Literature DB >> 19459137

Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue.

Joseph Schmidt1, Gregory J Zelinsky.   

Abstract

Visual search studies typically assume the availability of precise target information to guide search, often a picture of the exact target. However, search targets in the real world are often defined categorically and with varying degrees of visual specificity. In five target preview conditions we manipulated the availability of target visual information in a search task for common real-world objects. Previews were: a picture of the target, an abstract textual description of the target, a precise textual description, an abstract + colour textual description, or a precise + colour textual description. Guidance generally increased as information was added to the target preview. We conclude that the information used for search guidance need not be limited to a picture of the target. Although generally less precise, to the extent that visual information can be extracted from a target label and loaded into working memory, this information too can be used to guide search.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19459137     DOI: 10.1080/17470210902853530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  48 in total

1.  Space-, object-, and feature-based attention interact to organize visual scenes.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Modeling guidance and recognition in categorical search: bridging human and computer object detection.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Yifan Peng; Alexander C Berg; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Modelling eye movements in a categorical search task.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Hossein Adeli; Yifan Peng; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The confirmation and prevalence biases in visual search reflect separate underlying processes.

Authors:  Stephen C Walenchok; Stephen D Goldinger; Michael C Hout
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

6.  Task-relevant perceptual features can define categories in visual memory too.

Authors:  Karla B Antonelli; Carrick C Williams
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

7.  The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-21

8.  More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Annmarie MacNamara; Greg Hajcak Proudfit; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Effects of target typicality on categorical search.

Authors:  Justin T Maxfield; Westri D Stalder; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 10.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.