Literature DB >> 29327041

Common constraints limit Korean and English character recognition in peripheral vision.

Yingchen He1, MiYoung Kwon2, Gordon E Legge1.   

Abstract

The visual span refers to the number of adjacent characters that can be recognized in a single glance. It is viewed as a sensory bottleneck in reading for both normal and clinical populations. In peripheral vision, the visual span for English characters can be enlarged after training with a letter-recognition task. Here, we examined the transfer of training from Korean to English characters for a group of bilingual Korean native speakers. In the pre- and posttests, we measured visual spans for Korean characters and English letters. Training (1.5 hours × 4 days) consisted of repetitive visual-span measurements for Korean trigrams (strings of three characters). Our training enlarged the visual spans for Korean single characters and trigrams, and the benefit transferred to untrained English symbols. The improvement was largely due to a reduction of within-character and between-character crowding in Korean recognition, as well as between-letter crowding in English recognition. We also found a negative correlation between the size of the visual span and the average pattern complexity of the symbol set. Together, our results showed that the visual span is limited by common sensory (crowding) and physical (pattern complexity) factors regardless of the language script, providing evidence that the visual span reflects a universal bottleneck for text recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29327041      PMCID: PMC5764199          DOI: 10.1167/18.1.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  32 in total

1.  Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  E Leslie Cameron; Joanna C Tai; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Covert attention enhances letter identification without affecting channel tuning.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Denis G Pelli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Sing-Hang Cheung; Deyue Yu; Susana T L Chung; Hye-Won Lee; Daniel P Owens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Comparing the visual spans for faces and letters.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Jennifer M Scholz; Rachel Gage; Christopher S Kallie; Tingting Liu; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet.

Authors:  M J Gervais; L O Harvey; J O Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Training improves reading speed in peripheral vision: is it due to attention?

Authors:  Hye-Won Lee; Miyoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge; Joshua J Gefroh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Transient attention enhances perceptual performance and FMRI response in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Development of a training protocol to improve reading performance in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Gordon E Legge; Heejung Park; Emily Gage; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Learning to detect and combine the features of an object.

Authors:  Jordan W Suchow; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  Fonts Designed for Macular Degeneration: Impact on Reading.

Authors:  Ying-Zi Xiong; Ethan A Lorsung; John Stephen Mansfield; Charles Bigelow; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Korean reading speed: Effects of print size and retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Sori Baek; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.