Literature DB >> 23976872

Frequency and Predictability Effects in Eye Fixations for Skilled and Less-Skilled Deaf Readers.

Nathalie N Bélanger1, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

The illiteracy rate in the deaf population has been alarmingly high for several decades, despite the fact that deaf children go through the standard stages of schooling. Much research addressing this issue has focused on word-level processes, but in the recent years, little research has focused on sentence-levels processes. Previous research (Fischler, 1985) investigated word integration within context in college-level deaf and hearing readers in a lexical decision task following incomplete sentences with targets that were congruous or incongruous relative to the preceding context; it was found that deaf readers, as a group, were more dependent on contextual information than their hearing counterparts. The present experiment extended Fischler's results and investigated the relationship between frequency, predictability, and reading skill in skilled hearing, skilled deaf, and less-skilled deaf readers. Results suggest that only less-skilled deaf readers, and not all deaf readers, rely more on contextual cues to boost word processing. Additionally, early effects of frequency and predictability were found for all three groups of readers, without any evidence for an interaction between frequency and predictability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deaf readers; eye movements; frequency effects; predictability effects; reading skill

Year:  2013        PMID: 23976872      PMCID: PMC3747000          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2013.804016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  25 in total

1.  The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: evidence from proofreading and eye movements.

Authors:  D Jared; B A Levy; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-09

2.  Eye movement control in reading: word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words.

Authors:  K Rayner; K S Binder; J Ashby; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Jane Ashby; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The frequency-predictability interaction in reading: it depends where you're coming from.

Authors:  Christopher J Hand; Sébastien Miellet; Patrick J O'Donnell; Sara C Sereno
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability.

Authors:  Jane Ashby; Keith Rayner; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2005-08

7.  N-watch: a program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics.

Authors:  Colin J Davis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-02

8.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

9.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

Authors:  K Rayner; S C Sereno; G E Raney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Bilingual deaf readers' use of semantic and syntactic cues in the processing of English relative clauses.

Authors:  Pilar Piñar; Matthew T Carlson; Jill P Morford; Paola E Dussias
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2016-06-29

2.  What Eye Movements Reveal about Deaf Readers.

Authors:  Nathalie N Bélanger; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-06

3.  Reading skill modulates the effect of parafoveal distractors on foveal lexical decision in deaf students.

Authors:  Jiayu Tao; Zhao Qin; Zhu Meng; Li Zhang; Lu Liu; Guoli Yan; Valerie Benson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.