Literature DB >> 16316285

Visual search and the collapse of categorization.

J David Smith1, Joshua S Redford, Lauren C Gent, David A Washburn.   

Abstract

Categorization researchers typically present single objects to be categorized. But real-world categorization often involves object recognition within complex scenes. It is unknown how the processes of categorization stand up to visual complexity or why they fail facing it. The authors filled this research gap by blending the categorization and visual-search paradigms into a visual-search and categorization task in which participants searched for members of target categories in complex displays. Participants have enormous difficulty in this task. Despite intensive and ongoing category training, they detect targets at near-chance levels unless displays are extremely simple or target categories extremely focused. These results, discussed from the perspectives of categorization and visual search, might illuminate societally important instances of visual search (e.g., diagnostic medical screening). Copyright (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16316285     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  4 in total

1.  Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Michael J Van Wert; Naomi M Kenner; Skyler S Place; Nour Kibbi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

2.  Effects of part-based similarity on visual search: the Frankenbear experiment.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Searching Through the Hierarchy: How Level of Target Categorization Affects Visual Search.

Authors:  Justin T Maxfield; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-11-12

4.  Change detection: training and transfer.

Authors:  John G Gaspar; Mark B Neider; Daniel J Simons; Jason S McCarley; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.