Literature DB >> 23717594

The genetic variant on chromosome 10p14 is associated with risk of colorectal cancer: results from a case-control study and a meta-analysis.

Qin Qin1, Li Liu, Rong Zhong, Li Zou, Jieyun Yin, Beibei Zhu, Beibei Cao, Wei Chen, Jigui Chen, Xiaorong Li, Tingting Li, Xuzai Lu, Jiao Lou, Juntao Ke, Sheng Wei, Xiaoping Miao, Shaofa Nie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A common single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs10795668, located at 10p14, was first identified to be significantly associated with risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 2008; however, another GWAS and following replication studies yielded conflicting results.
METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of 470 cases and 475 controls in a Chinese population and then performed a meta-analysis, integrating the current study and 9 publications to evaluate the association between rs10795668 and CRC risk. Heterogeneity among studies and publication bias were assessed by the χ²-based Q statistic test and Egger's test, respectively.
RESULTS: In the case-control study, significant association between the SNP and CRC risk was observed, with per-A-allele OR of 0.71 (95%CI: 0.54-0.94, P = 0.017). The following meta-analysis further confirmed the significant association, with per-A-allele OR of 0.91 (95%CI: 0.89-0.93, P(heterogeneity) >0.05) in European population and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.78-0.96, P(heterogeneity) <0.05) in Asian population. Besides, sensitivity analyses and publication bias assessment indicated the robust stability and reliability of the results.
CONCLUSIONS: Results from our case-control study and the followed meta-analysis confirmed the significant association of rs10795668 with CRC risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23717594      PMCID: PMC3661459          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Colorectal cancer(CRC) is the third most commonly cancer in males and the second in females, with over 1.2 million new cases and 608,700 deaths in 2008 worldwide[1]. In developed countries, according to the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database, CRC is the second leading cause of cancer death in developed countries, with the lifetime risk estimated to be 5–6%[2]. In developing countries, such as China, the incidence rate of CRC have grown rapidly in the past decades, especially in urban areas[3]. Shanghai, as a developed city in China, experienced an annual increase of 4.2% in colorectal cancer incidence, which was even higher than the global level (2%)[4]. CRC is provoked by interactions between genetic and environmental factors. Among all causes for CRC, inherited genetic factors account for approximately 35% of the disease etiology [5]. However, high-penetrance mutations, such as those in APC, SMAD4 and MMR genes, are responsible for less than 5% of cases in the pathogenesis of CRC[6]. Mildly or moderately penetrant alleles could explain about 8.3% of etiology in cases with familial aggregation [7], [8]. It is expected that the remaining proportion of inherited susceptibility is likely to be explained by low-risk variants[6]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS), which made possible the genotyping of hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that tag linkage disequilibrium (LD) blocks in the genome, have successfully identified novel susceptibility loci for CRC[9]–[19]. Among these loci, the SNP, rs10795668, located at 10p14, was firstly identified by Tomlinson, IP et al. to be significantly associated with CRC risk in a 4-phase GWAS with 18831 cases and 18540 controls in Europeans[18]. However, another GWAS reported by Peters, U. et al. found no role of this variant in CRC susceptibility by a test set of 2906 cases and 3416 controls and 10 replication sets of 8161 cases and 9101 controls in Europeans[17]. In replication studies, some provided statistical evidence of this SNP for CRC risk [20]–[22], however, much more failed to replicate this association [6], [23]–[28]. Besides, rs10795668 exhibited a population difference among the European, Japanese and African American populations [23]. Since allelic frequency and LD patterns across different populations are different, this variant has to be replicated to ascertain its role in CRC development. The replication studies of the association between rs10795668 polymorphism and CRC have been conducted in Northern, Southern and Hong Kong Chinese [20], [22], [25]. Herein, we performed a replication study comprising 470 cases and 475 controls in Central Chinese. Moreover, a meta-analysis combining the current study and previously published studies about rs10795668 was further conducted to clarify the relationship between this SNP and CRC risk.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the institutional review board of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. And all participants provided written informed consent to participate in this study.

Study populations

The study population consisted of 470 CRC cases with newly diagnosed CRC and 475 cancer-free controls. Patients were consecutively recruited between January 1, 2007 and November 31, 2009 at the Eighth Hospital of Wuhan, central China, which is a hospital specializing in colorectal diseases and absorbing majority of colorectal patients in Wuhan and nearby regions. Controls were cancer-free individuals living in Wuhan city and surrounding regions, who were selected from a pool of healthy volunteers visiting the health check-up center at the same hospital during the same period of the recruitment of CRC patients. The inclusion criteria for patients included histopathologically confirmed CRC, without previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy and no restriction in regards to sex, age or disease stage. Cases with pathology report designated familial adenomatous polyposis, inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal adenoma, Lynch syndrome, intestinal tuberculosis and schistosomiasis were not eligible. The selection criteria for controls included cancer-free individuals and frequency matched to cases by sex and age (±5 years). All subjects were unrelated ethnic Han Chinese. Demographic and lifestyle information, and medical data were collected by trained interviewers via direct interview using standardized questionnaires. Clinical data were abstracted from hospital medical records. 5-ml peripheral venous blood was drawn from each participant.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood sample using the RelaxGene Blood System DP319-02 (Tiangen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The rs10795668 SNP was genotyped by using the Sequenom MassARRAY platform (Sequenom San diego, CA, USA). Genotypes were called using MassARRAY Typer 4.0 software [29], [30]. To ensure quality control, 5% duplicated samples were randomly selected to assess the reproducibility, with a concordance rate of 100%.

Statistical analysis

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was tested by a goodness-of-fit χ test to compare the observed genotype frequencies to the expected genotype frequencies in controls. Pearson's χ test was used to compare the differences in distribution of categorical variables (sex, smoking status, alcohol use and family history of cancer) and Student's t-test was used for continuous variables [age and body weight index (BMI)]. For the SNP with minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.35, the power of our sample size was calculated to be 0.72 to detect an OR of 0.7 in case-control study. For the main effect of rs10795668, unconditional Logistical Regression was conducted to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for potential confounders (age, sex, smoking status, alcohol use and BMI). ORs and 95% CIs as the metrics of effect size were calculated for genotypes AG versus GG and AA versus GG. In order to avoid the assumption of genetic models, dominant, recessive and additive models were also analyzed. Two-factor gene-environment interaction analyses were evaluated by using likelihood ratio tests comparing nested models with only main effects and models with main effects plus the relevant interaction term. There environmental factors, such as smoking status, alcohol use and BMI, were included in the interaction models. According to the WHO Expert Consultation's conclusion, the BMI cut-off point for overweight for Chinese was set to be 24 kg/m2 [31]. The Bonferroni method was applied for multiple comparison correction. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software 12.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, III) and all P values were two-tailed tested with a significant level at 0.05.

Meta-analysis of rs10795668 in association with CRC risk

To further investigate the association between rs10795668 and CRC risk, a meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement (http://www.prisma-statement.org) (). A systematic literature searching was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE and ISI Web of Science without language restriction up to the end of November, 2012. The search strategy was based on combinations of the terms “rs10795668 or 10p14” and “colorectal cancer or colorectal neoplasm”. To expand the coverage of our searches, we further performed searches in Chinese Biomedical database(CBM) based on the same strategy[32]. In addition, references in retrieved articles were scanned. Reviews, comments, and letters were also checked for additional studies. Searching was performed in duplicate by two independent reviewers (Qin Qin and Li Liu). Studies were included if they met the all of the following criteria: (1) original study; (2) assessment of the association between rs10795668 and CRC risk; (3) case-control or cohort study design; (4) providing odds ratio (OR) with corresponding confidence 95% interval (95%CI) or sufficient data to calculate them; (5) studies of humans; (6) the genotypes of rs10795668 in controls are in HWE. We left out investigations in subjects with Lynch syndrome. Case reports, comments, reviews and editorials were also excluded. If the studies had overlapping subjects, only the study with the largest population was finally included. If more than one geographic or ethnic population were included in one report, each population was considered separately. All data were extracted independently by two reviewers (Qin Qin and Li Liu) and any disagreement was adjudicated by a third author (Rong Zhong). The following information was extracted from each study: first author's name, publication year, study country, ethnicity of study population, study design, study type, genotyping method, numbers of cases and controls, control source, MAF. HWE in controls was estimated again in the meta-analysis by the goodness-of-fit χ test (P<0.01)[33]–[35]. Pooled frequency of A allele of rs10795668 in different ethnic groups was estimated using the inverse variance method described by Thakkinstian A et al.[36]. Statistical heterogeneity across studies included in the meta-analysis was assessed by Cochran's Q-statistic and considered significant at P<0.05[37]. The I statistic was then utilized to estimate heterogeneity quantitatively (I = 0–25%, no heterogeneity; I = 25–50%, moderate heterogeneity; I = 50–75%, large heterogeneity; I = 75–100%, extreme heterogeneity)[38]. The fixed-effects model, by inverse variance method, was used to calculate the pooled estimate when heterogeneity was negligible; otherwise, the random-effects model, by DerSimonian and Laird method was applied [39]. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the influence of each study on overall estimate by sequential removing of each study[40]. Publication bias was estimated by funnel plot and Eegger's test [41], [42]. All statistical analyses were carried out in STATA statistical software (version11.0; Stata Corporation, college Station, Texas) and all P values were two-tailed tested with a significant level at 0.05.

Results

Results of Case-control Study

Population characteristics

The characteristics of the study subjects were detailed in . There were no significant differences in the distribution of age, sex and alcohol use between cases and controls. The mean age [± standard deviation (SD)] was 58.1(±11.6) years old for cases and 58.4(±13.1) years old for controls (P = 0.652). More smokers were observed in cases than in controls (P<0.001). In addition, BMI in cases was significantly higher than in controls (P = 0.023).
Table 1

Characteristics of the study population.

CasesControls
No. (%)No. (%) P
Total470475
Age(years)0.652a
(Mean ± SD)58.1±11.658.4±13.1
Sex0.637b
Male258(54.9)268(56.4)
Female212(45.1)207(43.6)
Smoking status8.000×10−8b
Never292(62.1)371(78.1)
Ever178(37.9)104(21.9)
Alcohol use0.073b
Never309(65.7)338(71.2)
Ever161(34.3)137(28.8)
BMI0.023a
(Mean ± SD)23.23±3.4122.67±3.17

Caculated by Student's t-test;

Caculated by Pearson's χ test.

Caculated by Student's t-test; Caculated by Pearson's χ test.

Association analysis

The genotype data of rs10795668 for cases and controls were shown in . The genotype distribution in controls complied with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P = 0.433). Significant difference in genotype distribution was observed between cases and controls (χ = 9.89, P = 0.007). In the unconditional Logistical Regression model, individuals with the AA genotype showed a significant decreased CRC risk compared with those carrying the GG genotype (OR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.28–0.94). In the allelic model, A allele carriers also showed significantly decreased risk compared to those with the G allele carriers (OR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.52–0.93). Additionally, significantly decreased risk of CRC was also found in additive model, with per-A-allele OR of 0.71 (95%CI: 0.54–0.94). Likewise, significant association between this polymorphism and decreased CRC risk was found in dominant model (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44–0.96). While no significant associations were found for AG versus GG and recessive model.
Table 2

Association between rs10795668 and colorectal cancer risk in a Chinese population.

CaseControl
GenotypeNo. (%)No. (%)Crude OR (95%CI)a P a Adjusted OR (95%CI)b P b
GG230(48.9)186(39.2)1.001.00
AG187(39.8)216(45.5)0.70(0.53–0.92)0.0110.70(0.46–1.06)0.093
AA53(11.3)73(15.3)0.59(0.39–0.88)0.0100.51(0.28–0.94)0.030
A vs. G0.74(0.61–0.89)0.0020.70(0.52–0.93)0.013
Additive model0.75(0.62–0.90)0.0020.71(0.54–0.94)0.017
Dominant model0.67(0.52–0.87)0.0030.65(0.44–0.96)0.030
Recessive model0.70(0.48–1.02)0.0650.61(0.34–1.08)0.088

Crude results without adjustment.

Adjusted by age, sex, smoking status, alcohol use and BMI.

Crude results without adjustment. Adjusted by age, sex, smoking status, alcohol use and BMI.

Two-factor gene-environment interaction analyses

To explore the potential interactions between rs10795668 and smoking status, alcohol use and BMI, we performed two-factor gene-environment interaction analyses by unconditional Logistic Regression. The results were displayed in . No significant interaction was found according to the P value of the interaction term (P≥0.017). Among individuals with BMI≥24 kg/m2, carries with AA and AG genotypes showed significantly decreased risk of CRC compared with those with GG genotype, with an OR of 0.45 (95%CI: 0.22–0.91). However, the association was not found among individuals with BMI<24 kg/m2.
Table 3

Interaction analyses between rs10795668 and environment factors associated with CRC risk.

VariablesOR(95%CI)a P
Total0.65(0.44–0.96)0.030a
Smoking status 0.902b
Never0.63(0.40–1.00)
Ever0.59(0.28–1.24)
Alcohol use 0.940b
Never0.63(0.39–1.01)
Ever0.60(0.29–1.23)
BMI 0.183b
<24 kg/m2 0.79(0.49–1.27)
≥24 kg/m2 0.45(0.22–0.91)

OR of AA + AG vs. GG; derived from unconditional Logistic Regression after adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol use and BMI; P≤0.05 (significant).

P value for the interaction term and the cutoff was 0.017(0.05/3) after the Bonferroni correction.

OR of AA + AG vs. GG; derived from unconditional Logistic Regression after adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol use and BMI; P≤0.05 (significant). P value for the interaction term and the cutoff was 0.017(0.05/3) after the Bonferroni correction.

Results of Meta-analysis

Characteristics of included studies

As shown in , 31 potentially relevant articles were identified and screened, of which, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria. However, after further examination, we excluded 4 studies [26]–[28], [43] for including patients with Lynch syndrome and another 4 studies [44]–[47] for containing overlapping participants with the included studies. Finally, combining the current study, a total of 10 publications [6], [17], [18], [20]–[25] with 14 date sets comprising 39341 cases and 41566 controls were included in the meta-analysis ( ). Of these, 7 studies were conducted in Europeans, 5 in Asians and 2 in African Americans. Genotypes of rs10795668 in controls conformed to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for all included studies (P>0.01).
Figure 1

Flow chart of search strategy and study selection.

Table 4

Characteristics of studies on the association between rs10795668 polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk included in the meta-analysis.

First AuthorYearCountryEthnicityStudy designStudy typeGenotyping methodCasesControlsControl sourceHWEMAF
Tomlinson IP2008MixedEuropeanMixed CCGWASIllumina, KASPar1883118540MixedY0.33
Kupfer SS (African Americans)2009AmericaAfricanCCReplicationSequenom MassARRAY795985PopulationY0.06
Kupfer SS (European Americans)2009AmericaEuropeanCCReplicationSequenom MassARRAY399367PopulationY0.30
Von Holst S2010SwedenEuropeanNested CCReplicationDeCode test17861749PopulationY0.34
Xiong F2010ChinaAsianCCReplicationPCR-RFLP21242124PopulationY0.37
He J(European Americans)2011AmericaEuropeanMixed CCReplicationTaqMan11711534MixedY0.31
He J(African Americans)2011AmericaAfricanMixed CCReplicationTaqMan382510MixedY0.07
He J(Japanese Americans)2011AmericaAsianMixed CCReplicationTaqMan10421426MixedY0.44
Ho JW2011HK, ChinaAsianCCReplicationSequenom MassARRAY892890HospitalY0.38
Peters U (GWAS)2012MixedEuropeanMixed CCGWASIllumina29063416MixedY0.32
Peters U (Replication)2012MixedEuropeanMixed CCReplicationSequenom MassARRAY, TaqMan81619101PopulationYNA
Mates IN2012RomaniaEuropeanCCReplicationDeCode test153182HospitalY0.30
Li FX2012ChinaAsianCCReplicationSequenom MassARRAY229267HospitalY0.34
Current study2012ChinaAsianCCReplicationSequenom MassARRAY470475PopulationY0.38

Abbreviation: HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; MAF, minor allele frequency; CC, case-control study; GWAS, genome-wide association studies; NA, not available.

Abbreviation: HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; MAF, minor allele frequency; CC, case-control study; GWAS, genome-wide association studies; NA, not available.

Frequency of A allele in control populations

No significant heterogeneity were observed in European and African American groups (P = 0.236 and 0.462, respectively). The pooled frequency using the fixed random-effects model were 0.327 (95%CI: 0.322–0.333) in European controls and 0.063 (95%CI: 0.051–0.075) in African American controls. There was significant heterogeneity among the Asian studies (P<0.001), and the pooled frequency was 0.385 (95%CI: 0.352–0.419) under random-effects model. These pooled frequencies were similar to those reported in dbSNP database of 0.353, 0.390 and 0.065 for Europeans, Asians and African Americans, respectively. Because of the different frequency distribution of the SNP rs10795668 across different populations, the meta-analysis was started in each ethnic group separately.

The meta-analysis of rs10795668 in associated with CRC

As shown in , only in Asian group significant evidence of heterogeneity was detected (P = 0.031, I 2 = 62.3%), therefore ORs in Asian group were pooled under random-effects model, and ORs in European and African American group were both pooled under fixed-effects model. Significant association between the variant and CRC risk was found both in European and Asian groups, with ORs of 0.91 (95%CI: 0.89–0.93) ( ) and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.78–0.96) ( ), respectively. While, in African American group, the variant showed borderline inverse association with CRC risk (OR = 1.24, 95%CI: 0.99–1.56) ( ).
Table 5

Meta-analysis results of the rs10795668 in association with colorectal cancer risk.

EthnicityData setsCasesControlsGenetic modelOR(95%CI)a P a Q b P b I2 T c P c
European73340734889Additive model0.91 (0.89–0.93)1.85×10−17 11.420.07647.5%0.630.558
Asian547575182Additive model0.86(0.78–0.96)0.00510.600.03162.3%0.240.823
African American211771495Additive model1.24(0.99–1.56)0.0670.870.3500.0%--

OR and P values were calculated in fixed or random effect model;

Q and P values were calculated from Cochran's Q test;

t and P values were calculated by Egger's test.

Figure 2

The forest plot of association of rs10795668 with colorectal cancer for European group.

Figure 3

The forest plot of association of rs10795668 with colorectal cancer for Asian group.

Figure 4

The forest plot of association of rs10795668 with colorectal cancer for African American group.

OR and P values were calculated in fixed or random effect model; Q and P values were calculated from Cochran's Q test; t and P values were calculated by Egger's test. For the European data sets, additional analysis without the initial study [18] was performed, so as to avoid bias. After excluding the original study's samples, the association between the variant and CRC risk was still significant, with OR of 0.94(95%CI: 0.90–0.98, P = 0.242) ().

Sensitivity analyses

To assess the influence of each individual study on the pooled additive OR, sensitivity analyses was performed by removing the individual study sequentially. As shown in , the pooled ORs were similar before and after deletion of each study, indicating the robust stability of the current results.

Publication bias

Funnel plot and the Egger's test were used to assess publication bias. As reflected in , the shape of the funnel plot seemed symmetrical. And the Egger's test did not detect any publication bias ( ).

Discussion

The SNP rs10795668 located at 10p14 was first revealed to be associated with CRC risk by a multistage GWA study, but inconsistent results have been reported by following studies. The present case-control study found a significant association between rs10795668 polymorphism and CRC risk in Chinese population. Then, the following meta-analysis also suggested that the SNP was significantly associated with CRC risk. This meta-analysis was the first to integrate published GWA studies and replication studies to clarify the effect of rs10795668 variant on CRC risk. The SNP rs10795668 maps to an 82-kb LD block (8.73–8.81 Mb) within 10p14 [18]. Tomlinson IP et al. investigated three additional SNPs in this LD block (rs706771, rs7898455 and rs827405) and found no evidence for more than one disease locus in the region[18]. Like most of risk variants identified by GWAS, rs10795668 resides outside the coding regions of genes. The nearest predicted genes are BC031880, located 0.4 Mb proximal to rs10795668, and LOC389936, located 0.7 Mb distally. Although the variant rs10795668 have been found to be associated with CRC risk, little is known about the function of the SNP. To investigate possible regulatory functions on the expression of neighboring genes, Loo LW conducted cis-expression quantitative trait loci analyses and found an significant association between the low colorectal cancer risk allele (A) for rs10795668 at 10p14 and increased expression of ATP5C1 [48]. ATP5C1 encodes the gamma subunit of the catalytic core (F1) of the mitochondrial ATP synthase, the enzyme complex responsible for ATP synthesis, known to play a central role in cellular respiration. A common event in tumor cells is the metabolic switch from respiration (in the mitochondria) to glycolysis (in the cytosol), often referred as “the Warburg effect” [49]. Multiple mechanisms may initiate this switch, one of which is a decrease in the expression of the beta subunit of ATP synthase (F1) (ATP5B), leading to the disruption of the catalytic function of the ATP synthase complex, an event that has been previously observed in multiple cancer types [50], [51]. The increased expression of ATP5C1 associated with the A allele at rs10795668 would be consistent with maintaining the activities of ATP synthase and cellular respiration and potentially inhibiting tumor progression for colorectal cancer. However, ATP5C1, located at10p15.1, is not the closest neighboring gene. Some studies [52], [53] suggest that the GWAS risk variants may not preferentially regulate genes that are closest. The transcriptional regulatory mechanisms impacted by allelic status may involve complex chromatin confirmation states and function within a tissue specific context. Besides, Most of variants identified by GWAS imply the probability of being in linkage with the “real” causal variants[54], so it is possible that the polymorphism is in linkage disequilibrium with “real” causal loci. What's more, understanding the biological function of these loci, focusing on non-coding variants, perhaps is the greatest challenge in the ‘post-GWAS’ era[55]. The Meta-analysis results showed significant association between the variant rs10795668 and CRC risk both in European and Asian population, but in African Americans the association was borderline significant and in the opposite direction. The pooled A allele frequency across different ethnic population varied. Besides, it was noted that Kupfer SS et al. also found that there was genetic heterogeneity in CRC associations in Americans of African versus European descent[24]. The sensitivity analyses and publication bias assessment indicated the current results from this meta-analysis were reliable. Some limitations in the case-control study and the meta-analysis need to be addressed. First, the sample size of our case-control study was relatively small, resulting in the relatively inadequate statistical power. Second, in the meta-analysis, the number of published studies was still insufficient for the analyses in Asian and African American group, which might mask or exaggerate the possible true association. Third, although significant association between rs10795668 and CRC has been confirmed in this study, the functional experiments have not been done, so whether this variant is protecting remained uncertain. In conclusion, our case–control study in a Chinese population and the meta-analysis verified that the variant rs10795668 was significantly associated with CRC risk. Further functional verification should be conducted to confirm the findings, which may help unravel the underlying mechanisms of this variant in CRC development and progression. The forest plot of association of rs10795668 with colorectal cancer for European group without the original study. (TIF) (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Sensitivity analyses for European group. (TIF) (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Funnel plot of publication bias for European group. (TIF) (TIF) Click here for additional data file. The PRISMA 2009 checklist. (DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  54 in total

1.  A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies.

Authors:  Ammarin Thakkinstian; Patrick McElduff; Catherine D'Este; David Duffy; John Attia
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A genome-wide association study of global gene expression.

Authors:  Anna L Dixon; Liming Liang; Miriam F Moffatt; Wei Chen; Simon Heath; Kenny C C Wong; Jenny Taylor; Edward Burnett; Ivo Gut; Martin Farrall; G Mark Lathrop; Gonçalo R Abecasis; William O C Cookson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-09-16       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Chromosome 8q23.3 and 11q23.1 variants modify colorectal cancer risk in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Juul T Wijnen; Richard M Brohet; Ronald van Eijk; Shanty Jagmohan-Changur; Anneke Middeldorp; Carli M Tops; Mario van Puijenbroek; Margreet G E M Ausems; Encarna Gómez García; Frederik J Hes; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Fred H Menko; Theo A M van Os; Rolf H Sijmons; Senno Verhoef; Anja Wagner; Fokko M Nagengast; Jan H Kleibeuker; Peter Devilee; Hans Morreau; David Goldgar; Ian P Tomlinson; Richard S Houlston; Tom van Wezel; Hans F A Vasen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Adenoma prevalence and cancer risk in familial non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G Lindgren; A Liljegren; E Jaramillo; C Rubio; A Lindblom
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in colorectal cancer: associations with tumor site and TNM stage.

Authors:  Ioan Nicolae Mates; Viorel Jinga; Irma Eva Csiki; Dana Mates; Daniela Dinu; Adrian Constantin; Mariana Jinga
Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.008

6.  Prevalence and incidence of hyperplastic polyps and adenomas in familial colorectal cancer: correlation between the two types of colon polyps.

Authors:  A Liljegren; A Lindblom; S Rotstein; B Nilsson; C Rubio; E Jaramillo
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Single-nucleotide polymorphism associations for colorectal cancer in southern chinese population.

Authors:  Fen-Xia Li; Xue-Xi Yang; Ni-Ya Hu; Hong-Yan Du; Qiang Ma; Ming Li
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Enrichment of low penetrance susceptibility loci in a Dutch familial colorectal cancer cohort.

Authors:  Anneke Middeldorp; Shantie Jagmohan-Changur; Ronald van Eijk; Carli Tops; Peter Devilee; Hans F A Vasen; Frederik J Hes; Richard Houlston; Ian Tomlinson; Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat; Juul T Wijnen; Hans Morreau; Tom van Wezel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  A common genetic risk factor for colorectal and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher A Haiman; Loïc Le Marchand; Jennifer Yamamato; Daniel O Stram; Xin Sheng; Laurence N Kolonel; Anna H Wu; David Reich; Brian E Henderson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-07-08       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Common genetic variants at the CRAC1 (HMPS) locus on chromosome 15q13.3 influence colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Emma Jaeger; Emily Webb; Kimberley Howarth; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Andrew Rowan; Peter Broderick; Axel Walther; Sarah Spain; Alan Pittman; Zoe Kemp; Kate Sullivan; Karl Heinimann; Steven Lubbe; Enric Domingo; Ella Barclay; Lynn Martin; Maggie Gorman; Ian Chandler; Jayaram Vijayakrishnan; Wendy Wood; Elli Papaemmanuil; Steven Penegar; Mobshra Qureshi; Susan Farrington; Albert Tenesa; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; David Kerr; Richard Gray; Julian Peto; Malcolm Dunlop; Harry Campbell; Huw Thomas; Richard Houlston; Ian Tomlinson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-12-16       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  5 in total

1.  Glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk in Chinese population.

Authors:  Zan Teng; Lei Wang; Jingdong Zhang; Shuang Cai; Yunpeng Liu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-11-07

2.  Clinical relevance of 8q23, 15q13 and 18q21 SNP genotyping to evaluate colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Stéphanie Baert-Desurmont; Françoise Charbonnier; Estelle Houivet; Lorena Ippolito; Jacques Mauillon; Marion Bougeard; Caroline Abadie; David Malka; Jacqueline Duffour; Françoise Desseigne; Chrystelle Colas; Pascal Pujol; Sophie Lejeune; Catherine Dugast; Bruno Buecher; Laurence Faivre; Dominique Leroux; Paul Gesta; Isabelle Coupier; Rosine Guimbaud; Pascaline Berthet; Sylvie Manouvrier; Estelle Cauchin; Fabienne Prieur; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Marine Lebrun; Philippe Jonveaux; Jean Chiesa; Olivier Caron; Marie-Emmanuelle Morin-Meschin; Florence Polycarpe-Osaer; Sophie Giraud; Aziz Zaanan; Delphine Bonnet; Ludovic Mansuy; Valérie Bonadona; Salima El Chehadeh; François Duhoux; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Jean-Christophe Saurin; Marie-Agnès Collonge-Rame; Laurence Brugières; Qing Wang; Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets; Jean-Marc Rey; Christine Toulas; Marie-Pierre Buisine; Myriam Bronner; Joanna Sokolowska; Agnès Hardouin; Anne-Françoise Cailleux; Hakim Sebaoui; Julien Blot; Julie Tinat; Jacques Benichou; Thierry Frebourg
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Telomere length in peripheral blood leukocytes is associated with risk of colorectal cancer in Chinese population.

Authors:  Qin Qin; Jingwen Sun; Jieyun Yin; Li Liu; Jigui Chen; Yuxing Zhang; Tingting Li; Yun Shi; Sheng Wei; Shaofa Nie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A comprehensive meta-analysis of genetic associations between five key SNPs and colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Yi Hong; Guoying Wu; Wei Li; Dahai Liu; Kan He
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-08

5.  Japanese genome-wide association study identifies a significant colorectal cancer susceptibility locus at chromosome 10p14.

Authors:  Yusuke Takahashi; Keishi Sugimachi; Ken Yamamoto; Atsushi Niida; Teppei Shimamura; Tetsuya Sato; Masahiko Watanabe; Junichi Tanaka; Shinei Kudo; Kenichi Sugihara; Kazuo Hase; Masato Kusunoki; Kazutaka Yamada; Yasuhiro Shimada; Yoshihiro Moriya; Yutaka Suzuki; Satoru Miyano; Masaki Mori; Koshi Mimori
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.716

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.