Literature DB >> 1604858

Reading without saccadic eye movements.

G S Rubin1, K Turano.   

Abstract

To assess the limitation on reading speed imposed by saccadic eye movements, we measured reading speed in 13 normally-sighted observers using two modes of text presentations: PAGE text which presents an entire passage conventionally in static, paragraph format, and rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) which presents text sequentially, one word at a time at the same location in the visual field. In Expt 1, subjects read PAGE and RSVP text orally across a wide range of letter sizes (2X to 32X single-letter acuity) and reading speed was computed from the number of correct words read per minute. Reading speeds were consistently faster for RSVP compared to PAGE text at all letter sizes tested. The average speeds for text of an intermediate letter size (8X acuity) were 1171 words/min for RSVP and 303 words/min for PAGE text. In Expt 2 subjects read PAGE and RSVP text silently and a multiple-choice comprehension test was administered after each passage. All subjects continued to read RSVP text faster, and 6 subjects read at the maximum testable rate (1652 words/min) with at least 75% correct on the comprehension tests. Experiment 3 assessed the minimum word exposure time required for decoding text using RSVP to minimize potential delays due to saccadic eye movement control. Successive words were presented for a fixed duration (word duration) with a blank interval (ISI) between words. The minimum word duration required for accurate oral reading averaged 69.4 msec and was not reduced by increasing ISI. We interpret these results as an indication that the programming and execution of saccadic eye movements impose an upper limit on conventional reading speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1604858     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90032-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  48 in total

1.  Invariance between subjects of brain wave representations of language.

Authors:  P Suppes; B Han; J Epelboim; Z L Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Serifs and font legibility.

Authors:  Aries Arditi; Jianna Cho
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Where people look when watching movies: do all viewers look at the same place?

Authors:  Robert B Goldstein; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Letter case and text legibility in normal and low vision.

Authors:  Aries Arditi; Jianna Cho
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Trade-off between object selectivity and tolerance in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Davide Zoccolan; Minjoon Kouh; Tomaso Poggio; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Sing-Hang Cheung; Deyue Yu; Susana T L Chung; Hye-Won Lee; Daniel P Owens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Retinotopy of the face aftereffect.

Authors:  Seyed-Reza Afraz; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method.

Authors:  Timothy G Shepard; Fang Hou; Peter J Bex; Luis A Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Enhancing visual performance for people with central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Dependence of reading speed on letter spacing in central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.