Literature DB >> 24018720

Modelling eye movements in a categorical search task.

Gregory J Zelinsky1, Hossein Adeli, Yifan Peng, Dimitris Samaras.   

Abstract

We introduce a model of eye movements during categorical search, the task of finding and recognizing categorically defined targets. It extends a previous model of eye movements during search (target acquisition model, TAM) by using distances from an support vector machine classification boundary to create probability maps indicating pixel-by-pixel evidence for the target category in search images. Other additions include functionality enabling target-absent searches, and a fixation-based blurring of the search images now based on a mapping between visual and collicular space. We tested this model on images from a previously conducted variable set-size (6/13/20) present/absent search experiment where participants searched for categorically defined teddy bear targets among random category distractors. The model not only captured target-present/absent set-size effects, but also accurately predicted for all conditions the numbers of fixations made prior to search judgements. It also predicted the percentages of first eye movements during search landing on targets, a conservative measure of search guidance. Effects of set size on false negative and false positive errors were also captured, but error rates in general were overestimated. We conclude that visual features discriminating a target category from non-targets can be learned and used to guide eye movements during categorical search.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classification; computational models; eye movement guidance; object detection; realistic objects; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24018720      PMCID: PMC3758201          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  50 in total

1.  Saccade target selection in the superior colliculus during a visual search task.

Authors:  Robert M McPeek; Edward L Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Looking back at Waldo: oculomotor inhibition of return does not prevent return fixations.

Authors:  Tim J Smith; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The guidance of eye movements during active visual search.

Authors:  B C Motter; E J Belky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Using eye saccades to assess the selectivity of search movements.

Authors:  G J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Mary M Hayhoe; Michael F Land; Dana H Ballard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Visual search guidance is best after a short delay.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics.

Authors:  Lingyun Zhang; Matthew H Tong; Tim K Marks; Honghao Shan; Garrison W Cottrell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Searching Through the Hierarchy: How Level of Target Categorization Affects Visual Search.

Authors:  Justin T Maxfield; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-11-12
View more
  17 in total

1.  Attentional selection in visual perception, memory and action: a quest for cross-domain integration.

Authors:  Werner X Schneider; Wolfgang Einhäuser; Gernot Horstmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Modeling peripheral visual acuity enables discovery of gaze strategies at multiple time scales during natural scene search.

Authors:  Pavan Ramkumar; Hugo Fernandes; Konrad Kording; Mark Segraves
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Annmarie MacNamara; Greg Hajcak Proudfit; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Effects of target typicality on categorical search.

Authors:  Justin T Maxfield; Westri D Stalder; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  The what, where, and why of priority maps and their interactions with visual working memory.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; James W Bisley
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Target specificity improves search, but how universal is the benefit?

Authors:  Ashley M Ercolino; Pooja Patel; Corey Bohil; Mark B Neider; Joseph Schmidt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Negative cues minimize visual search specificity effects.

Authors:  Ashley M Phelps; Robert G Alexander; Joseph Schmidt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 1.984

Review 8.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Searching for Category-Consistent Features: A Computational Approach to Understanding Visual Category Representation.

Authors:  Chen-Ping Yu; Justin T Maxfield; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-05-03

10.  Attention in natural scenes: contrast affects rapid visual processing and fixations alike.

Authors:  Bernard Marius 't Hart; Hannah Claudia Elfriede Fanny Schmidt; Ingo Klein-Harmeyer; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.