Literature DB >> 23635285

Monte Carlo study of the effects of system geometry and antiscatter grids on cone-beam CT scatter distributions.

A Sisniega1, W Zbijewski, A Badal, I S Kyprianou, J W Stayman, J J Vaquero, J H Siewerdsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The proliferation of cone-beam CT (CBCT) has created interest in performance optimization, with x-ray scatter identified among the main limitations to image quality. CBCT often contends with elevated scatter, but the wide variety of imaging geometry in different CBCT configurations suggests that not all configurations are affected to the same extent. Graphics processing unit (GPU) accelerated Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are employed over a range of imaging geometries to elucidate the factors governing scatter characteristics, efficacy of antiscatter grids, guide system design, and augment development of scatter correction.
METHODS: A MC x-ray simulator implemented on GPU was accelerated by inclusion of variance reduction techniques (interaction splitting, forced scattering, and forced detection) and extended to include x-ray spectra and analytical models of antiscatter grids and flat-panel detectors. The simulator was applied to small animal (SA), musculoskeletal (MSK) extremity, otolaryngology (Head), breast, interventional C-arm, and on-board (kilovoltage) linear accelerator (Linac) imaging, with an axis-to-detector distance (ADD) of 5, 12, 22, 32, 60, and 50 cm, respectively. Each configuration was modeled with and without an antiscatter grid and with (i) an elliptical cylinder varying 70-280 mm in major axis; and (ii) digital murine and anthropomorphic models. The effects of scatter were evaluated in terms of the angular distribution of scatter incident upon the detector, scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR), artifact magnitude, contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and visual assessment.
RESULTS: Variance reduction yielded improvements in MC simulation efficiency ranging from ∼17-fold (for SA CBCT) to ∼35-fold (for Head and C-arm), with the most significant acceleration due to interaction splitting (∼6 to ∼10-fold increase in efficiency). The benefit of a more extended geometry was evident by virtue of a larger air gap-e.g., for a 16 cm diameter object, the SPR reduced from 1.5 for ADD = 12 cm (MSK geometry) to 1.1 for ADD = 22 cm (Head) and to 0.5 for ADD = 60 cm (C-arm). Grid efficiency was higher for configurations with shorter air gap due to a broader angular distribution of scattered photons-e.g., scatter rejection factor ∼0.8 for MSK geometry versus ∼0.65 for C-arm. Grids reduced cupping for all configurations but had limited improvement on scatter-induced streaks and resulted in a loss of CNR for the SA, Breast, and C-arm. Relative contribution of forward-directed scatter increased with a grid (e.g., Rayleigh scatter fraction increasing from ∼0.15 without a grid to ∼0.25 with a grid for the MSK configuration), resulting in scatter distributions with greater spatial variation (the form of which depended on grid orientation).
CONCLUSIONS: A fast MC simulator combining GPU acceleration with variance reduction provided a systematic examination of a range of CBCT configurations in relation to scatter, highlighting the magnitude and spatial uniformity of individual scatter components, illustrating tradeoffs in CNR and artifacts and identifying the system geometries for which grids are more beneficial (e.g., MSK) from those in which an extended geometry is the better defense (e.g., C-arm head imaging). Compact geometries with an antiscatter grid challenge assumptions of slowly varying scatter distributions due to increased contribution of Rayleigh scatter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23635285      PMCID: PMC3651212          DOI: 10.1118/1.4801895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  60 in total

1.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter.

Authors:  J H Siewerdsen; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Accelerated simulation of cone beam X-ray scatter projections.

Authors:  A P Colijn; F J Beekman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Digimouse: a 3D whole body mouse atlas from CT and cryosection data.

Authors:  Belma Dogdas; David Stout; Arion F Chatziioannou; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT).

Authors:  Willi A Kalender; Yiannis Kyriakou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Algorithm for X-ray scatter, beam-hardening, and beam profile correction in diagnostic (kilovoltage) and treatment (megavoltage) cone beam CT.

Authors:  Jonathan S Maltz; Bijumon Gangadharan; Supratik Bose; Dimitre H Hristov; Bruce A Faddegon; Ajay Paidi; Ali R Bani-Hashemi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Monte Carlo evaluation of kerma at a point for photon transport problems.

Authors:  J F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Absorption and noise in cesium iodide x-ray image intensifiers.

Authors:  J A Rowlands; K W Taylor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The effects of scatter in x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  P M Joseph; R D Spital
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Image-guided radiotherapy via daily online cone-beam CT substantially reduces margin requirements for stereotactic lung radiotherapy.

Authors:  Inga S Grills; Geoffrey Hugo; Larry L Kestin; Ana Paula Galerani; K Kenneth Chao; Jennifer Wloch; Di Yan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  The composition of body tissues.

Authors:  H Q Woodard; D R White
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  34 in total

1.  Characterization of X-ray scattering for various phantoms and clinical breast geometries using breast CT on a dedicated hybrid system.

Authors:  Jainil P Shah; Steve D Mann; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.535

2.  Motion compensation in extremity cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Alejandro Sisniega; Gaurav K Thawait; Delaram Shakoor; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Shadpour Demehri; Wojciech Zbijewski
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Assessment of image quality in soft tissue and bone visualization tasks for a dedicated extremity cone-beam CT system.

Authors:  S Demehri; A Muhit; W Zbijewski; J W Stayman; J Yorkston; N Packard; R Senn; D Yang; D Foos; G K Thawait; L M Fayad; A Chhabra; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Dual-energy cone-beam CT with a flat-panel detector: effect of reconstruction algorithm on material classification.

Authors:  W Zbijewski; G J Gang; J Xu; A S Wang; J W Stayman; K Taguchi; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Influence of exposure factors on the variability of CBCT voxel values: a phantom study.

Authors:  M L Oliveira; D Q Freitas; G M B Ambrosano; F Haiter-Neto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  A model-based scatter artifacts correction for cone beam CT.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Don Vernekohl; Jun Zhu; Luyao Wang; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Enabling machine learning in X-ray-based procedures via realistic simulation of image formation.

Authors:  Mathias Unberath; Jan-Nico Zaech; Cong Gao; Bastian Bier; Florian Goldmann; Sing Chun Lee; Javad Fotouhi; Russell Taylor; Mehran Armand; Nassir Navab
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Transmission characteristics of a two dimensional antiscatter grid prototype for CBCT.

Authors:  Cem Altunbas; Brian Kavanagh; Timur Alexeev; Moyed Miften
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Volume-of-interest Imaging Using Multiple Aperture Devices.

Authors:  W Wang; G J Gang; J H Siewerdsen; J W Stayman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-03-01

10.  Temporal subtraction contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Peymon M Gazi; Shadi Aminololama-Shakeri; Kai Yang; John M Boone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.