Literature DB >> 23510798

Repeatability and internal consistency of abdominal 2D and 4D phase contrast MR flow measurements.

Andrew L Wentland1, Thomas M Grist, Oliver Wieben.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability and internal consistency of flow measurements in the renal arteries and pararenal aorta with the use of standard two-dimensional (2D) and novel four-dimensional (4D) phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers were imaged with a radially undersampled 4D PC technique centered over the renal arteries and with four 2D PC slices placed in the supra/infrarenal aorta and the left/right renal arteries; this MRI exam was performed twice on each subject. Flow measurements in all four vessels were computed from 2D and 4D PC data sets. Student's t-tests (P < .05) were used to assess differences between in-flow (suprarenal aorta) and out-flow (infrarenal aorta + left renal artery + right renal artery) for the 2D and 4D techniques, to compare in- and out-flow, and to compare repeated measurements of 2D and 4D flow measurements.
RESULTS: No significant differences were found in repeated measurements of 2D (P = .15) or 4D (P = .39) data. No significant difference was found between 2D (3.4 ± 2.8 mL/cardiac cycle) and 4D (3.5 ± 2.7 mL/cardiac cycle) in- and out-flow differences (P = .88). Out-flow was greater than in-flow for 2D measurements (P = .003); no difference was found for 4D measurements.
CONCLUSION: The 2D and 4D techniques demonstrated strong repeatability and internal consistency of flow measurements in the renal arteries and pararenal aorta.
Copyright © 2013 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23510798      PMCID: PMC3897393          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  19 in total

1.  Four-dimensional phase contrast MRI with accelerated dual velocity encoding.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Nett; Kevin M Johnson; Alex Frydrychowicz; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Eric Schrauben; Christopher J Francois; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography.

Authors:  Tianliang Gu; Frank R Korosec; Walter F Block; Sean B Fain; Quill Turk; Darren Lum; Yong Zhou; Thomas M Grist; Victor Haughton; Charles A Mistretta
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Renal blood flow measurements with use of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: normal values and reproducibility.

Authors:  Liesbeth Bax; Chris J G Bakker; Willemijn M Klein; Niels Blanken; Jaap J Beutler; Willem P T R M Mali
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Transstenotic pressure gradients: measurement in swine--retrospectively ECG-gated 3D phase-contrast MR angiography versus endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires.

Authors:  Darren P Lum; Kevin M Johnson; Russell K Paul; Aquilla S Turk; Daniel W Consigny; Julie R Grinde; Charles A Mistretta; Thomas M Grist
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Generation and visualization of four-dimensional MR angiography data using an undersampled 3-D projection trajectory.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Michael J Redmond; Ethan K Brodsky; Andrew L Alexander; Aiming Lu; Francis J Thornton; Michael J Schulte; Thomas M Grist; James G Pipe; Walter F Block
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters.

Authors:  A F Stalder; M F Russe; A Frydrychowicz; J Bock; J Hennig; M Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) and 3D phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (PC-MRA) velocity measurements: validation in an anatomically accurate cerebral artery aneurysm model with steady flow.

Authors:  Dorothea I Hollnagel; Paul E Summers; Spyros S Kollias; Dimos Poulikakos
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Frandics P Chan; Marcus T Alley; Kris L Wedding; Mary T Draney; Chris J Elkins; David W Parker; Ryan Wicker; Charles A Taylor; Robert J Herfkens; Norbert J Pelc
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Improved 3D phase contrast MRI with off-resonance corrected dual echo VIPR.

Authors:  Kevin M Johnson; Darren P Lum; Patrick A Turski; Walter F Block; Charles A Mistretta; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Time-resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: improved navigator-gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Andreas Harloff; Thorsten A Bley; Maxim Zaitsev; Bernd Jung; Ernst Weigang; Mathias Langer; Jürgen Hennig; Alex Frydrychowicz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Comparison of 4D flow and 2D velocity-encoded phase contrast MRI sequences for the evaluation of aortic hemodynamics.

Authors:  Emilie Bollache; Pim van Ooij; Alex Powell; James Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  In Vitro Assessment of Flow Variability in an Intracranial Aneurysm Model Using 4D Flow MRI and Tomographic PIV.

Authors:  Rafael Medero; Katrina Ruedinger; David Rutkowski; Kevin Johnson; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Regional hypoxic cerebral vasodilation facilitated by diameter changes primarily in anterior versus posterior circulation.

Authors:  J Mikhail Kellawan; John W Harrell; Alejandro Roldan-Alzate; Oliver Wieben; William G Schrage
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  K-t GRAPPA-accelerated 4D flow MRI of liver hemodynamics: influence of different acceleration factors on qualitative and quantitative assessment of blood flow.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic; Jury Fink; Jeremy D Collins; Edouard Semaan; Maximilian F Russe; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Mathias Langer; Bernd Jung
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 6.  4D flow imaging: current status to future clinical applications.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Susanne Schnell; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  MR assessment of abdominal circulation in Fontan physiology.

Authors:  Shi-Joon Yoo; Milan Prsa; Daryl Schantz; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Mike Seed; Tae Kyoung Kim; Rachel Wald; Rajiv Chaturvedi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Routine use of an aortic balloon to resolve possible inflow stenosis induced by the inflatable ring fixation mechanism of the Ovation endograft.

Authors:  Christos V Ioannou; Nikolaos Kontopodis; Efstratios Georgakarakos; Elias Kehagias; Eleni Metaxa; Stella Lioudaki; Yannis Papaharilaou; Dimitrios Tsetis
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Ventricular kinetic energy may provide a novel noninvasive way to assess ventricular performance in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Daniel Jeong; Petros V Anagnostopoulos; Alejandro Roldan-Alzate; Shardha Srinivasan; Mark L Schiebler; Oliver Wieben; Christopher J François
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Reproducibility of cerebrospinal venous blood flow and vessel anatomy with the use of phase contrast-vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction and contrast-enhanced MRA.

Authors:  E M Schrauben; K M Johnson; J Huston; A M Del Rio; S B Reeder; A Field; O Wieben
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.