Literature DB >> 10566861

Are the benefits of sentence context different in central and peripheral vision?

E M Fine1, C A Hazel, K L Petre, G S Rubin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sentence context increases reading speed relative to reading unrelated words. Previous studies of normal peripheral retina and in patients with central field loss (CFL) have come to different conclusions regarding the benefits of sentence context for reading in peripheral retina. Studies of normal peripheral vision presented the text to inferior visual field; it is presumed that most of the patients fixated using retina lateral to their scotoma. The goal of the current study was to determine whether the location of the text on the retina interacts with the usefulness of sentence context.
METHODS: Normally sighted subjects read sentences and random lists of words presented at the fovea and at 50 to the left of and 50 inferior to fixation in visual field space. Texts were presented using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP).
RESULTS: The ratio of reading rates for sentences to random words (context gain) was the same in the inferior field (2.7 +/- 0.20) and at the fovea (2.6 +/- 0.26); context gain was greater in the left field (7.2 +/- 1.22).
CONCLUSIONS: Sentence context increases reading speed regardless of the position of the text on the retina. Reading rates in peripheral retina are not decreased because of an inability to use sentence context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10566861     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199911000-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  7 in total

1.  The relationship between word length and threshold character size in patients with central scotoma and eccentric fixation.

Authors:  Anouk Déruaz; Mira Goldschmidt; Christophe Mermoud; Andrew R Whatham; Avinoam B Safran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Predictions of postoperative visual outcome in subjects with cataract: a preoperative and postoperative study.

Authors:  William A Douthwaite; Marta Vianya-Estopà; David B Elliott
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-23       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Sensory and cognitive influences on the training-related improvement of reading speed in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Gordon E Legge; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Parafoveal vision impairments and their influence on reading performance and self-evaluated reading abilities.

Authors:  Carolin Gall; Caroline Wagenbreth; Susann Sgorzaly; Gabriele H Franke; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Perceptual and Cognitive Factors Imposing "Speed Limits" on Reading Rate: A Study with the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.

Authors:  Silvia Primativo; Donatella Spinelli; Pierluigi Zoccolotti; Maria De Luca; Marialuisa Martelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reading with letter transpositions in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Ying-Zi Xiong; Chenyue Qiao; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Does the mean adequately represent reading performance? Evidence from a cross-linguistic study.

Authors:  Chiara V Marinelli; Joanna K Horne; Sarah P McGeown; Pierluigi Zoccolotti; Marialuisa Martelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.