PURPOSE: To validate a novel approach for accelerated four-dimensional phase contrast MR imaging (4D PC-MRI) with an extended range of velocity sensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4D PC-MRI data were acquired with a radially undersampled trajectory (PC-VIPR). A dual V(enc) (dV(enc) ) processing algorithm was implemented to investigate the potential for scan time savings while providing an improved velocity-to-noise ratio. Flow and velocity measurements were compared with a flow pump, conventional 2D PC MR, and single V(enc) 4D PC-MRI in the chest of 10 volunteers. RESULTS: Phantom measurements showed excellent agreement between accelerated dV(enc) 4D PC-MRI and the pump flow rate (R(2) ≥ 0.97) with a three-fold increase in measured velocity-to-noise ratio (VNR) and a 5% increase in scan time. In volunteers, reasonable agreement was found when combining 100% of data acquired with V(enc) = 80 cm/s and 25% of the high V(enc) data, providing the VNR of a 80 cm/s acquisition with a wider velocity range of 160 cm/s at the expense of a 25% longer scan. CONCLUSION: Accelerated dual V(enc) 4D PC-MRI was demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. This acquisition scheme is well suited for vascular territories with wide ranges of flow velocities such as congenital heart disease, the hepatic vasculature, and others.
PURPOSE: To validate a novel approach for accelerated four-dimensional phase contrast MR imaging (4D PC-MRI) with an extended range of velocity sensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4D PC-MRI data were acquired with a radially undersampled trajectory (PC-VIPR). A dual V(enc) (dV(enc) ) processing algorithm was implemented to investigate the potential for scan time savings while providing an improved velocity-to-noise ratio. Flow and velocity measurements were compared with a flow pump, conventional 2D PC MR, and single V(enc) 4D PC-MRI in the chest of 10 volunteers. RESULTS: Phantom measurements showed excellent agreement between accelerated dV(enc) 4D PC-MRI and the pump flow rate (R(2) ≥ 0.97) with a three-fold increase in measured velocity-to-noise ratio (VNR) and a 5% increase in scan time. In volunteers, reasonable agreement was found when combining 100% of data acquired with V(enc) = 80 cm/s and 25% of the high V(enc) data, providing the VNR of a 80 cm/s acquisition with a wider velocity range of 160 cm/s at the expense of a 25% longer scan. CONCLUSION: Accelerated dual V(enc) 4D PC-MRI was demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. This acquisition scheme is well suited for vascular territories with wide ranges of flow velocities such as congenital heart disease, the hepatic vasculature, and others.
Authors: H Arheden; C Holmqvist; U Thilen; K Hanséus; G Björkhem; O Pahlm; S Laurin; F Ståhlberg Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Andrew V Barger; Walter F Block; Yuriy Toropov; Thomas M Grist; Charles A Mistretta Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Tino Ebbers; Lars Wigström; Jan Engvall; Christian L Olin; Ann F Bolger Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Dana C Peters; Pratik Rohatgi; René M Botnar; Susan B Yeon; Kraig V Kissinger; Warren J Manning Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: P G Walker; G B Cranney; M B Scheidegger; G Waseleski; G M Pohost; A P Yoganathan Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1993 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: J F Debatin; R H Ting; H Wegmüller; F G Sommer; J O Fredrickson; T J Brosnan; B S Bowman; B D Myers; R J Herfkens; N J Pelc Journal: Radiology Date: 1994-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Susanne Schnell; Sameer A Ansari; Can Wu; Julio Garcia; Ian G Murphy; Ozair A Rahman; Amir A Rahsepar; Maria Aristova; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Eric Schrauben; Anders Wåhlin; Khalid Ambarki; Erik Spaak; Jan Malm; Oliver Wieben; Anders Eklund Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: C Wu; S A Ansari; A R Honarmand; P Vakil; M C Hurley; B R Bendok; J Carr; T J Carroll; M Markl Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Suhyung Park; Liyong Chen; Jennifer Townsend; Hyunyeol Lee; David A Feinberg Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Sean Callahan; Narayana S Singam; Michael Kendrick; M J Negahdar; Hui Wang; Marcus F Stoddard; Amir A Amini Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: A Wåhlin; K Ambarki; R Birgander; O Wieben; K M Johnson; J Malm; A Eklund Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 3.825