Literature DB >> 23117330

Improved prenatal detection of congenital heart disease in an integrated health care system.

Denis J Levy1, Dolores H Pretorius, Abraham Rothman, Marcos Gonzales, Cherie Rao, Mark E Nunes, Julian Bendelstein, Karen Mehalek, Amy Thomas, Candace Nehlsen, Jessica Ehr, Raoul J Burchette, Mark S Sklansky.   

Abstract

The reported prenatal detection rates (PDRs) for significant congenital heart disease (sCHD) have been suboptimal, even in the current era. Changes in prenatal ultrasound policy and training may lead to improved prenatal detection of sCHD. This study analyzed the results of a policy to assess fetal cardiac outflow tracts shown by screening prenatal ultrasound using the electronic medical record (EMR). During a 6-year period, fetuses and patients younger than 1 year with sCHD were identified. The EMR was used to gather detection and outcome data. As an internal control within the same health care system, the PDR of only the surgical cases was compared with that of a similar group in which documentation of the fetal cardiac outflow tracts was not standard policy. Among 25,666 births, sCHD was identified in 93 fetuses or patients, yielding an incidence of 3.6 per 1,000 births. The PDR was 74.1%. Detection after birth but before discharge was 20.4%, and detection after discharge was 5.4%. A significant improvement in the PDR of sCHD was found when a concerted effort was made to obtain fetal cardiac outflow tract views during pregnancy screening (59.3 vs. 28%). Within an integrated health care system and with the use of an EMR, a PDR of 74% can be obtained, and 94% of sCHD can be detected before discharge. A concerted program that includes documentation of fetal cardiac outflow tracts in the pregnancy screening can result in improved PDR of sCHD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23117330     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-012-0526-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  20 in total

1.  Barriers to prenatal detection of congenital heart disease: a population-based study.

Authors:  N M Pinto; H T Keenan; L L Minich; M D Puchalski; M Heywood; L D Botto
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease in the northern region of England: benefits of a training programme for obstetric ultrasonographers.

Authors:  S Hunter; A Heads; J Wyllie; S Robson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Prenatal screening for congenital heart disease with four-chamber and outflow-tract views: a multicenter study.

Authors:  G Oggè; P Gaglioti; S Maccanti; F Faggiano; T Todros
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Prenatal ultrasound screening of congenital heart disease in an unselected national population: a 21-year experience.

Authors:  Jan Marek; Viktor Tomek; Jan Skovránek; Viera Povysilová; Milan Samánek
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries.

Authors:  E Garne; C Stoll; M Clementi
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Delayed diagnosis of congenital heart disease worsens preoperative condition and outcome of surgery in neonates.

Authors:  K L Brown; D A Ridout; A Hoskote; L Verhulst; M Ricci; C Bull
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Screening for congenital heart disease prenatally. Results of a 2 1/2-year study in the South East Thames Region.

Authors:  G K Sharland; L D Allan
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1992-03

8.  Improving the effectiveness of routine prenatal screening for major congenital heart defects.

Authors:  J S Carvalho; E Mavrides; E A Shinebourne; S Campbell; B Thilaganathan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Mark K Friedberg; Norman H Silverman; Anita J Moon-Grady; Elizabeth Tong; Jennifer Nourse; Beatrice Sorenson; Jaimie Lee; Lisa K Hornberger
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Population-based study of antenatal detection of congenital heart disease by ultrasound examination.

Authors:  C Chew; J L Halliday; M M Riley; D J Penny
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.299

View more
  20 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of the fetal heart using Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE).

Authors:  M Garcia; L Yeo; R Romero; D Haggerty; I Giardina; S S Hassan; T Chaiworapongsa; E Hernandez-Andrade
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease: time for a breakthrough.

Authors:  Karim A Diab; Sawsan Awad
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 3.  Prenatal Counseling of Fetal Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Caroline K Lee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-01

Review 4.  Detection of critical congenital heart defects: Review of contributions from prenatal and newborn screening.

Authors:  Richard S Olney; Elizabeth C Ailes; Marci K Sontag
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.300

5.  Low rate of prenatal diagnosis among neonates with critical aortic stenosis: insight into the natural history in utero.

Authors:  L R Freud; A Moon-Grady; M C Escobar-Diaz; N L Gotteiner; L T Young; D B McElhinney; W Tworetzky
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Risk of congenital heart disease in relatives of probands with conotruncal cardiac defects: an evaluation of 1,620 families.

Authors:  Shabnam Peyvandi; Eitan Ingall; Stacy Woyciechowski; Jennifer Garbarini; Laura E Mitchell; Elizabeth Goldmuntz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Prenatal detection of critical cardiac outflow tract anomalies remains suboptimal despite revised obstetrical imaging guidelines.

Authors:  Heather Y Sun; James A Proudfoot; Rachel T McCandless
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.007

8.  Transport of infants with congenital heart disease: benefits of antenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Neelam Gupta; Louise Leven; Michael Stewart; Michael Cheung; Neil Patel
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  Prenatal diagnosis of transposition of the great arteries over a 20-year period: improved but imperfect.

Authors:  M C Escobar-Diaz; L R Freud; A Bueno; D W Brown; K G Friedman; D Schidlow; S Emani; P J Del Nido; W Tworetzky
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  Variation in Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease in Infants.

Authors:  Michael D Quartermain; Sara K Pasquali; Kevin D Hill; David J Goldberg; James C Huhta; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Marshall L Jacobs; Sunghee Kim; Ross M Ungerleider
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.