Literature DB >> 14751554

Letter-recognition and reading speed in peripheral vision benefit from perceptual learning.

Susana T L Chung1, Gordon E Legge, Sing-hang Cheung.   

Abstract

Visual-span profiles are plots of letter-recognition accuracy as a function of letter position left or right of the midline. Previously, we have shown that contraction of these profiles in peripheral vision can account for slow reading speed in peripheral vision. In this study, we asked two questions: (1) can we modify visual-span profiles through training on letter-recognition, and if so, (2) are these changes accompanied by changes in reading speed? Eighteen normally sighted observers were randomly assigned to one of three groups: training at 10 degrees in the upper visual field, training at 10 degrees in the lower visual field and a no-training control group. We compared observers' characteristics of reading (maximum reading speed and critical print size) and visual-span profiles (peak amplitude and bits of information transmitted) before and after training, and at trained and untrained retinal locations (10 degrees upper and lower visual fields). Reading speeds were measured for six print sizes at each retinal location, using the rapid serial visual presentation paradigm. Visual-span profiles were measured using a trigram letter-recognition task, for a letter size equivalent to 1.4x the critical print size for reading. Training consisted of the repeated measurement of 20 visual-span profiles (over four consecutive days) in either the upper or lower visual field. We also tracked the changes in performance in a sub-group of observers for up to three months following training. We found that the visual-span profiles can be expanded (bits of information transmitted increased by 6 bits) through training with a letter-recognition task, and that there is an accompanying increase (41%) in the maximum reading speed. These improvements transferred, to a large extent, from the trained to an untrained retinal location, and were retained, to a large extent, for at least three months following training. Our results are consistent with the view that the visual span is a bottleneck on reading speed, but a bottleneck that can be increased with practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14751554      PMCID: PMC2729075          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  29 in total

1.  Visual field asymmetries in attention and learning.

Authors:  A Ellison; V Walsh
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2000

2.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity.

Authors:  A Karni; D Sagi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity.

Authors:  T Poggio; M Fahle; S Edelman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination.

Authors:  K Ball; R Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view.

Authors:  K K Ball; B L Beard; D L Roenker; R L Miller; D S Griggs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Long-term learning in vernier acuity: effects of stimulus orientation, range and of feedback.

Authors:  M Fahle; S Edelman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Learning in grating waveform discrimination: specificity for orientation and spatial frequency.

Authors:  A Fiorentini; N Berardi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Low vision care: correlation of patient age, visual goals, and aids prescribed.

Authors:  S R Kleen; R J Levoy
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1981-03

9.  A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination.

Authors:  K Ball; R Sekuler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-11-12       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  A quantitative measure for short-term cortical plasticity in human vision.

Authors:  M K Kapadia; C D Gilbert; G Westheimer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  57 in total

Review 1.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Locating the cortical bottleneck for slow reading in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Yi Jiang; Gordon E Legge; Sheng He
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Learning letter identification in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Dennis M Levi; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Learning to identify contrast-defined letters in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Dennis M Levi; Roger W Li
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Identification of contrast-defined letters benefits from perceptual learning in adults with amblyopia.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Roger W Li; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Mechanisms of perceptual learning of depth discrimination in random dot stereograms.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Saumil S Patel; Susana T L Chung; Ronald S Harwerth
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The dependence of visual scanning performance on saccade, fixation, and perceptual metrics.

Authors:  Matthew H Phillips; Jay A Edelman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Sing-Hang Cheung; Deyue Yu; Susana T L Chung; Hye-Won Lee; Daniel P Owens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Enhancing visual performance for people with central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Dependence of reading speed on letter spacing in central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.