Literature DB >> 26180505

Are summary statistics enough? Evidence for the importance of shape in guiding visual search.

Robert G Alexander1, Joseph Schmidt2, Gregory J Zelinsky3.   

Abstract

Peripheral vision outside the focus of attention may rely on summary statistics. We used a gaze-contingent paradigm to directly test this assumption by asking whether search performance differed between targets and statistically-matched visualizations of the same targets. Four-object search displays included one statistically-matched object that was replaced by an unaltered version of the object during the first eye movement. Targets were designated by previews, which were never altered. Two types of statistically-matched objects were tested: One that maintained global shape and one that did not. Differences in guidance were found between targets and statistically-matched objects when shape was not preserved, suggesting that they were not informationally equivalent. Responses were also slower after target fixation when shape was not preserved, suggesting an extrafoveal processing of the target that again used shape information. We conclude that summary statistics must include some global shape information to approximate the peripheral information used during search.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extrafoveal processing; Eye movements; Gaze contingent; Shape; Summary statistics; Visual search guidance

Year:  2014        PMID: 26180505      PMCID: PMC4500174          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2014.890989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  32 in total

1.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.

Authors:  L Parkes; J Lund; A Angelucci; J A Solomon; M Morgan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Spatial scaling factors explain eccentricity effects on face ERPs.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Jesse S Husk; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition.

Authors:  Aude Oliva; Antonio Torralba
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

4.  The three dimensions of human visual sensitivity to first-order contrast statistics.

Authors:  Charles Chubb; Jong-Ho Nam; Daniel R Bindman; George Sperling
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Critical color differences determined with a visual search task.

Authors:  A L Nagy; R R Sanchez
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Visual similarity effects in categorical search.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search.

Authors:  G J Zelinsky; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search.

Authors:  Ruth Rosenholtz; Jie Huang; Alvin Raj; Benjamin J Balas; Livia Ilie
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Searching Through the Hierarchy: How Level of Target Categorization Affects Visual Search.

Authors:  Justin T Maxfield; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-11-12

Review 10.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition.

Authors:  David Whitney; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Mandating Limits on Workload, Duty, and Speed in Radiology.

Authors:  Robert Alexander; Stephen Waite; Michael A Bruno; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Leonard Berlin; Stephen Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 29.146

2.  Negative cues minimize visual search specificity effects.

Authors:  Ashley M Phelps; Robert G Alexander; Joseph Schmidt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 1.984

3.  The role of scene summary statistics in object recognition.

Authors:  Tim Lauer; Tim H W Cornelissen; Dejan Draschkow; Verena Willenbockel; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Global and high-level effects in crowding cannot be predicted by either high-dimensional pooling or target cueing.

Authors:  Alban Bornet; Oh-Hyeon Choung; Adrien Doerig; David Whitney; Michael H Herzog; Mauro Manassi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Gaze mechanisms enabling the detection of faint stars in the night sky.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Ronald J Mintz; Paul J Custodio; Stephen L Macknik; Alipasha Vaziri; Ashwin Venkatakrishnan; Sofya Gindina; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.698

6.  Search performance is better predicted by tileability than presence of a unique basic feature.

Authors:  Honghua Chang; Ruth Rosenholtz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Occluded information is restored at preview but not during visual search.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  What do radiologists look for? Advances and limitations of perceptual learning in radiologic search.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Stephen Waite; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.