Literature DB >> 18006597

Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality.

Lee W Goldman1.   

Abstract

This article discusses CT radiation dose, the measurement of CT dose, and CT image quality. The most commonly used dose descriptor is CT dose index, which represents the dose to a location (e.g., depth) in a scanned volume from a complete series of slices. A weighted average of the CT dose index measured at the center and periphery of dose phantoms provides a convenient single-number estimate of patient dose for a procedure, and this value (or a related indicator that includes the scanned length) is often displayed on the operator's console. CT image quality, as in most imaging, is described in terms of contrast, spatial resolution, image noise, and artifacts. A strength of CT is its ability to visualize structures of low contrast in a subject, a task that is limited primarily by noise and is therefore closely associated with radiation dose: The higher the dose contributing to the image, the less apparent is image noise and the easier it is to perceive low-contrast structures. Spatial resolution is ultimately limited by sampling, but both image noise and resolution are strongly affected by the reconstruction filter. As a result, diagnostically acceptable image quality at acceptable doses of radiation requires appropriately designed clinical protocols, including appropriate kilovolt peaks, amperages, slice thicknesses, and reconstruction filters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006597     DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.106.037846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol        ISSN: 0091-4916


  55 in total

1.  Impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose in multidetector CT of large body size adults.

Authors:  Gaurav S Desai; Raul N Uppot; Elaine W Yu; Avinash R Kambadakone; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  CT dose and image quality in the last three scanner generations.

Authors:  Andreas Christe; Johannes Heverhagen; Christoph Ozdoba; Christian Weisstanner; Stefan Ulzheimer; Lukas Ebner
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-28

3.  A comparative evaluation of cone beam CT and micro-CT on trabecular bone structures in the human mandible.

Authors:  J Van Dessel; Y Huang; M Depypere; I Rubira-Bullen; F Maes; R Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Adult patient radiation doses from non-cardiac CT examinations: a review of published results.

Authors:  I Pantos; S Thalassinou; S Argentos; N L Kelekis; G Panayiotakis; E P Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  V Hirschinger; S Hanke; U Hirschfelder; E Hofmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Evaluation of different low-dose multidetector CT and cone beam CT protocols in maxillary sinus imaging: part I-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Abeer A Almashraqi; Eman A Ahmed; Nashwa S Mohamed; Imad H Barngkgei; Nader A Elsherbini; Esam S Halboub
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Can CT scan protocols used for radiotherapy treatment planning be adjusted to optimize image quality and patient dose? A systematic review.

Authors:  Anne T Davis; Antony L Palmer; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Restoration of Full Data from Sparse Data in Low-Dose Chest Digital Tomosynthesis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Donghoon Lee; Hee-Joung Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Accuracy of Low Dose Computed Tomography Scanogram for Measurement of Femoral Version after Locked Intramedullary Nailing.

Authors:  Kristi Lynn Hultman; Rahul Vaidya; Ibraheem Malkawi; Jon Brandon Carlson; Jason Benjamin Wynberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The Influence of X-Ray Computed Tomography Acquisition Parameters on Image Quality and Probability of Detection of Additive Manufacturing Defects.

Authors:  Felix H Kim; Adam L Pintar; Shawn P Moylan; Edward J Garboczi
Journal:  J Manuf Sci Eng       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.