Literature DB >> 9627415

The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision.

M Perea1, A Pollatsek.   

Abstract

To test the effect of the frequency of orthographic "neighbors" on the identification of a printed word, two sets of words were constructed (equated on the number of neighbors, word frequency, and number of letters); in one set, the words had no higher frequency neighbors and in the other set, they had at least one higher frequency neighbor. Identification was slower for the latter set. In Experiment 1, this was indexed by longer response times in a lexical decision task. In Experiment 2, the target words were embedded in sentences, and slower identification was indexed by disruptions in reading: more regressions back to the words with higher frequency neighbors and longer fixations on the text immediately following these words. The latter results indicate that a higher frequency neighbor affects relatively late stages of lexical access, an interpretation consistent with both activation-verification and interactive activation models.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9627415     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  25 in total

1.  Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony.

Authors:  M Perea; E Rosa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

2.  Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Eva Rosa; Consolación Gómez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

3.  Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition.

Authors:  Laree A Huntsman; Susan D Lima
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-05

4.  Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: the turple effect.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jo Hector
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

5.  Increasing interletter spacing facilitates encoding of words.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Pablo Gomez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

6.  Comparing nouns and verbs in a lexical task.

Authors:  Françoise Cordier; Jean-Claude Croizet; François Rigalleau
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-02

7.  Eyes wide open: Pupil size as a proxy for inhibition in the masked-priming paradigm.

Authors:  Jason Geller; Mary L Still; Alison L Morris
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

8.  Blocking by word frequency and neighborhood density in visual word recognition: a task-specific response criteria account.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Manuel Carreiras; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

9.  Lexical embeddings produce interference when they are morphologically unrelated to the words in which they are contained: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Kristin M Weingartner; Barbara J Juhasz; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-10-20

Review 10.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.