Literature DB >> 25150679

Phonological coding during reading.

Mallorie Leinenger1.   

Abstract

The exact role that phonological coding (the recoding of written, orthographic information into a sound based code) plays during silent reading has been extensively studied for more than a century. Despite the large body of research surrounding the topic, varying theories as to the time course and function of this recoding still exist. The present review synthesizes this body of research, addressing the topics of time course and function in tandem. The varying theories surrounding the function of phonological coding (e.g., that phonological codes aid lexical access, that phonological codes aid comprehension and bolster short-term memory, or that phonological codes are largely epiphenomenal in skilled readers) are first outlined, and the time courses that each maps onto (e.g., that phonological codes come online early [prelexical] or that phonological codes come online late [postlexical]) are discussed. Next the research relevant to each of these proposed functions is reviewed, discussing the varying methodologies that have been used to investigate phonological coding (e.g., response time methods, reading while eye-tracking or recording EEG and MEG, concurrent articulation) and highlighting the advantages and limitations of each with respect to the study of phonological coding. In response to the view that phonological coding is largely epiphenomenal in skilled readers, research on the use of phonological codes in prelingually, profoundly deaf readers is reviewed. Finally, implications for current models of word identification (activation-verification model, Van Orden, 1987; dual-route model, e.g., M. Coltheart, Rastle, Perry, Langdon, & Ziegler, 2001; parallel distributed processing model, Seidenberg & McClelland, 1989) are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25150679      PMCID: PMC4211933          DOI: 10.1037/a0037830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  109 in total

1.  The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: evidence from proofreading and eye movements.

Authors:  D Jared; B A Levy; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-09

2.  Activation of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  Y A Lee; K S Binder; J O Kim; A Pollatsek; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Verbal coding strategies used by hearing-impaired individuals.

Authors:  R D Moulton; D S Beasley
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1975-09

Review 4.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Kristi Kiyonaga; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-12

6.  Phonological codes and eye movements in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A Pollatsek; K S Binder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Coding medium and word recall by deaf and hearing subjects.

Authors:  P B Odom; R L Blanton; C K McIntyre
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1970-03

8.  Stress Matters: Effects of Anticipated Lexical Stress on Silent Reading.

Authors:  Mara Breen; Charles Clifton
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  When deaf signers read English: do written words activate their sign translations?

Authors:  Jill P Morford; Erin Wilkinson; Agnes Villwock; Pilar Piñar; Judith F Kroll
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-12-08
View more
  14 in total

1.  Early markers of lexical stress in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Simone Sulpizio; Lucia Colombo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

2.  Adults Who Stutter Show Diminished Word Fluency, Regardless of Mode.

Authors:  Erica Lescht; Michael Walsh Dickey; Melissa D Stockbridge; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Skilled adult readers activate the meanings of high-frequency words using phonology: Evidence from eye tracking.

Authors:  Debra Jared; Katrina O'Donnell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-02

4.  Survival analyses reveal how early phonological processing affects eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  How uncommon is tickertaping? Prevalence and characteristics of seeing the words you hear.

Authors:  Silje Holm; Thomas Eilertsen; Mark C Price
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.065

6.  Imitation, Sign Language Skill and the Developmental Ease of Language Understanding (D-ELU) Model.

Authors:  Emil Holmer; Mikael Heimann; Mary Rudner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-16

7.  Individual Differences in the Neural and Cognitive Mechanisms of Single Word Reading.

Authors:  Simon Fischer-Baum; Jeong Hwan Kook; Yoseph Lee; Aurora Ramos-Nuñez; Marina Vannucci
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Mark Yates; Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-10-04

9.  The unique role of lexical accessibility in predicting kindergarten emergent literacy.

Authors:  Ludo Verhoeven; Jan van Leeuwe; Rosemarie Irausquin; Eliane Segers
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2016-01-27

10.  The role of phonology in lexical access in teenagers with a history of dyslexia.

Authors:  Hazel I Blythe; Jonathan H Dickins; Colin R Kennedy; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.