Literature DB >> 21295053

Visual search guidance is best after a short delay.

Joseph Schmidt1, Gregory J Zelinsky.   

Abstract

Search displays are typically presented immediately after a target cue, but in the real-world, delays often exist between target designation and search. Experiments 1 and 2 asked how search guidance changes with delay. Targets were cued using a picture or text label, each for 3000ms, followed by a delay up to 9000ms before the search display. Search stimuli were realistic objects, and guidance was quantified using multiple eye movement measures. Text-based cues showed a non-significant trend towards greater guidance following any delay relative to a no-delay condition. However, guidance from a pictorial cue increased sharply 300-600ms after preview offset. Experiment 3 replicated this guidance enhancement using shorter preview durations while equating the time from cue onset to search onset, demonstrating that the guidance benefit is linked to preview offset rather than a more complete encoding of the target. Experiment 4 showed that enhanced guidance persists even with a mask flashed at preview offset, suggesting an explanation other than visual priming. We interpret our findings as evidence for the rapid consolidation of target information into a guiding representation, which attains its maximum effectiveness shortly after preview offset.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21295053      PMCID: PMC3063447          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  42 in total

1.  Visual memory for random block patterns defined by luminance and color contrast.

Authors:  F W Cornelissen; M W Greenlee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Tracking multiple items through occlusion: clues to visual objecthood.

Authors:  B J Scholl; Z W Pylyshyn
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Change detection.

Authors:  Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Visual memory and motor planning in a natural task.

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe; Anurag Shrivastava; Ryan Mruczek; Jeff B Pelz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The time course of consolidation in visual working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays.

Authors:  Marc Pomplun
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Task constraints in visual working memory.

Authors:  M M Hayhoe; D G Bensinger; D H Ballard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies.

Authors:  R D Gordon; D E Irwin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-11

9.  The persistence of object file representations.

Authors:  Nicholaus S Noles; Brian J Scholl; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-02

10.  Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

1.  Modelling eye movements in a categorical search task.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Hossein Adeli; Yifan Peng; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Annmarie MacNamara; Greg Hajcak Proudfit; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Extrafoveal preview benefit during free-viewing visual search in the monkey.

Authors:  B Suresh Krishna; Anna E Ipata; James W Bisley; Jacqueline Gottlieb; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  The what, where, and why of priority maps and their interactions with visual working memory.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; James W Bisley
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Are all real-world objects created equal? Estimating the "set-size" of the search target in visual working memory.

Authors:  Michael T Miuccio; Gregory J Zelinsky; Joseph Schmidt
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Searching Through the Hierarchy: How Level of Target Categorization Affects Visual Search.

Authors:  Justin T Maxfield; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-11-12

7.  Priming and the guidance by visual and categorical templates in visual search.

Authors:  Anna Wilschut; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-24

8.  Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Floor de Groot; Falk Huettig; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Look before you seek: Preview adds a fixed benefit to all searches.

Authors:  Sricharan Sunder; S P Arun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.