Literature DB >> 23768045

Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers.

Nathalie N Bélanger1, Rachel I Mayberry, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

Many deaf individuals do not develop the high-level reading skills that will allow them to fully take part into society. To attempt to explain this widespread difficulty in the deaf population, much research has honed in on the use of phonological codes during reading. The hypothesis that the use of phonological codes is associated with good reading skills in deaf readers, though not well supported, still lingers in the literature. We investigated skilled and less-skilled adult deaf readers' processing of orthographic and phonological codes in parafoveal vision during reading by monitoring their eye movements and using the boundary paradigm. Orthographic preview benefits were found in early measures of reading for skilled hearing, skilled deaf, and less-skilled deaf readers, but only skilled hearing readers processed phonological codes in parafoveal vision. Crucially, skilled and less-skilled deaf readers showed a very similar pattern of preview benefits during reading. These results support the notion that reading difficulties in deaf adults are not linked to their failure to activate phonological codes during reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23768045      PMCID: PMC3808502          DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.780085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  20 in total

1.  Reading optimally builds on spoken language: implications for deaf readers.

Authors:  C A Perfetti; R Sandak
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Vowel processing during silent reading: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Jane Ashby; Rebecca Treiman; Brett Kessler; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Masked phonological priming effects in English: are they real? Do they matter?

Authors:  Kathleen Rastle; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision.

Authors:  M Perea; A Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographic and phonological representations in young readers.

Authors:  J R Booth; C A Perfetti; B MacWhinney
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1999-01

7.  Phonological codes and eye movements in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A Pollatsek; K S Binder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Phonological coding in word reading: evidence from hearing and deaf readers.

Authors:  V L Hanson; C A Fowler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

9.  Eye guidance in reading: fixation locations within words.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  How psychological science informs the teaching of reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; B R Foorman; C A Perfetti; D Pesetsky; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Phonological coding during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Parafoveal activation of sign translation previews among deaf readers during the reading of Chinese sentences.

Authors:  Jinger Pan; Hua Shu; Yuling Wang; Ming Yan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

3.  Orthographic and phonological selectivity across the reading system in deaf skilled readers.

Authors:  Laurie S Glezer; Jill Weisberg; Cindy O'Grady Farnady; Stephen McCullough; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

5.  ERP effects of masked orthographic neighbour priming in deaf readers.

Authors:  Gabriela Meade; Jonathan Grainger; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Chinese deaf readers have early access to parafoveal semantics.

Authors:  Ming Yan; Jinger Pan; Nathalie N Bélanger; Hua Shu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The neural circuits recruited for the production of signs and fingerspelled words.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Sonya Mehta; Stephen McCullough; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  What Eye Movements Reveal about Deaf Readers.

Authors:  Nathalie N Bélanger; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-06

9.  The N170 ERP component differs in laterality, distribution, and association with continuous reading measures for deaf and hearing readers.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Katherine J Midgley; Casey B Kohen; Zed Sevcikova Sehyr; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Frequency and Predictability Effects in Eye Fixations for Skilled and Less-Skilled Deaf Readers.

Authors:  Nathalie N Bélanger; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.