Literature DB >> 22729546

Characterization of the two Neurospora crassa cellobiose dehydrogenases and their connection to oxidative cellulose degradation.

Christoph Sygmund1, Daniel Kracher, Stefan Scheiblbrandner, Kawah Zahma, Alfons K G Felice, Wolfgang Harreither, Roman Kittl, Roland Ludwig.   

Abstract

The genome of Neurospora crassa encodes two different cellobiose dehydrogenases (CDHs) with a sequence identity of only 53%. So far, only CDH IIA, which is induced during growth on cellulose and features a C-terminal carbohydrate binding module (CBM), was detected in the secretome of N. crassa and preliminarily characterized. CDH IIB is not significantly upregulated during growth on cellulosic material and lacks a CBM. Since CDH IIB could not be identified in the secretome, both CDHs were recombinantly produced in Pichia pastoris. With the cytochrome domain-dependent one-electron acceptor cytochrome c, CDH IIA has a narrower and more acidic pH optimum than CDH IIB. Interestingly, the catalytic efficiencies of both CDHs for carbohydrates are rather similar, but CDH IIA exhibits 4- to 5-times-higher apparent catalytic constants (k(cat) and K(m) values) than CDH IIB for most tested carbohydrates. A third major difference is the 65-mV-lower redox potential of the heme b cofactor in the cytochrome domain of CDH IIA than CDH IIB. To study the interaction with a member of the glycoside hydrolase 61 family, the copper-dependent polysaccharide monooxygenase GH61-3 (NCU02916) from N. crassa was expressed in P. pastoris. A pH-dependent electron transfer from both CDHs via their cytochrome domains to GH61-3 was observed. The different properties of CDH IIA and CDH IIB and their effect on interactions with GH61-3 are discussed in regard to the proposed in vivo function of the CDH/GH61 enzyme system in oxidative cellulose hydrolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22729546      PMCID: PMC3416632          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01503-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  37 in total

1.  Cellulase of Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  B M Eberhart; R S Beck; K M Goolsby
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  A third generation glucose biosensor based on cellobiose dehydrogenase from Corynascus thermophilus and single-walled carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Federico Tasca; Muhammad Nadeem Zafar; Wolfgang Harreither; Gilbert Nöll; Roland Ludwig; Lo Gorton
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.616

3.  Substrate specificity of cellobiose dehydrogenase from Phanerochaete chrysosporium.

Authors:  G Henriksson; V Sild; I J Szabó; G Pettersson; G Johansson
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1998-03-03

4.  Deciphering transcriptional regulatory mechanisms associated with hemicellulose degradation in Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  Jianping Sun; Chaoguang Tian; Spencer Diamond; N Louise Glass
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2012-02-17

5.  Characterization of Toxoplasma gondii surface antigen 1 (SAG1) secreted from Pichia pastoris: evidence of hyper O-glycosylation.

Authors:  O Letourneur; G Gervasi; S Gaïa; J Pagès; B Watelet; M Jolivet
Journal:  Biotechnol Appl Biochem       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  The cellulase complex of Neurospora crassa: activity, stability and release.

Authors:  M T Yazdi; J R Woodward; A Radford
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1990-07

7.  Ancestral gene fusion in cellobiose dehydrogenases reflects a specific evolution of GMC oxidoreductases in fungi.

Authors:  Marcel Zámocký; Martin Hallberg; Roland Ludwig; Christina Divne; Dietmar Haltrich
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 3.688

8.  The first structure of a glycoside hydrolase family 61 member, Cel61B from Hypocrea jecorina, at 1.6 A resolution.

Authors:  Saeid Karkehabadi; Henrik Hansson; Steve Kim; Kathleen Piens; Colin Mitchinson; Mats Sandgren
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  The putative endoglucanase PcGH61D from Phanerochaete chrysosporium is a metal-dependent oxidative enzyme that cleaves cellulose.

Authors:  Bjørge Westereng; Takuya Ishida; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Miao Wu; Vincent G H Eijsink; Kiyohiko Igarashi; Masahiro Samejima; Jerry Ståhlberg; Svein J Horn; Mats Sandgren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Simple and efficient expression of Agaricus meleagris pyranose dehydrogenase in Pichia pastoris.

Authors:  Christoph Sygmund; Alexander Gutmann; Iris Krondorfer; Magdalena Kujawa; Anton Glieder; Beate Pscheidt; Dietmar Haltrich; Clemens Peterbauer; Roman Kittl
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  48 in total

1.  Recombinant Expression of Trichoderma reesei Cel61A in Pichia pastoris: Optimizing Yield and N-terminal Processing.

Authors:  Magali Tanghe; Barbara Danneels; Andrea Camattari; Anton Glieder; Isabel Vandenberghe; Bart Devreese; Ingeborg Stals; Tom Desmet
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Characterization of Cellobiose Dehydrogenase from a Biotechnologically Important Cerrena unicolor Strain.

Authors:  Justyna Sulej; Grzegorz Janusz; Monika Osińska-Jaroszuk; Patrycja Rachubik; Andrzej Mazur; Iwona Komaniecka; Adam Choma; Jerzy Rogalski
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.926

Review 3.  Plant-polysaccharide-degrading enzymes from Basidiomycetes.

Authors:  Johanna Rytioja; Kristiina Hildén; Jennifer Yuzon; Annele Hatakka; Ronald P de Vries; Miia R Mäkelä
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Structural and Functional Characterization of a Lytic Polysaccharide Monooxygenase with Broad Substrate Specificity.

Authors:  Anna S Borisova; Trine Isaksen; Maria Dimarogona; Abhishek A Kognole; Geir Mathiesen; Anikó Várnai; Åsmund K Røhr; Christina M Payne; Morten Sørlie; Mats Sandgren; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Studying direct electron transfer by site-directed immobilization of cellobiose dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Marta Meneghello; Firas A Al-Lolage; Su Ma; Roland Ludwig; Philip N Bartlett
Journal:  ChemElectroChem       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.590

Review 6.  Functional characterization of cellulose-degrading AA9 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases and their potential exploitation.

Authors:  Ruiqin Zhang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Inactivation of Cellobiose Dehydrogenases Modifies the Cellulose Degradation Mechanism of Podospora anserina.

Authors:  Narumon Tangthirasunun; David Navarro; Sona Garajova; Didier Chevret; Laetitia Chan Ho Tong; Valérie Gautier; Kevin D Hyde; Philippe Silar; Jean-Guy Berrin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Cellobiose dehydrogenase modified electrodes: advances by materials science and biochemical engineering.

Authors:  Roland Ludwig; Roberto Ortiz; Christopher Schulz; Wolfgang Harreither; Christoph Sygmund; Lo Gorton
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.142

9.  Cello-oligosaccharide oxidation reveals differences between two lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (family GH61) from Podospora anserina.

Authors:  Mathieu Bey; Simeng Zhou; Laetitia Poidevin; Bernard Henrissat; Pedro M Coutinho; Jean-Guy Berrin; Jean-Claude Sigoillot
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Oxygen Activation by Cu LPMOs in Recalcitrant Carbohydrate Polysaccharide Conversion to Monomer Sugars.

Authors:  Katlyn K Meier; Stephen M Jones; Thijs Kaper; Henrik Hansson; Martijn J Koetsier; Saeid Karkehabadi; Edward I Solomon; Mats Sandgren; Bradley Kelemen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.