Literature DB >> 12630828

Experimental determination of object statistics from noisy images.

Matthew A Kupinski1, Eric Clarkson, John W Hoppin, Liying Chen, Harrison H Barrett.   

Abstract

Modern imaging systems rely on complicated hardware and sophisticated image-processing methods to produce images. Owing to this complexity in the imaging chain, there are numerous variables in both the hardware and the software that need to be determined. We advocate a task-based approach to measuring and optimizing image quality in which one analyzes the ability of an observer to perform a task. Ideally, a task-based measure of image quality would account for all sources of variation in the imaging system, including object variability. Often, researchers ignore object variability even though it is known to have a large effect on task performance. The more accurate the statistical description of the objects, the more believable the task-based results will be. We have developed methods to fit statistical models of objects, using only noisy image data and a well-characterized imaging system. The results of these techniques could eventually be used to optimize both the hardware and the software components of imaging systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12630828      PMCID: PMC1785324          DOI: 10.1364/josaa.20.000421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  11 in total

1.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control.

Authors:  O Schwartz; E P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance.

Authors:  J P Rolland; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Transformation of characteristic functionals through imaging systems.

Authors:  Eric Clarkson; M Kupinski; H Barrett
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Statistical texture synthesis of mammographic images with super-blob lumpy backgrounds.

Authors:  F Bochud; C Abbey; M Eckstein
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  1999-01-04       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability.

Authors:  H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions.

Authors:  H H Barrett; C K Abbey; E Clarkson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model.

Authors:  K J Myers; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance.

Authors:  H H Barrett; J L Denny; R F Wagner; K J Myers
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability.

Authors:  C K Abbey; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Object classification for human and ideal observers.

Authors:  Z Liu; D C Knill; D Kersten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  16 in total

1.  Experimental task-based optimization of a four-camera variable-pinhole small-animal SPECT system.

Authors:  Jacob Y Hesterman; Matthew A Kupinski; Lars R Furenlid; Donald W Wilson
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2005-02-12

2.  Adaptive SPECT.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Lars R Furenlid; Melanie Freed; Jacob Y Hesterman; Matthew A Kupinski; Eric Clarkson; Meredith K Whitaker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Assessment of a fluorescence-enhanced optical imaging system using the Hotelling observer.

Authors:  Amit K Sahu; Amit Joshi; Matthew A Kupinski; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Christoph Hoeschen; Matthew A Kupinski; Mark P Little
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Generalization Evaluation of Machine Learning Numerical Observers for Image Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Mahdi M Kalayeh; Thibault Marin; Jovan G Brankov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.679

6.  Generation of anatomically realistic numerical phantoms for photoacoustic and ultrasonic breast imaging.

Authors:  Yang Lou; Weimin Zhou; Thomas P Matthews; Catherine M Appleton; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Reconstruction-Aware Imaging System Ranking by Use of a Sparsity-Driven Numerical Observer Enabled by Variational Bayesian Inference.

Authors:  Yujia Chen; Yang Lou; Kun Wang; Matthew A Kupinski; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Scanning linear estimation: improvements over region of interest (ROI) methods.

Authors:  Meredith K Kupinski; Eric W Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Approximating the Ideal Observer for Joint Signal Detection and Localization Tasks by use of Supervised Learning Methods.

Authors:  Weimin Zhou; Hua Li; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Characteristic functionals in imaging and image-quality assessment: tutorial.

Authors:  Eric Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.