Literature DB >> 24993020

Effect of pattern complexity on the visual span for Chinese and alphabet characters.

Hui Wang1, Xuanzi He2, Gordon E Legge3.   

Abstract

The visual span for reading is the number of letters that can be recognized without moving the eyes and is hypothesized to impose a sensory limitation on reading speed. Factors affecting the size of the visual span have been studied using alphabet letters. There may be common constraints applying to recognition of other scripts. The aim of this study was to extend the concept of the visual span to Chinese characters and to examine the effect of the greater complexity of these characters. We measured visual spans for Chinese characters and alphabet letters in the central vision of bilingual subjects. Perimetric complexity was used as a metric to quantify the pattern complexity of binary character images. The visual span tests were conducted with four sets of stimuli differing in complexity--lowercase alphabet letters and three groups of Chinese characters. We found that the size of visual spans decreased with increasing complexity, ranging from 10.5 characters for alphabet letters to 4.5 characters for the most complex Chinese characters studied. A decomposition analysis revealed that crowding was the dominant factor limiting the size of the visual span, and the amount of crowding increased with complexity. Errors in the spatial arrangement of characters (mislocations) had a secondary effect. We conclude that pattern complexity has a major effect on the size of the visual span, mediated in large part by crowding. Measuring the visual span for Chinese characters is likely to have high relevance to understanding visual constraints on Chinese reading performance.
© 2014 ARVO.

Keywords:  Chinese character recognition; Chinese reading; complexity; crowding; peripheral vision; reading; visual span

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24993020      PMCID: PMC4083876          DOI: 10.1167/14.8.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  28 in total

1.  Psychophysics of reading. XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; J S Mansfield; S T Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view.

Authors:  H Strasburger; L O Harvey; I Rentschler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-06

3.  Sensory and cognitive influences on the training-related improvement of reading speed in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Gordon E Legge; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; W Liu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Psychophysics of reading--XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; S J Ahn; T S Klitz; A Luebker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words.

Authors:  H Bouma
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.

Authors:  H Bouma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The effect of visibility on eye-movement parameters in reading.

Authors:  J K O'Regan; A Lévy-Schoen; A M Jacobs
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-11

9.  Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-06

10.  Reading without a fovea.

Authors:  K Rayner; J H Bertera
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  14 in total

1.  Perceptual expertise with Chinese characters predicts Chinese reading performance among Hong Kong Chinese children with developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Yetta Kwailing Wong; Christine Kong-Yan Tong; Ming Lui; Alan C-N Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Comparing the visual spans for faces and letters.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Jennifer M Scholz; Rachel Gage; Christopher S Kallie; Tingting Liu; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Comparing the minimum spatial-frequency content for recognizing Chinese and alphabet characters.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Common constraints limit Korean and English character recognition in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yingchen He; MiYoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Fonts Designed for Macular Degeneration: Impact on Reading.

Authors:  Ying-Zi Xiong; Ethan A Lorsung; John Stephen Mansfield; Charles Bigelow; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Korean reading speed: Effects of print size and retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Sori Baek; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Age-related changes in crowding and reading speed.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Bhavika N Patel; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The effect of letter string length and report condition on letter recognition accuracy.

Authors:  Avesh Raghunandan; Berta Karmazinaite; Andrea S Rossow
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-02-21

9.  Learning to recognize letters in the periphery: Effects of repeated exposure, letter frequency, and letter complexity.

Authors:  Jesse S Husk; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  A New Font, Specifically Designed for Peripheral Vision, Improves Peripheral Letter and Word Recognition, but Not Eye-Mediated Reading Performance.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Bernard; Carlos Aguilar; Eric Castet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.