants (7.5% [95% CI, 3.5%-13.8%]) with pulmonary atresia to 497 of 801 (62.0% [58.7%-65.4%]) with coarctation of the aorta. In multivariable analysis, late detection varied significantly by CCHD type and study site, and infants with extracardiac defects were significantly less likely to have late detection of CCHD (adjusted prevalence ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.49-0.69]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We estimate that 29.5% of live-born infants with nonsyndromic CCHD in the NBDPS received a diagnosis more than 3 days after birth and therefore might have benefited from routine CCHD screening at birth hospitals. The number of infants in whom CCHD was detected through screening likely varies by several factors, including CCHD type. Additional population-based studies of screening in practice are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24493342      PMCID: PMC4470377          DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Pediatr        ISSN: 2168-6203            Impact factor:   16.193


  50 in total

1.  Combining pulse oximetry and clinical examination in screening for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  A F Bakr; H S Habib
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Pulse oximetry screening as a complementary strategy to detect critical congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Alf Meberg; Andreas Andreassen; Leif Brunvand; Trond Markestad; Dag Moster; Lutz Nietsch; Inger Elisabeth Silberg; Jan Einar Skålevik
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 2.299

3.  First day of life pulse oximetry screening to detect congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Alf Meberg; Sabine Brügmann-Pieper; Reidar Due; Leif Eskedal; Ingebjørg Fagerli; Teresa Farstad; Dag Helge Frøisland; Catharina Hovland Sannes; Ole Jakob Johansen; Jasmina Keljalic; Trond Markestad; Egil Andre Nygaard; Alet Røsvik; Inger Elisabeth Silberg
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 4.  A practical guide for multivariate analysis of dichotomous outcomes.

Authors:  James Lee; Chuen Seng Tan; Kee Seng Chia
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singap       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.473

5.  Results from the New Jersey statewide critical congenital heart defects screening program.

Authors:  Lorraine F Garg; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Mary M Knapp; Terry M Anderson; Robert I Koppel; Daniel Hirsch; Leslie M Beres; Joseph Sweatlock; Richard S Olney; Jill Glidewell; Cynthia F Hinton; Alex R Kemper
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Failure to diagnose congenital heart disease in infancy.

Authors:  K S Kuehl; C A Loffredo; C Ferencz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Indications and limitations for a neonatal pulse oximetry screening of critical congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Enrico Rosati; Giovanna Chitano; Lucia Dipaola; Claudio De Felice; Giuseppe Latini
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.901

8.  Epidemiologic features of the presentation of critical congenital heart disease: implications for screening.

Authors:  Amy H Schultz; A Russell Localio; Bernard J Clark; Chitra Ravishankar; Nancy Videon; Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  The reliability of a single pulse oximetry reading as a screening test for congenital heart disease in otherwise asymptomatic newborn infants.

Authors:  J D Reich; B Connolly; G Bradley; S Littman; W Koeppel; P Lewycky; M Liske
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.655

10.  Feasibility of implementing pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart disease in a community hospital.

Authors:  E A Bradshaw; S Cuzzi; S C Kiernan; N Nagel; J A Becker; G R Martin
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.521

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Detection of critical congenital heart defects: Review of contributions from prenatal and newborn screening.

Authors:  Richard S Olney; Elizabeth C Ailes; Marci K Sontag
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Critical Congenital Heart Disease Newborn Screening Implementation: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Monica R McClain; John S Hokanson; Regina Grazel; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Lorraine F Garg; Michelle R Morris; Kathleen Moline; Keri Urquhart; Amy Nance; Harper Randall; Marci K Sontag
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-06

Review 4.  Addressing health disparities in rural communities using telehealth.

Authors:  James P Marcin; Ulfat Shaikh; Robin H Steinhorn
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.756

5.  Estimated number of infants detected and missed by critical congenital heart defect screening.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Ailes; Suzanne M Gilboa; Margaret A Honein; Matthew E Oster
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Evaluation of a Screening Program to Detect Critical Congenital Heart Defects in Newborns.

Authors:  Rachel Klausner; Eugene D Shapiro; Robert W Elder; Eve Colson; Jaspreet Loyal
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2017-03-01

7.  Improving Longitudinal Outcomes, Efficiency, and Equity in the Care of Patients With Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Brett R Anderson; Kacie Dragan; Sarah Crook; Joyce L Woo; Stephen Cook; Edward L Hannan; Jane W Newburger; Marshall Jacobs; Emile A Bacha; Robert Vincent; Khanh Nguyen; Kathleen Walsh-Spoonhower; Ralph Mosca; Neil Devejian; Steven A Kamenir; George M Alfieris; Michael F Swartz; David Meyer; Erin A Paul; John Billings
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Survival and Associated Risk Factors for Mortality Among Infants with Critical Congenital Heart Disease in a Developing Country.

Authors:  Mohd Nizam Mat Bah; Mohd Hanafi Sapian; Mohammad Tamim Jamil; Amelia Alias; Norazah Zahari
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Pulse oximetry screening in newborns to enhance detection of critical congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Michael Narvey; Kenny K Wong; Anne Fournier
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Pulse oximetry screening to detect critical congenital heart diseases in asymptomatic neonates.

Authors:  Shridhar Gopalakrishnan; Saurabh Karmani; Abhishek Pandey; Navreet Singh; J Ratheesh Kumar; Ramar Praveen; Kirandeep Sodhi
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2020-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.