Literature DB >> 23798030

Sensory and cognitive influences on the training-related improvement of reading speed in peripheral vision.

Yingchen He1, Gordon E Legge, Deyue Yu.   

Abstract

Reading speed in normal peripheral vision is slow but can be increased through training on a letter-recognition task. The aim of the present study is to investigate the sensory and cognitive factors responsible for this improvement. The visual span is hypothesized to be a sensory bottleneck limiting reading speed. Three sensory factors-letter acuity, crowding, and mislocations (errors in the spatial order of letters)-may limit the size of the visual span. Reading speed is also influenced by cognitive factors including the utilization of information from sentence context. We conducted a perceptual training experiment to investigate the roles of these factors. Training consisted of four daily sessions of trigram letter-recognition trials at 10° in the lower visual field. Subjects' visual-span profiles and reading speeds were measured in pre- and posttests. Effects of the three sensory factors were isolated through a decomposition analysis of the visual span profiles. The impact of sentence context was indexed by context gain, the ratio of reading speeds for ordered and unordered text. Following training, visual spans increased in size by 5.4 bits of information transmitted, and reading speeds increased by 45%. Training induced a substantial reduction in the magnitude of crowding (4.8 bits) and a smaller reduction for mislocations (0.7 bits), but no change in letter acuity or context gain. These results indicate that the basis of the training-related improvement in reading speed is a large reduction in the interfering effect of crowding and a small reduction of mislocation errors.

Keywords:  context gain; crowding; peripheral vision; reading; visual span

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23798030      PMCID: PMC3692378          DOI: 10.1167/13.7.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  29 in total

1.  Are the benefits of sentence context different in central and peripheral vision?

Authors:  E M Fine; C A Hazel; K L Petre; G S Rubin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Psychophysics of reading. XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; J S Mansfield; S T Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Comparing perceptual learning tasks: a review.

Authors:  Ione Fine; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Letter-recognition and reading speed in peripheral vision benefit from perceptual learning.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Gordon E Legge; Sing-hang Cheung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Reading speed benefits from increased vertical word spacing in normal peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Reading without saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  G S Rubin; K Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness.

Authors:  S He; P Cavanagh; J Intriligator
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Training improves reading speed in peripheral vision: is it due to attention?

Authors:  Hye-Won Lee; Miyoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge; Joshua J Gefroh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Small effect of interline spacing on maximal reading speed in low-vision patients with central field loss irrespective of scotoma size.

Authors:  Aurélie Calabrèse; Jean-Baptiste Bernard; Louis Hoffart; Géraldine Faure; Fatiha Barouch; John Conrath; Eric Castet
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Learning to see again: biological constraints on cortical plasticity and the implications for sight restoration technologies.

Authors:  Michael Beyeler; Ariel Rokem; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Learning to read vertical text in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Ahalya Subramanian; Gordon E Legge; Gunther Harrison Wagoner; Deyue Yu
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Training peripheral vision to read: Boosting the speed of letter processing.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Gordon E Legge; Gunther Wagoner; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Comparing the visual spans for faces and letters.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Jennifer M Scholz; Rachel Gage; Christopher S Kallie; Tingting Liu; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Slow Reading in Glaucoma: Is it due to the Shrinking Visual Span in Central Vision?

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Rong Liu; Bhavika N Patel; Christopher Girkin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Effect of pattern complexity on the visual span for Chinese and alphabet characters.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Xuanzi He; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Sensory factors limiting horizontal and vertical visual span for letter recognition.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Gordon E Legge; Gunther Wagoner; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Common constraints limit Korean and English character recognition in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yingchen He; MiYoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method.

Authors:  Timothy G Shepard; Fang Hou; Peter J Bex; Luis A Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Korean reading speed: Effects of print size and retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Sori Baek; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.