Literature DB >> 12678592

Comparing perceptual learning tasks: a review.

Ione Fine1, Robert A Jacobs.   

Abstract

We compared perceptual learning in 16 psychophysical studies, ranging from low-level spatial frequency and orientation discrimination tasks to high-level object and face-recognition tasks. All studies examined learning over at least four sessions and were carried out foveally or using free fixation. Comparison of learning effects across this wide range of tasks demonstrates that the amount of learning varies widely between different tasks. A variety of factors seems to affect learning, including the number of perceptual dimensions relevant to the task, external noise, familiarity, and task complexity.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12678592     DOI: 10.1167/2.2.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  94 in total

Review 1.  Possibilities and limitations of current stereo-endoscopy.

Authors:  U D A Mueller-Richter; A Limberger; P Weber; K W Ruprecht; W Spitzer; M Schilling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Learning-dependent plasticity with and without training in the human brain.

Authors:  Jiaxiang Zhang; Zoe Kourtzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Accounting for speed-accuracy tradeoff in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Charles C Liu; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Preparatory activations across a distributed cortical network determine production of express saccades in humans.

Authors:  Jordan P Hamm; Kara A Dyckman; Lauren E Ethridge; Jennifer E McDowell; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Prolonged maturation of auditory perception and learning in gerbils.

Authors:  Emma C Sarro; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.964

6.  Learning letter identification in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Dennis M Levi; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The time course and specificity of perceptual deterioration.

Authors:  Sara C Mednick; A Cyrus Arman; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Learning to identify contrast-defined letters in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Dennis M Levi; Roger W Li
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Demonstration of cue recruitment: change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Qi Haijiang; Jeffrey A Saunders; Rebecca W Stone; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Joseph F Rizzo; Ian L Bailey; August Colenbrander; Gislin Dagnelie; Duane R Geruschat; Philip C Hessburg; Chris D McCarthy; Matthew A Petoe; Gary S Rubin; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.