Literature DB >> 25062130

Learning to read vertical text in peripheral vision.

Ahalya Subramanian1, Gordon E Legge, Gunther Harrison Wagoner, Deyue Yu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: English-language text is almost always written horizontally. Text can be formatted to run vertically, but this is seldom used. Several studies have found that horizontal text can be read faster than vertical text in the central visual field. No studies have investigated the peripheral visual field. Studies have also concluded that training can improve reading speed in the peripheral visual field for horizontal text. We aimed to establish whether the horizontal vertical differences are maintained and if training can improve vertical reading in the peripheral visual field.
METHODS: Eight normally sighted young adults participated in the first study. Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) reading speed was measured for horizontal and vertical text in the central visual field and at 10 degrees eccentricity in the upper or lower (horizontal text) and right or left (vertical text) visual fields. Twenty-one normally sighted young adults split equally between two training groups and one control group participated in the second study. Training consisted of RSVP reading using either vertical text in the left visual field or horizontal text in the inferior visual field. Subjects trained daily over 4 days. Pre- and post- horizontal and vertical RSVP reading speeds were carried out for all groups. For the training groups, these measurements were repeated 1 week and 1 month posttraining.
RESULTS: Before training, RSVP reading speeds were faster for horizontal text in the central and peripheral visual fields when compared with vertical text. Training vertical reading improved vertical reading speeds by an average factor of 2.8. There was partial transfer of training to the opposite (right) hemifield. The training effects were retained for up to a month.
CONCLUSIONS: Rapid serial visual presentation training can improve RSVP vertical text reading in peripheral vision. These findings may have implications for patients with macular degeneration or hemianopic field loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25062130      PMCID: PMC4142119          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  26 in total

1.  Is word recognition different in central and peripheral vision?

Authors:  Hye-Won Lee; Gordon E Legge; Alberto Ortiz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not?

Authors:  A Koriat; J Norman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Sensory and cognitive influences on the training-related improvement of reading speed in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Gordon E Legge; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Learning pop-out detection: specificities to stimulus characteristics.

Authors:  M Ahissar; S Hochstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Reading rotated words.

Authors:  A Koriat; J Norman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Control of eye movement with peripheral vision: implications for training of eccentric viewing.

Authors:  E Peli
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1986-02

8.  What is rotated in mental rotation?

Authors:  A Koriat; J Norman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States.

Authors:  Nathan Congdon; Benita O'Colmain; Caroline C W Klaver; Ronald Klein; Beatriz Muñoz; David S Friedman; John Kempen; Hugh R Taylor; Paul Mitchell
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

10.  The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research.

Authors:  D J Buysse; C F Reynolds; T H Monk; S R Berman; D J Kupfer
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.222

View more
  5 in total

1.  How Does Vertical Reading Affect Reading Speed?

Authors:  Kayleigh Porter; Gemma Arblaster
Journal:  Br Ir Orthopt J       Date:  2020-08-05

2.  Does Vertical Reading Help People with Macular Degeneration: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Aurélie Calabrèse; Tingting Liu; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Training peripheral vision to read: Using stimulus exposure and identity priming.

Authors:  Deyue Yu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Baseline MNREAD Measures for Normally Sighted Subjects From Childhood to Old Age.

Authors:  Aurélie Calabrèse; Allen M Y Cheong; Sing-Hang Cheung; Yingchen He; MiYoung Kwon; J Stephen Mansfield; Ahalya Subramanian; Deyue Yu; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Training of vertical versus horizontal reading in patients with hemianopia - a randomized and controlled study.

Authors:  S Kuester-Gruber; P Kabisch; A Cordey; H-O Karnath; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.117

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.