Literature DB >> 25142743

Modulation transfer function measurement of CT images by use of a circular edge method with a logistic curve-fitting technique.

Tomomi Takenaga1, Shigehiko Katsuragawa, Makoto Goto, Masahiro Hatemura, Yoshikazu Uchiyama, Junji Shiraishi.   

Abstract

We propose a method for measuring the modulation transfer function (MTF) of a computed tomography (CT) system by use of a circular edge method with a logistic curve-fitting technique. An American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom was scanned by a Philips Brilliance system, and axial images were reconstructed by the filtered back projection algorithm with a standard reconstruction filter. The radial MTF was measured from a disk image of a rod or cylinder in the ACR phantom by use of the circular edge method. In this study, we applied a logistic curve-fitting technique to an edge-spread function (ESF) to eliminate noise because the edge method is very susceptible to noise in the ESF in a CT image. The circular edge method with the logistic curve-fitting technique provided the MTF without fluctuations due to noise for the entire spatial frequency range. The MTF was not affected by the tube current, the slice thickness, or the disk contrast, which were factors related to the amount of noise in the CT image. However, the MTF was affected by the location of the disk and by the disk size, depending on the average distance from the isocenter to the disk edge. Our results indicated that the MTF measured by the circular edge method with the logistic curve-fitting technique was not susceptible to noise in CT images. Therefore, this method is useful for MTF measurement for not only high-contrast objects, but also low-contrast objects with a large amount of noise.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25142743     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-014-0286-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  13 in total

1.  Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Deriving the modulation transfer function of CT from extremely noisy edge profiles.

Authors:  Issei Mori; Yoshio Machida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-10-07

3.  A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Thibault; Ken D Sauer; Charles A Bouman; Jiang Hsieh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device.

Authors:  E Samei; M J Flynn; D A Reimann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Measurement of the PSF for a CT scanner: appropriate wire diameter and pixel size.

Authors:  E L Nickoloff
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A methodology for image quality evaluation of advanced CT systems.

Authors:  Joshua M Wilson; Olav I Christianson; Samuel Richard; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A simple approach to measure computed tomography (CT) modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise-power spectrum (NPS) using the American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom.

Authors:  Saul N Friedman; George S K Fung; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Modulation transfer function of the EMI CT head scanner.

Authors:  C J Bischof; J C Ehrhardt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner.

Authors:  P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Image quality and dose in computerized tomography: evaluation of four CT scanners.

Authors:  G Borasi; G Castellani; R Domenichini; M Franchini; M Granata; A Torresin; G Tosi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  6 in total

1.  A computer simulation method for low-dose CT images by use of real high-dose images: a phantom study.

Authors:  Tomomi Takenaga; Shigehiko Katsuragawa; Makoto Goto; Masahiro Hatemura; Yoshikazu Uchiyama; Junji Shiraishi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-08-20

2.  Nondestructive cellular-level 3D observation of mouse kidney using laboratory-based X-ray microscopy with paraffin-mediated contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Naoki Kunishima; Raita Hirose; Yoshihiro Takeda; Koichiro Ito; Kengo Furuichi; Kazuhiko Omote
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  A cross-platform survey of CT image quality and dose from routine abdomen protocols and a method to systematically standardize image quality.

Authors:  Christopher P Favazza; Xinhui Duan; Yi Zhang; Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Michael R Bruesewitz; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Effects of kV, filtration, dose, and object size on soft tissue and iodine contrast in dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Andrew M Hernandez; Craig K Abbey; Peymon Ghazi; George Burkett; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Evaluation of three-dimensional iterative image reconstruction in C-arm-based interventional cone-beam CT: A phantom study in comparison with customary reconstruction technique.

Authors:  Shigeru Suzuki; Yoshiaki Katada; Tomoko Takayanagi; Haruto Sugawara; Takuya Ishikawa; Yuzo Yamamoto; Hiroo Wada
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  A comprehensive assessment of physical image quality of five different scanners for head CT imaging as clinically used at a single hospital centre-A phantom study.

Authors:  Patrizio Barca; Fabio Paolicchi; Giacomo Aringhieri; Federica Palmas; Daniela Marfisi; Maria Evelina Fantacci; Davide Caramella; Marco Giannelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.