PURPOSE: To develop an easily-implemented technique with free publicly-available analysis software to measure the modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise-power spectrum (NPS) of a clinical computed tomography (CT) system from images acquired using a widely-available and standardized American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom. METHODS: Images of the ACR phantom were acquired on a Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash system using a standard adult head protocol: 120 kVp, 300 mAs, and reconstructed voxel size of 0.49 mm × 0.49 mm × 4.67 mm. The radial (axial) MTF was measured using an edge method where the boundary of the third module of the ACR phantom, originally designed to measure uniformity and noise, was used as a circular edge. The 3D NPS was measured using images from this same module and using a previously-described methodology that quantifies noise magnitude and 3D noise correlation. RESULTS: The axial MTF was radially symmetrical and had a value of 0.1 at 0.62 mm(-1). The 3D NPS shape was consistent with the filter-ramp function of filtered-backprojection reconstruction algorithms and previously reported values. The radial NPS peak value was ∼115 HU(2)mm(3) at ∼0.25 mm(-1) and dropped to 0 HU(2)mm(3) by 0.8 mm(-1). CONCLUSIONS: The authors have developed an easily-implementable technique to measure the axial MTF and 3D NPS of clinical CT systems using an ACR phantom. The widespread availability of the phantom along with the free software the authors have provided will enable many different institutions to immediately measure MTF and NPS values for comparison of protocols and systems.
PURPOSE: To develop an easily-implemented technique with free publicly-available analysis software to measure the modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise-power spectrum (NPS) of a clinical computed tomography (CT) system from images acquired using a widely-available and standardized American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom. METHODS: Images of the ACR phantom were acquired on a Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash system using a standard adult head protocol: 120 kVp, 300 mAs, and reconstructed voxel size of 0.49 mm × 0.49 mm × 4.67 mm. The radial (axial) MTF was measured using an edge method where the boundary of the third module of the ACR phantom, originally designed to measure uniformity and noise, was used as a circular edge. The 3D NPS was measured using images from this same module and using a previously-described methodology that quantifies noise magnitude and 3D noise correlation. RESULTS: The axial MTF was radially symmetrical and had a value of 0.1 at 0.62 mm(-1). The 3D NPS shape was consistent with the filter-ramp function of filtered-backprojection reconstruction algorithms and previously reported values. The radial NPS peak value was ∼115 HU(2)mm(3) at ∼0.25 mm(-1) and dropped to 0 HU(2)mm(3) by 0.8 mm(-1). CONCLUSIONS: The authors have developed an easily-implementable technique to measure the axial MTF and 3D NPS of clinical CT systems using an ACR phantom. The widespread availability of the phantom along with the free software the authors have provided will enable many different institutions to immediately measure MTF and NPS values for comparison of protocols and systems.
Authors: Cynthia H McCollough; Michael R Bruesewitz; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Krista Bush; Thomas Ruckdeschel; J Thomas Payne; James A Brink; Robert K Zeman Journal: Med Phys Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Rolf Symons; Amir Pourmorteza; Veit Sandfort; Mark A Ahlman; Tracy Cropper; Marissa Mallek; Steffen Kappler; Stefan Ulzheimer; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Elizabeth C Jones; Ashkan A Malayeri; Les R Folio; David A Bluemke Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Muhammad Shafiq-Ul-Hassan; Geoffrey G Zhang; Dylan C Hunt; Kujtim Latifi; Ghanim Ullah; Robert J Gillies; Eduardo G Moros Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2017-12-14
Authors: Viktor Haase; Katharina Hahn; Harald Schöndube; Karl Stierstorfer; Andreas Maier; Frédéric Noo Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Junfeng Guo; Chao Wang; Kung-Sik Chan; Dakai Jin; Punam K Saha; Jered P Sieren; R G Barr; MeiLan K Han; Ella Kazerooni; Christopher B Cooper; David Couper; John D Newell; Eric A Hoffman Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Christopher P Favazza; Xinhui Duan; Yi Zhang; Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Michael R Bruesewitz; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 3.609