The capacity of metal-dependent fungal and bacterial polysaccharide oxygenases, termed GH61 and CBM33, respectively, to potentiate the enzymatic degradation of cellulose opens new possibilities for the conversion of recalcitrant biomass to biofuels. GH61s have already been shown to be unique metalloenzymes containing an active site with a mononuclear copper ion coordinated by two histidines, one of which is an unusual τ-N-methylated N-terminal histidine. We now report the structural and spectroscopic characterization of the corresponding copper CBM33 enzymes. CBM33 binds copper with high affinity at a mononuclear site, significantly stabilizing the enzyme. X-band EPR spectroscopy of Cu(II)-CBM33 shows a mononuclear type 2 copper site with the copper ion in a distorted axial coordination sphere, into which azide will coordinate as evidenced by the concomitant formation of a new absorption band in the UV/vis spectrum at 390 nm. The enzyme's three-dimensional structure contains copper, which has been photoreduced to Cu(I) by the incident X-rays, confirmed by X-ray absorption/fluorescence studies of both aqueous solution and intact crystals of Cu-CBM33. The single copper(I) ion is ligated in a T-shaped configuration by three nitrogen atoms from two histidine side chains and the amino terminus, similar to the endogenous copper coordination geometry found in fungal GH61.
The capacity of metal-dependent fungal and bacterial polysaccharideoxygenases, termed GH61 and CBM33, respectively, to potentiate the enzymatic degradation of cellulose opens new possibilities for the conversion of recalcitrant biomass to biofuels. GH61s have already been shown to be unique metalloenzymes containing an active site with a mononuclearcopper ion coordinated by two histidines, one of which is an unusual τ-N-methylated N-terminal histidine. We now report the structural and spectroscopic characterization of the corresponding copperCBM33 enzymes. CBM33 binds copper with high affinity at a mononuclearsite, significantly stabilizing the enzyme. X-band EPR spectroscopy of Cu(II)-CBM33 shows a mononuclear type 2 coppersite with the copper ion in a distorted axial coordination sphere, into which azide will coordinate as evidenced by the concomitant formation of a new absorption band in the UV/vis spectrum at 390 nm. The enzyme's three-dimensional structure contains copper, which has been photoreduced to Cu(I) by the incident X-rays, confirmed by X-ray absorption/fluorescence studies of both aqueous solution and intact crystals of Cu-CBM33. The single copper(I) ion is ligated in a T-shaped configuration by three nitrogen atoms from two histidineside chains and the amino terminus, similar to the endogenous copper coordination geometry found in fungal GH61.
Controlled degradation
of abundant biomass is a sine qua non for
the future success of bioethanol production.[1−5] In this regard, finding a means of overcoming the
recalcitrance of cellulosic, lignocellulosic, or chitinotic materials
either by chemical or by enzymatic methods is a major objective. Of
these methods enzymatic solutions offer promise especially as recent
months have seen strides toward a fuller appreciation of the consortia
of ligninases, cellulases, and chitinases deployed by saprophytes
and heterotrophs in the degradation of biomass.[2,6−9] In this context, an important recent advance was the discovery of
a class of enzymatic oxidases, and their action on polysaccharides,
reported by Harris et al.[10] and Vaaje-Kolstad et al.,[11] who demonstrated
that effective fungal and bacterial depolymerization of polysaccharides
hinges upon the initial action of structure-disrupting enzymes classified[12] as GH61 and CBM33, respectively. Subsequently,
it was shown that GH61s from Thermoascus aurantiacus and Thielavia terrestrisare new
types of copper-dependent oxidases with an unusual active site, where
the copper ion is bound by two histidines of the so-called histidine
brace (Figure 1).[13] This finding was confirmed for fungal GH61s from Neurospora crassa(14,15) and Phanerochaete chrysosporium.[16] The active site is notable for its τ-N-methylated N-terminal
histidine, the functional requirement of which is unclear. It is also
similar to part of the copper active site of particulate methane monoxygenase,
another powerful copper oxidase.[17]
Figure 1
Active site structure
of Cu(II)-GH61 showing conserved residues.
Site-directed mutagenesis of the coordinated tyrosine/ate leads to
reduction in activity, while mutation of glutamine leads to inactivation.[10] Cu–N(term-his) = 1.9, Cu–N(his)
= 2.1, Cu–NH2 = 2.2, Cu···O(Tyr)
= 2.9 Å.
In contrast to GH61, however, and despite their potential for biofuel
production, the structural and mechanistic details of CBM33 enzymes
are less certain. While initial structural reports[11] suggested that Na+, Zn2+, or Mg2+ might be the metal at the active site, these have now been
shown to be incorrect as the activity of a bacterial CBM33 from Enterococcus faecalis(18,19) was recently
demonstrated also to be copper-dependent.Active site structure
of Cu(II)-GH61 showing conserved residues.
Site-directed mutagenesis of the coordinated tyrosine/ate leads to
reduction in activity, while mutation of glutamine leads to inactivation.[10] Cu–N(term-his) = 1.9, Cu–N(his)
= 2.1, Cu–NH2 = 2.2, Cu···O(Tyr)
= 2.9 Å.A recent NMR structure
(PDB 2LHS) of
a CBP21 CBM33 showed that the overall
solution structure of CBP21 is similar to that of the crystallized
enzyme, but while Cu perturbs the histidine NMR signals (allowing
pKa determination) showing the expected
coordination of copper at the active site, no details of the copper
coordination geometry could be determined from this study.[20] Also awaiting fuller elucidation is an understanding
of the difference in mechanisms of action of CBM33 and GH61. For instance,
analysis of the degradation products from the action of GH61 indicates
oxidation at C1, C4, or C6 of the glycosidic unit, dependent on the
subclass of GH61 carrying out the oxidation.[21] In these cases, GH61 action affords a linear sequence of oligosaccharide
products with degrees of polymerization (dp) = 2,3,4,5,etc.[13,16,22] In contrast, where studied, CBM33
oxidation appears only to occur at C1 and affords principally oligosaccharides
with dp = 2,4,6,etc.[18,23]From a structural perspective,
both enzyme classes exhibit an overall
structure with a beta-sandwich core, which lies roughly perpendicular
to an extended flat face, the center of which contains the active
site. For GH61, substrate-binding at the face is thought to be mediated
mainly by aromatic–carbohydrate interactions.[24,21] In CBM33, a lack of aromatic amino acid side chains at the binding
site suggests that binding to polysaccharides is mediated through
different interactions exemplified by proposals for the interaction
of the “CBP21” chitin-binding CBM33.[23]Both GH61 and CBM33 have a functional requirement
for a reducing
equivalent, either a sugar dehydrogenase exemplified by cellobiose
dehydrogenase[14,22,25,26] or a small molecule reductant,[13] which, along with the need for dioxygen, is
commensurate with a catalytic cycle in which dioxygen activation at
a reduced coppersite is a key step. Indeed, through further structural
studies of an oxygenated form of a Cu-GH61 and in parallel with other
known copperoxygenases such as peptidyl glycine monoxygenase,[27] Marletta et al. speculated on a reaction sequence
for GH61 in which, following the formation of a copper(I) state and
addition of dioxygen, copper(II)-superoxide is a potential oxidative
species.[14,15] This proposal is based on a structure of
GH61, which shows the copper ion coordinated in an axially elongated
geometry, with the equatorial plane occupied by the three nitrogen
atoms of the histidine brace. A water molecule occupies one axial
position, and the other axial position has electron density that is
assigned to a superoxide with a Cu···O distance of
2.9 Å.[28] Notwithstanding this structure,
in-depth mechanistic studies are urgently required to examine not
only the proposal of a copper-superoxide but also, and perhaps more
importantly, whether other types of reactive copper–oxygen
species could be formed as part of the reaction cycle.As part
of the continuing drive toward understanding the mechanisms
of action of GH61s and CBM33s, we report here the isolation, characterization,
and full three-dimensional X-ray structures of the apo and copper-bound forms of a CBM33 from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. As initially demonstrated by Aachmann et al., we confirm that copper(II)
binding to the apo enzyme is very tight indeed, and
we further show that copper binding is accompanied by a substantial
increase in protein stability.[20] Additionally,
using EPR spectroscopy, we reveal details of the copper coordination
sphere, which, in contrast to GH61, shows the copper ion in a coordination
geometry significantly distorted from axial, such that it lies somewhat
between the usual Peisach–Blumberg type 1 and type 2 classifications.[29] Three-dimensional structure and X-ray absorption
spectroscopy studies of the reduced form display a copper(I) ion in
a T-shaped coordination geometry, where the copper has been photoreduced
by the incident X-rays.
Results and Discussion
Protein Isolation, Isothermal
Calorimetry, and Thermal Stability
The Bacillus
amyloliquefaciensCBM33
domain, (first described as chitin-binding protein ChbB from a chitinolytic
strain of B. amyloliquefaciens;[30] hereafter BaCBM33), was produced
from expression of the codon-optimized gene and subsequent periplasmic
secretion in E. coli allowing processing
of the signal peptide to yield the free N-terminal histidine. Standard
purification with Q Sepharose and Superdex columns yielded good quantities
of pure protein.Copper(II) binding to apo-BaCBM33 was followed using isothermal titration calorimetry
(ITC) at 298 K, at pHs 5, 6, and 7. Copper binding has an apparent KD of 6 nM at pH 5 (c value
>1000), which is comparable to the value of 55 nM recently found
for
the binding of Cu(II) to CBP21.[20] Copper(II)
affinity is lower at higher pH giving KD values of 40 nM at pH 6 (c value = 325) and 80
nM at pH 7 (c = 435), with a copper to protein stoichiometry
of approximately 0.8:1 (Figure 2). The small
increase in KD with pH is possibly due
to competition for copper binding from the buffers used at higher
pH or potentially from the deprotonation of active site residues involved
in the stabilization of a metal-bound water molecule (see below for
further discussion), although the reasons for these differences await
a more detailed binding study. In either case, binding of copper to
the enzyme is rapid and tight.
Figure 2
Isothermal calorimetry of metal binding
to BaCBM33:
(A) Cu(II) at pH 6 (see Figure S1 for other
pH measurements), (B) Zn(II) at pH 5.
Isothermal calorimetry of metal binding
to BaCBM33:
(A) Cu(II) at pH 6 (see Figure S1 for other
pH measurements), (B) Zn(II) at pH 5.Binding of nickel(II), manganese(II), and zinc(II) at pH
5 was
also investigated using ITC, with Zn(II) the only metal showing any
measurable binding (Figure 2). To corroborate
ITC data, the thermostability of the protein was measured in the presence
of these metals. In the presence of Cu(II), the melting temperature
(Tm) increased by 20 K (Figure S2), while in the presence of Ni(II) and Zn(II), a
less significant shift of 7 K was observed reflecting the lower affinity
of CBM33 for these metals. Mn(II) had no impact on the Tm, suggesting no binding at all. The potential binding
of manganese ions was of interest because there is a single report
of GH61 using Mn as a metal ion in the absence of copper.[16] However, in the case of BaCBM33,
no Mn binding could be detected, strongly suggesting that CBM33sare
uniquely copper enzymes. We also note that the enzyme does not bind
further copper ions with any significant binding constant, analogous
to GH61s and commensurate with the active site in CBM33s being a mononuclearcopper active site, and in contrast to the dicoppersite proposed
for copper methane monoxygenase in which the histidine brace also
appears. Such selective binding of a single copper corroborates the
recent reports from activity assays that CBM33s should be classified
as mononuclearcopper-dependent oxygenases.[19]
Three-Dimensional Structure from X-ray Diffraction
To investigate
the nature of the structure of BaCBM33 in more detail
and, in particular, the coppersite, the three-dimensional
structures of BaCBM33 in apo, copper-bound,
and copper-bound/ascorbate-soaked forms were solved by molecular replacement
at resolutions of 1.8, 1.9, and 1.7 Å, respectively. The structures
are analogous to those already reported for CBM33 and GH61 consisting
of a core immunoglobin-like β-sandwich domain with an adjacent
helical bundle (defined as loop L2 in GH61s, Figure 3).[21] As with GH61, the N-terminal
active site is at the center of an extended flat surface (ca. 30 ×
40 Å), which is formed by the helical bundle and the narrow end
of the β-sandwich. This surface presumably interacts in a face-to-face
manner with the surface of the substrate, bringing the copper into
close contact with the polysaccharide.
Figure 3
Structural representation
of Cu-BaCBM33, showing
copper active site on binding face.
Structural representation
of Cu-BaCBM33, showing
copper active site on binding face.Structural variation between the active sites of the apo and both copper-bound forms is minimal, revealing a
degree of preorganization
for copper binding (Figure S3), consistent
with the high copper-binding affinity. In the copper-bound form at
the N-terminal histidine active site, well-defined electron density
consistent with a single, fully occupied copper ion was found, coordinated
in a T-shaped configuration of the histidine brace by the nitrogen
atoms of two histidineside chains and the amino terminus [∠Nhis–Cu–NH2 = 96° and ∠NH2–Cu–Nhis = 98°], with Cu–Nhis distances of 2.0 and 2.0 Å and a longer Cu–N
(amino terminus) distance of 2.3 Å (Figure 4). Unlike GH61, there is no tyrosine/ate present in the apical position
of the coordination sphere, which is replaced by a phenylalanine in
CBM33. Additionally, in contrast to GH61, the N-terminal histidine
is not τ-N-methylated. These differences, if indeed present
in the wild-type enzyme, would amount to a significant variance in
the active site electronics of the coppersite in CBM33 and point
toward differing mechanisms of action between the two enzymes, possibly
dictated by the oxidation requirements of different natural substrates.
Figure 4
Top: Electron
density map contoured at 1σ in the active site
of Cu-BaCBM33; see Figure S4 for stereo view. Bottom: Line diagram of active site; cf., Figure 1 for comparison to active site of GH61.
Top: Electron
density map contoured at 1σ in the active site
of Cu-BaCBM33; see Figure S4 for stereo view. Bottom: Line diagram of active site; cf., Figure 1 for comparison to active site of GH61.Surprisingly, no further significant electron density
(>0.3 σ)
was found in the primary coordination sphere of the putative copper(II)
ion, inconsistent with the dearth of known small molecule T-shaped
copper(II) complexes. Indeed, only one genuine copper(II) complex
in a N3 T-shaped geometry is known, and in this complex
the EPR spin Hamiltonian values are markedly different from those
of Cu(II)-BaCBM33 (see below for further discussion).[31,32] The T-shaped coordination geometry in the structure of Cu-BaCBM33 is, however, consistent with a copper(I) formulation,
especially because there is no difference in copper coordination sphere
when the crystals are soaked with sodium ascorbate and the structure
redetermined. The possibility of a reduced copper oxidation state
is corroborated by small molecule studies of copper-bis(pyrazolyl)
amine ligands, where the nitrogen atoms of the ligand occupy a T-shaped
configuration, and studies of three coordinatecopper in histidylhistidine
complexes, both of which also have high redox potentials.[33,34]
X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy Studies of Copper Oxidation State
To confirm the presence of copper(I) in the structures, we performed
a Cu K-edge XANES study both of the in situ crystal during diffraction
data collection and of an aqueous solution of Cu(II)BaCBM33 at pH 5 both before and after exposure to synchrotron X-rays
(Figure 5). X-ray exposure of a 0.6 mM solution
of Cu(II)-BaCBM33 at pH 5 led to the rapid (after
a single scan) formation of a pre-edge feature at 8982–3 eV.
This feature could also be generated from the addition of a solution
of reducing agent (sodium ascorbate at pH 5), which is further known
to afford an EPR silent species. The XANES absorption at 8983 eV is
assigned to a 1s to nonbonded 4p transition of a coordinatively unsaturated
copper(I) ion; this transition is a reliable marker of copper oxidation
state and also of low (<4) coordination number.[34−37] Moreover, in this case, the profile
of the pre-edge region matches closely to that of a known small molecule
copper(I) complex in which the copper ion is coordinated in T-shaped
configuration formed by two trans pyrazolyls and one bridgehead amine,[38,39] directly analogous to the observed copper structure in Cu-BaCBM33.
Figure 5
Left: 0.6 mM Cu-BaCBM33 solution at pH
5 (1 eV
steps). Right: In crystallo (0.5 eV steps), successive Cu K-edge XANES
fluorescence spectra (black line followed by red line) showing growth
of pre-edge peak at 8982–3 eV. Blue spectrum (offset in ordinate
for clarity) is that of Cu-BaCBM33 solution/crystal
pretreated with sodium ascorbate solution.
Left: 0.6 mM Cu-BaCBM33 solution at pH
5 (1 eV
steps). Right: In crystallo (0.5 eV steps), successive Cu K-edge XANES
fluorescence spectra (black line followed by red line) showing growth
of pre-edge peak at 8982–3 eV. Blue spectrum (offset in ordinate
for clarity) is that of Cu-BaCBM33 solution/crystal
pretreated with sodium ascorbate solution.To link the crystallographic and solution phase studies,
we performed
fluorescence XANES studies of the in situ crystal. Notwithstanding
their relatively low signal-to-noise, these spectra display the same
pre-edge feature and behavior as that observed in solution. We therefore
infer that the BaCBM33copper-bound structure is
of the copper(I) form, where the copper ion has been unavoidably photoreduced
by the X-rays. This observation underlines the need for very considerable
caution in the interpretation of oxidation state and coordination
geometry in the X-ray structures of copper enzymes that contain the
copperhistidine brace structure, a point convincingly made some years
ago by Somerhalter et al.[40] and a feature
of the early structures of CBM33 and GH61, which goes some way to
explain the confusion about the identity of the metal ion.[10,11]
Redox Studies of CuBaCBM33
The ostensibly
high redox potential of CuBaCBM33 implied from the
XAS studies was investigated using the method of titration of Cu(II)-BaCBM33 against a range of redox-active dyes with known
redox potentials, indicating a redox potential for CuBaCBM33 of between ∼275 and 370 mV (Figure
S7). Recent studies of a Cu-CBP21 yielded a comparable value
of the redox couple of ca. 275 mV at pH 6 (vs SHE).[20]The relatively high potential is expected from the
low coordination number of the copper ion in CBM33. This has also
been observed in studies of copper histidylhistidine complexes.[34] Furthermore, low coordinatecopper(I) centers
have been proposed to be the sites of reactive-oxygen-species (ROS)
production in copper amyloid-β fragments.[36] In both cases, the redox potential of the copper(I) complex
and its reactivity toward dioxygen is critically dependent on the
balance of three coordinate versus two coordinatecopper(I), which,
in the context of GH61 and CBM33, implies a significant role in oxygen
activation for the central amino terminus in the coordination sphere
of the copper ion. Additionally, the principal ROS product in copper
amyloid-β fragments appears to be peroxide rather than superoxide,
requiring the presence of a redox-active tyrosine/ate within the peptide
fragment. A similarsituation could occur within GH61 and CBM33, both
of which have conserved tyrosines or tryptophans within their sequences
(see below).[19,21]
X-Band EPR Spectroscopy
of met-CuBaCBM33 and Azide Binding
Studies
In the absence of structural
information from X-ray crystallography, the nature of the copper(II)site in Cu(II)-BaCBM33 was investigated using frozen
solution X-band EPR spectroscopy at 155 K. Cu(II)-BaCBM33 exhibits a rhombic spectral envelope (g ≠ g ≠ g) but where the SOMO has significant d(x2–y2) character, indicating
a mononuclearcopper(II) ion in a single binding site (Figure 6) with distorted-axial coordination geometry. Simulation
of the spectrum was hampered by the second-order nature of the perpendicular
region, making a determination of the g and g and |A| and |A| tensor values unreliable.
Spin Hamiltonian tensor values in the parallel direction, however,
could be modeled accurately with g = 2.25 and |A| = 125 G (0.0135 cm–1). These values place Cu(II)-BaCBM33 between the usual Peisach–Blumberg classifications
of type 1 and type 2 copper enzymes, although the overall axial envelope
of the EPR signal would suggest that a type 2 classification is appropriate.[29] The somewhat low |A| value in combination with low g could arise from increased metal–ligand
covalency or, more likely given the rhombicity of the spectrum and
the potential absence of ligands on the z-axis (see
structure discussion below), a coordination geometry at the copper
that is distorted away from a local axial symmetry, possibly by the
coordination of one or two water molecules, neither of which is directly
trans to the amino terminus. This distortion allows the SOMO to mix
with 3d(z2) and/or 4s orbitals, affording
a greater relative contribution of spin-dipolar and/or Fermi contact
terms to the hyperfine coupling.[41,42] Additional
evidence for a distorted coordination geometry comes from noting the
similarity of the g and
|A| values for Cu(II)-BaCBM33 with those of the coppersite in Cu–Znsuperoxide
dismutase, in which the copper has a distorted square planar coordination
geometry.[43] Furthermore, an existing X-ray
structure of a CBP21, which, despite the incorrect assignment of the
metal ion as Na+ at the active site (PDB entry 2BEM), exhibits a distorted
square planar coordination at the metal where the three nitrogen atoms
of the histidine brace and the metal ion occupy a plane and where
a water molecule in the fourth coordination site is significantly
deviated from this plane.[11]
Figure 6
X-Band (9 GHz, 155 K)
EPR spectrum (top) with simulation in red
(bottom) of Cu(II)BaCBM33 at pH 5 (15% v/v glycerol).
X-Band (9 GHz, 155 K)
EPR spectrum (top) with simulation in red
(bottom) of Cu(II)BaCBM33 at pH 5 (15% v/v glycerol).Addition of sodium azide to a
solution of Cu(II)BaCBM33 at pH 5 affords changes
in both UV/vis and EPR spectra. In
the latter, addition of stoichiometric azide gives a shift in g to 2.23 and |A| to 0.0125 cm–1,
but no change in the overall spectral envelope. Addition of a 10-fold
excess of azide affords a significant change with the formation of
new peaks but with loss of some of the fine structure (Figure S5), indicative of coordination to the
copper(II) center. In the UV/vis spectrum, a single intense band (ca.
900 dm3 mol–1 cm–1)
appears at ∼390 nm assignable to an azide to copper charge
transfer band at a mononuclearcoppersite.[44] The appearance of this band is accompanied by a small increase in
the intensity of the d–d transition absorption of the Cu(II)
center at ca. 690 nm (Figure 6).There
are distinct differences in the EPR spectrum of Cu(II)-BaCBM33 and that of Cu(II)-TaGH61. In the
latter, the g and |A| values of 2.27 and 0.0162
cm–1 place GH61 squarely within the type 2 classification
of coppersite and are also indicative of a copper(II) ion within
an axial coordination geometry. This geometry was confirmed by the
subsequent X-ray diffraction studies of GH61. It is currently unclear
why there are such differences in the coordination geometries of the met forms of both CBM33 and GH61, but the difference is
likely to be of functional significance given the differences in the
copper active site structures of CBM33 and GH61 (see below).
Sequence
Conservation Analysis of CBM33s and Comparison to CBP21
and GH61s
An amino acid sequence alignment of BaCBM33 with a range of selected CBM33s is shown in Figure S6. Outside the active site histidines, strict conservation
is observed in parts of the β-sandwich and in a collection of
tryptophan residues adjacent to the active site, where the latter
is probably associated with an electron transfer function. This particular
conservation of tryptophans is also observed in CBP21 chitin oxidases,
as previously noted by Vaaje-Kolstad et al.[19]Active
site conserved residues in CBM33 depicting the occlusion
of Cu(II) axial coordination sites by alanine 123 and phenylalanine
196. Sections of the sequence alignment with two other CBM33s (B.a
= Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, S.m = Serratia marcescens, and E.f = Enterococcus
faecalis)[19,23] are shown surrounding
each of the active site residues, which are shown in bold. Their associated
percentage identities from the full sequence alignment shown in Figure S6 are indicated by the histograms below
the sequences according to the key.An unusual feature in CBM33 is observed in the strict conservation
of an alanine residue at position 123 at the end of a β strand.
The methyl group of thisalanine is close to the apical coordination
site on the copper ion (Cu···C = 3.9 Å), thereby
providing a degree of steric congestion at this coordination site.
What makes this feature notable is that the opposite apical site is
occupied by a highly conserved phenylalanineside chain (position
196), which has a near “end-on” aspect to the copper
ion with a closest Cu···C distance of 3.7 Å (Figure 7). The combination of the alanine and phenylalanine
suggests that coordination to the copper in CBM33 is restricted to
equatorial sites only (Figure 7). This is in
sharp contrast to GH61 where the apical sites are occupied by the
oxygen atoms of a tyrosine/ate and a water molecule, where the water
molecule could be replaced by either substrate or an oxygen molecule,
as suggested by Li et al.[21] Whatever the
reasons for the differences between CBM33 and GH61, the contrasting
arrangement of amino acid side chains in the copper ions’ secondary
coordination spheres, including that of the τ-N-methylated N-terminal
histidine in GH61, is indicative of different mechanisms of action
between the two enzymes.
Figure 7
Active
site conserved residues in CBM33 depicting the occlusion
of Cu(II) axial coordination sites by alanine 123 and phenylalanine
196. Sections of the sequence alignment with two other CBM33s (B.a
= Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, S.m = Serratia marcescens, and E.f = Enterococcus
faecalis)[19,23] are shown surrounding
each of the active site residues, which are shown in bold. Their associated
percentage identities from the full sequence alignment shown in Figure S6 are indicated by the histograms below
the sequences according to the key.
Binding face of BaCBM33 indicating
conserved residues.
Region colored red is copper active site, which is surrounded by highly
conserved regions consisting of residues capable of forming hydrogen
bonds with substrate. L2 loop region is to bottom right of figure,
showing no noticeable conservation, in contrast to type 2 PMOs (GH61s),
which exhibit conservation of some aromatic residues.[21]In a further indication of alternative
mechanisms, the conserved
residues on the binding face of CBM33 differ from that of GH61s. In
the former, the principal conservation pattern is found in amino acid
side chains, which can engage in hydrogen-bond interactions with a
polysaccharide substrate. These residues lie in two areas immediately
adjacent to the copper active site. The two regions lie on opposite
sides of the copper ion, thus providing an environment that likely
directs a specific orientation of the substrate with respect to the
copper and thus any reactive oxygen species generated at the active
site. Such a directed interaction with the substrate is in accordance
with the observation that CBM33s react principally at the C1 site
of β-linked polysaccharides; it may also offer an explanation
as to why only even-numbered oligosaccharidesare produced by CBM33
insofar as the up–down–up–down orientation pattern
of individual glycoside units within chitin and cellulose will only
project C–H bonds (from C–1) toward the enzyme binding
face every other glycosidic unit, as first suggested by Vaaje-Kolstad
et al.[19,23]GH61s appear to bind to substrate
through multiple aromatic–carbohydrate
interactions. This was shown by Li et al., who identified conserved
tyrosine residues on the α-helical L2 loop in polysaccharideoxygenases and also on residues near the copper active site (Figure 8).[21] The residues are
not only in different positions on the binding face when compared
to CBM33s, but also probably interact with the cellulose substrate
in a somewhat less directional way than the potential hydrogen-bonding
interactions seen in CBM33. This is commensurate with a wider range
of oxidation sites on cellulose that is observed with GH61 oxidative
action, especially type 3 PMOs,[21] and that
oxidation does not only occur at the exposed C1–H bonds on
cellulose, as appears to be the case in CBM33.
Figure 8
Binding face of BaCBM33 indicating
conserved residues.
Region colored red is copper active site, which is surrounded by highly
conserved regions consisting of residues capable of forming hydrogen
bonds with substrate. L2 loop region is to bottom right of figure,
showing no noticeable conservation, in contrast to type 2 PMOs (GH61s),
which exhibit conservation of some aromatic residues.[21]
It is not possible
to be more definitive about the conservation
differences between CBM33 and GH61 because we are unable to rule out
the possibility of post-translational modifications on CBM33, which
could introduce extra functionality at the active site, for instance,
oxidation of phenylalanine to tyrosine and potential methylation of
the N-terminal histidine. Indeed, we observe here that one CBM33 sequence
naturally has a tyrosine in place of phenylalanine 196. Nor can we
completely rule out a coordinative role for a highly conserved tyrosine
at position 197, although note that this appears to be unlikely given
the large structural disruption this would entail and the absence
of any conformational flexibility in this region as observed across
several sets of deposited coordinates. Additionally, an interrogation
of the CAZy database shows that GH61s can appear as multidomain proteins
in which the oxygenase domain is fused to other known cellulose-binding
modules (e.g., CBM1) through which binding to cellulose will be significantly
affected.[45] Similarly, CBM33 enzymes are
often appended to diverse other protein modules involved in hydrolysis
and binding of carbohydrates, as reviewed recently by Horn et al.[4] Notwithstanding these caveats, however, a structural
basis for the known differences in mechanisms of action of CBM33s
and GH61s does emerge without the need to introduce significant post-translational
modifications in CBM33s, and may well therefore be a reliable basis
for understanding differences in reactivity.
Conclusions
We have demonstrated that a CBM33 from Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens binds copper(II) with a Kd ≈ 6 nM. This binding significantly
stabilizes the enzyme, probably reflecting the increased formation
of a folded state of the protein backbone. From X-band EPR spectroscopy
and azide binding studies, we can infer that Cu-BaCBM33 is a mononuclear type 2 copper enzyme, but where the copper(II)
ion has a distorted axial geometry, possibly a distorted square planar
configuration akin to that seen in structure of Cu–Znsuperoxide
dismutase. XANES spectroscopy demonstrates that the copper is susceptible
to reduction and is readily photoreduced by X-rays both in solution
and in the solid state to the copper(I) form, an observation supported
by the high redox potential of Cu-BaCBM33. (Very
recently, structures of a CBM33 from Enterococcus faecalis were released on the pdb, the deposition titles of which imply a
similar photoreduction of copper when coordinated by the histidine
brace; pdb codes: 4alr, 4als, 4alt, 4alq, 4ale, 4alc. Currently, no further
publication accompanies the release of these coordinates.) Single-crystal
X-ray diffraction shows that the enzyme adopts an active site structure,
which has broad parallels with that reported for Cu-GH61s. The copper(I)histidine brace coordination geometry in Cu-BaCBM33
is T-shaped N3, corroborated by XANES studies that show
a 1s to nonbonded 4p transition characteristic of low coordination
number copper(I) species. Differences in the secondary coordination
sphere of the copper ion in CBM33s and GH61sare suggestive of a different
mechanism of action in the two classes of enzymes, but a fuller understanding
of the mechanism awaits in-depth and detailed reaction studies on
the enzymes and their associated small molecule model complexes.
Experimental Procedures
Expression
and Purification of BaCBM33
The coding sequence
of Bacillus amyloliquefaciensCBM33
(NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_014551.1) from nucleotide 82 to 621
was codon optimized for expression in Escherichia coli, synthesized with a pelB leader sequence to direct the protein to
the periplasm, and cloned into the pET-11a vector, by GenScript. The
resulting pET11a-BaCBM33 construct was used to transform BL21 (DE3) E. coli, which were grown from a single colony in
six 500 mL LB cultures to an A600 of 0.4
at 37 °C shaking at 180 rpm. The temperature was then reduced
to 16 °C, and the cells were allowed to grow further to an A600 of 0.6–0.8 when expression was induced
by the addition of IPTG to a final concentration of 1 mM. The cultures
were left overnight before the cells were harvested by centrifugation
at 11 000g for 30 min at 4 °C.Cells were immediately resuspended in 5 volumes of ice cold resuspension
buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl, 20% w/v sucrose). To isolate
the periplasmic fraction, 40 μg of hen egg white lysozyme (Sigma-Aldrich)
was added for every gram of cell paste and left on ice for 1 h. 60
μL of 1 M MgSO4 was then added per gram of cell paste,
and the suspension was incubated for a further 20 min on ice. Cell
debris was then removed by centrifugation at 10 000g, 4 °C for 10 min, and the supernatant containing
the periplasmic fraction was removed into a fresh tube. This was diluted
4 fold with buffer A (50 mM Tris pH 8.0) and passed through a 5 mL
HiTrap Q Sepharose column equilibrated in the same buffer collecting
the flow through. The column was then stripped with 100% buffer B
(50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 2 M NaCl). BaCBM33 did not bind to the column
and was present in the flow through, which was precipitated by the
addition of solid ammonium sulfate to a final concentration of 3.5
M and left stirring overnight at 4 °C. The protein was then isolated
by centrifugation at 38 000g for 30 min, the
supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was dissolved in 10 volumes
of buffer C (20 mM sodium acetate pH 5.0, 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA).
The protein was then concentrated to less than 10 mL and applied to
a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 75 column equilibrated in GF buffer (20 mM
sodium acetate pH 5.0, 250 mM NaCl). Peak fractions containing pure
BaCBM33 were pooled and concentrated using a Sartorius 10 kDa cut
off concentrator at 4000g. Protein concentrations
for all subsequent experiments were determined by measuring the A280 using an extinction coefficient of 44 920
M–1 cm–1 and a molecular weight
of 19 821 Da.
Redox Potential Measurements
The
redox indicator dyes
thionine, tetramethylphenylenediamine (TMP), and 2,6-dichloro-phenolindophenol
(DCPIP) were purchased from Sigma. A three-electrode setup was used
to determine accurately the reduction potential of the redox indicators
and potassium ferricyanide in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 5.
A stationary Pt disc working electrode (BASi), a Pt wire counter electrode,
and a saturated calomel reference electrode (SLS) were all placed
into an all-glass electrochemical cell. Cyclic voltammograms (50 mV
s–1) were measured for 1 mM solutions of each of
the redox compounds under a flow of Ar. A correction factor of ESHE= ESCE + 0.241
V was used. The resultant scans are shown in Figure
S7. The anodic and cathodic peak potentials, as determined
by the electrochemical software (Epsilon BASi), were averaged to give
the midpoint reduction potentials, summarized in Table S2. To judge if the dye could reduce BaCBM33, up to 10 μL of approximately 0.5 mM enzyme was injected
into a suba-sealed cuvette containing 150 μL of reduced dye
solution (absorbance <0.2 AU) and a small stirrer bar. Following
2 min of stirring, any resulting color changes were monitored using
UV–vis spectroscopy. Control experiments were conducted with
injection of buffer instead of enzyme, and it was confirmed that CBM33
was required to oxidize thionine or TMP in the cuvette.
EPR Spectroscopy
Continuous wave X-band frozen solution
EPR spectra of 0.5 mM solution of Cu(II)-BaCBM33 (15% v/v glycerol)
at pH 5 (acetate buffer) and 155 K were acquired on a Bruker ESP 300
spectrometer operating at 9.072 or 9.35 GHz, with a modulation amplitude
of 4G and microwave power of 5 mW. Spectra were referenced against
DPPH. Spectral simulation was carried out using Easyspin 4.0.0 on
a desktop PC. Simulation parameters were as follows: g = 2.075, g = 2.086, g = 2.255; |A|
= 39, |A| = 90, |A| = 125 G. Strain: A = 210, A = 210, A = 210 G. Linewidth: 40 G (Gaussian), 40 G (Lorentzian). g and |A| were determined accurately from the two
absorptions at low field where it was assumed that these absorptions
were separated from other aspects of the absorption envelope. It was
assumed that g and A tensors were
axially coincident. Accurate determination of the g, g, |A|, and |A| was not possible due to
the second-order nature of the perpendicular region and the significant
level of conformational heterogeneity, although it was noted that
satisfactory simulation could only be achieved with one particular
set of spin Hamiltonian values.
Solution XANES Spectroscopy
XANES spectroscopy data
were collected on a 0.6 mM solution of Cu(II)-BaCBM33 at pH 5, which
had been flash-frozen to 77 K (0.7 mM BaCBM33 was prepared in 20 mM
sodium acetate pH 5.0, 250 mM NaCl to which Cu(NO3)2·3H2O was added to a final concentration of
0.6 mM; to produce a Cu(I) sample, ascorbate was added to a final
concentration of 10 mM). Data were acquired on the sample at 90 K
at the B18 Core Spectroscopy beamline at Diamond Light Source, Oxfordshire,
UK. At the time of the measurement, the Diamond synchrotron was operating
at a ring energy of 3 GeV in a 10 min top-up mode for a ring current
of 301 mA. The beamline was equipped with a Si(111) double crystal
monochromator, and harmonic rejection was achieved through the use
of two Pt-coated mirrors operating at an incidence angle of 9 mrad.
The monochromator was calibrated using the first maximum in the derivative
in the edge region of the XAS spectra of a copper foil placed between
the second and third ion chambers at 8979 eV. Estimated flux of beam
at 8 keV = 5 × 1011 ph/s. Data were collected in fluorescence
from 8779 to 9020 eV using a nine-channel Ge solid-state detector
at the copper K absorption edge (∼8980 eV) in 1 eV steps. The
sample was contained in a 5 mm light path PTFE 400 μL cell with
25 μm thick windows made from Kapton foil. The measurements
were made at 90 K. The incident beam intensity was measured using
a 30 cm ion chamber optimized using a helium–nitrogen gas mixture
to absorb 30% and 70% of the beam in I0, respectively.
XANES Data
Collection in the Crystal
X-ray fluorescence
scans were performed on crystals, which had not previously been exposed
to X-rays on station I03 of Diamond Light Source, using a Vortex multicathode,
single element detector. Crystals from copper cocrystallizations,
as grown for the structure determination, were washed through three
drops of cryo-protectant solution to remove excess copper prior to
plunging in liquid nitrogen. To produce Cu(I) control samples, 20
mM ascorbate was included in the cryo-protectant soaking solution.
Fluorescence scans were performed across the copper K-edge from 8942
to 9017 eV with step sizes of 5 eV from 8942 to 8962 eV, 0.5 eV across
the edge from 8962 to 8997 eV, and 5 eV from 8997 to 9017 eV.
Isothermal
Titration Calorimetry
Isothermal titration
calorimetry was performed using a VP-ITC calorimeter (MicroCal). Typically
protein was present in the cell between 10 and 120 μM with a
10-fold more concentrated solution of CuCl2 in the syringe.
Titrations were initially performed at 283 K, but the same results
could later be obtained at 298 K also. After an initial 2 μL
injection, which is discarded in the data analysis, 10 μL injections
were used during the titration with a 5 min interval between each
injection at pH 5.0 and 6.0 and 8 min intervals at pH 7.0 where binding
was slower. The buffers used during the titrations were either 20
mM sodium acetate pH 5.0, 250 mM NaCl, 20 mM Bis-Tris pH 6.0, 250
mM NaCl, or 20 mM Bis-Tris pH 7.0, 250 mM NaCl with the CuCl2 solution prepared in exactly the same buffer. All data were analyzed
using the Origin 7 software package (MicroCal). Heats of dilution
were subtracted from the data, but the analysis routinely returned
a substoichiometric binding of Cu. Modification of the injection system
to remove Cu-containing brass components improved the stoichiometries,
but these rarely exceeded 0.86. This is likely due to a portion of
the protein having acquired Cu2+ given the very high affinity
of the interaction from the glassware. To give meaningful ΔH values (the KDs are unaffected),
the protein concentration was therefore adjusted in the software to
reflect the 1:1 stoichiometry of copper to protein seen in the crystal
structure.
Differential Scanning Fluorimetry
Differential scanning
fluorimetry was used to determine the melting temperature of BaCBM33 with and without metal ions. Stability measurements
were performed using an Agilent MX3000P QPCR machine and the fluorescent
dye SYPRO orange (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted 2000 fold from the stock
solution. Fluorescence was measured with excitation and emission wavelengths
of 517 and 585 nm, respectively. All experiments were performed in
20 mM sodium acetate pH 5, 250 mM NaCl with protein at 25 μM,
and a total volume of 30 μL. Fluorescence was monitored while
increasing the temperature in steps of 1 °C at 30 s intervals
from 25 to 96 °C. The fluorescence was significantly quenched
in the presence of copper, but a melting curve could still be obtained.
Melting temperatures (Tm) were calculated
by fitting a sigmoidal curve to the data using the MTSA[46] program for MATLAB.
Crystallization of Apo and Cu-Bound BaCBM33
To form the Cu complex,
Cu(NO3)2·3H2O was added to the
protein to a final concentration of 1 mM. Apo and
Cu cocrystallization trials were then set up in
parallel with a protein concentration of 7 mg/mL using a Mosquito
robot (TTP Labtech). The best crystals in both cases were obtained
in condition D1 of the PACT screen (Qiagen): 0.1 M MMT buffer pH 4.0,
25% PEG-1500. Crystals were used directly from these initial screens
for subsequent data collection. Crystals used to determine the Cu-bound/ascorbate
soaked structure were cocrystallized with copper in the same way as
described above.
Diffraction Data Collection, Processing,
and Structure Determination
Crystals were cryo-cooled for
data collection by first soaking
for 30 s in mother liquor supplemented with 20% v/v ethylene glycol
before plunging directly in liquid nitrogen. For the ascorbate soak,
20 mM sodium ascorbate was included in the cryo-protectant. Diffraction
data were collected at Diamond Light Source, beamlines I04-1 and I03
at wavelengths of 0.917 and 0.976 Å, respectively. Data were
indexed and integrated using XDS[47] with
subsequent processing performed using the CCP4 software package.[48] The Serratia marcescens CBP21 structure (pdb 2ben)[49] was prepared as a molecular
replacement search model using CHAINSAW,[50] cutting back side chains to their nearest common atom. The Apo and Cu-bound structures were initially determined by
molecular replacement using PHASER,[51] both
containing two molecules in the asymmetric unit. Following structure
solution, pseudotranslational symmetry was detected in the apo-BaCBM33 data. The structure was therefore solved again
using MOLREP inputting the pseudo translation vector 0.500, 0.000,
0.127 for the off-origin Patterson peak. ARPwARP[52] was then used to rebuild the initial models before subsequent
manual building and refinement using COOT[53] and REFMAC5,[54] respectively. Local NCS
restraints were applied using the automatic NCS option in REFMAC5.
The ascorbate soaked crystals were isomorphous to the copper-free
crystals, and so the copper-free structure was simply refined against
these data, with waters and flexible loops removed, to yield the structure.
This was rebuilt and refined with COOT and REFMAC5 as for the others.
All data processing and refinement statistics can be found in Table S1. Coordinates and accompanying structure
factors for the apo-, Cu-bound, and Cu-bound/ascorbate
soaked enzyme have been deposited in the protein data bank with accession
codes 2YOW, 2YOX, and 2YOY, respectively.
Authors: Zarah Forsberg; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Bjørge Westereng; Anne C Bunæs; Yngve Stenstrøm; Alasdair MacKenzie; Morten Sørlie; Svein J Horn; Vincent G H Eijsink Journal: Protein Sci Date: 2011-08-08 Impact factor: 6.725
Authors: James A Langston; Tarana Shaghasi; Eric Abbate; Feng Xu; Elena Vlasenko; Matt D Sweeney Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Christoph Sygmund; Daniel Kracher; Stefan Scheiblbrandner; Kawah Zahma; Alfons K G Felice; Wolfgang Harreither; Roman Kittl; Roland Ludwig Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: R Jason Quinlan; Matt D Sweeney; Leila Lo Leggio; Harm Otten; Jens-Christian N Poulsen; Katja Salomon Johansen; Kristian B R M Krogh; Christian Isak Jørgensen; Morten Tovborg; Annika Anthonsen; Theodora Tryfona; Clive P Walter; Paul Dupree; Feng Xu; Gideon J Davies; Paul H Walton Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Igor Yakovlev; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Ari M Hietala; Emil Stefańczyk; Halvor Solheim; Carl Gunnar Fossdal Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Anna S Borisova; Trine Isaksen; Maria Dimarogona; Abhishek A Kognole; Geir Mathiesen; Anikó Várnai; Åsmund K Røhr; Christina M Payne; Morten Sørlie; Mats Sandgren; Vincent G H Eijsink Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Elaine Chiu; Marcel Hijnen; Richard D Bunker; Marion Boudes; Chitra Rajendran; Kaheina Aizel; Vincent Oliéric; Clemens Schulze-Briese; Wataru Mitsuhashi; Vivienne Young; Vernon K Ward; Max Bergoin; Peter Metcalf; Fasséli Coulibaly Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Zarah Forsberg; Alasdair K Mackenzie; Morten Sørlie; Åsmund K Røhr; Ronny Helland; Andrew S Arvai; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Vincent G H Eijsink Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Zarah Forsberg; Bastien Bissaro; Jonathan Gullesen; Bjørn Dalhus; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Vincent G H Eijsink Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2017-12-08 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Zarah Forsberg; Cassandra E Nelson; Bjørn Dalhus; Sophanit Mekasha; Jennifer S M Loose; Lucy I Crouch; Åsmund K Røhr; Jeffrey G Gardner; Vincent G H Eijsink; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Amanda K Chaplin; Michael T Wilson; Michael A Hough; Dimitri A Svistunenko; Glyn R Hemsworth; Paul H Walton; Erik Vijgenboom; Jonathan A R Worrall Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Seonah Kim; Jerry Ståhlberg; Mats Sandgren; Robert S Paton; Gregg T Beckham Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 11.205