Literature DB >> 32524379

In Vitro Assessment of Flow Variability in an Intracranial Aneurysm Model Using 4D Flow MRI and Tomographic PIV.

Rafael Medero1,2, Katrina Ruedinger3,4, David Rutkowski1,2, Kevin Johnson5, Alejandro Roldán-Alzate6,7,8.   

Abstract

Aneurysm rupture has been suggested to be related to aneurysm geometry, morphology, and complex flow activity; therefore, understanding aneurysm-specific hemodynamics is crucial. 4D Flow MRI has been shown to be a feasible tool for assessing hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms with high spatial resolution. However, it requires averaging over multiple heartbeats and cannot account for cycle-to-cycle hemodynamics variations. This study aimed to assess cycle-to-cycle flow dynamics variations in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm model using tomographic particle image velocimetry (tomo-PIV) at a high image rate under pulsatile flow conditions. Time-resolved and time-averaged velocity flow fields within the aneurysm sac and estimations of wall shear stress (WSS) were compared with those from 4D Flow MRI. A one-way ANOVA showed a significant difference between cardiac cycles (p value < 0.0001); however, differences were not significant after PIV temporal and spatial resolution was matched to that of MRI (p value 0.9727). This comparison showed the spatial resolution to be the main contributor to assess cycle-to-cycle variability. Furthermore, the comparison with 4D Flow MRI between velocity components, streamlines, and estimated WSS showed good qualitative and quantitative agreement. This study showed the feasibility of patient-specific in-vitro experiments using tomo-PIV to assess 4D Flow MRI with high repeatability in the measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experimental validation; Hemodynamics; Intracranial aneurysm; Particle image velocimetry; Patient-specific; Phase-contrast MRI; Wall shear stress

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32524379      PMCID: PMC7821079          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02543-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  26 in total

1.  Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  P van Ooij; A Guédon; C Poelma; J Schneiders; M C M Rutten; H A Marquering; C B Majoie; E VanBavel; A J Nederveen
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  A feasibility study to evaluate splanchnic arterial and venous hemodynamics by flow-sensitive 4D MRI compared with Doppler ultrasound in patients with cirrhosis and controls.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic; Zoltan Csatari; Peter Deibert; Wulf Euringer; Bernd Jung; Wolfgang Kreisel; Julia Geiger; Maximilian F Russe; Mathias Langer; Michael Markl
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.566

3.  Understanding acceleration-induced displacement artifacts in phase-contrast MR velocity measurements.

Authors:  R Frayne; B K Rutt
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review.

Authors:  G J Rinkel; M Djibuti; A Algra; J van Gijn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Comparison of 4D Flow MRI and Particle Image Velocimetry Using an In Vitro Carotid Bifurcation Model.

Authors:  Rafael Medero; Carson Hoffman; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Fabrication of Low-Cost Patient-Specific Vascular Models for Particle Image Velocimetry.

Authors:  Katrina L Ruedinger; Rafael Medero; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.495

7.  Improved SNR in phase contrast velocimetry with five-point balanced flow encoding.

Authors:  Kevin M Johnson; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models.

Authors:  Matthew D Ford; Hristo N Nikolov; Jaques S Milner; Stephen P Lownie; Edwin M Demont; Wojciech Kalata; Francis Loth; David W Holdsworth; David A Steinman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Repeatability and internal consistency of abdominal 2D and 4D phase contrast MR flow measurements.

Authors:  Andrew L Wentland; Thomas M Grist; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 10.  4D flow imaging with MRI.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic; Bradley D Allen; Julio Garcia; Kelly B Jarvis; Michael Markl
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-04
View more
  10 in total

1.  Hemodynamic characteristics in a cerebral aneurysm model using non-Newtonian blood analogues.

Authors:  Hang Yi; Zifeng Yang; Mark Johnson; Luke Bramlage; Bryan Ludwig
Journal:  Phys Fluids (1994)       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.980

2.  Assessing the aneurysm occlusion efficacy of a shear-thinning biomaterial in a 3D-printed model.

Authors:  Grant Schroeder; Masoud Edalati; Gregory Tom; Nicole Kuntjoro; Mark Gutin; Melvin Gurian; Edoardo Cuniberto; Elisabeth Hirth; Alessia Martiri; Maria Teresa Sposato; Selda Aminzadeh; James Eichenbaum; Parvin Alizadeh; Avijit Baidya; Reihaneh Haghniaz; Rohollah Nasiri; Naoki Kaneko; Abraham Mansouri; Ali Khademhosseini; Amir Sheikhi
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2022-03-18

3.  Enhancement of cerebrovascular 4D flow MRI velocity fields using machine learning and computational fluid dynamics simulation data.

Authors:  David R Rutkowski; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Kevin M Johnson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Motion Analysis of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex by Using Ultrasonography Images: Preliminary Analysis.

Authors:  Issei Shinohara; Atsuyuki Inui; Yutaka Mifune; Hanako Nishimoto; Kohei Yamaura; Shintaro Mukohara; Tomoya Yoshikawa; Tatsuo Kato; Takahiro Furukawa; Yuichi Hoshino; Takehiko Matsushita; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  The Biofabrication of Diseased Artery In Vitro Models.

Authors:  Chen Pan; Qiqi Gao; Byoung-Soo Kim; Yafeng Han; Ge Gao
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.891

6.  Influence of Spatial Resolution and Compressed SENSE Acceleration Factor on Flow Quantification with 4D Flow MRI at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Mariya S Pravdivtseva; Franziska Gaidzik; Philipp Berg; Patricia Ulloa; Naomi Larsen; Olav Jansen; Jan-Bernd Hövener; Mona Salehi Ravesh
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 7.  Imaging Modalities for Intracranial Aneurysm: More Than Meets the Eye.

Authors:  Clémence Maupu; Héloïse Lebas; Yacine Boulaftali
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-15

8.  Hemodynamic Study of a Patient-Specific Intracranial Aneurysm: Comparative Assessment of Tomographic PIV, Stereoscopic PIV, In Vivo MRI and Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Authors:  Xiaolin Wu; Stefanie Gürzing; Christiaan Schinkel; Merel Toussaint; Romana Perinajová; Pim van Ooij; Saša Kenjereš
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 2.305

9.  Experimental Validation of Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (EMRI) Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).

Authors:  Giacomo Annio; Ryo Torii; Andrea Ducci; Vivek Muthurangu; Victor Tsang; Gaetano Burriesci
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Intracranial Flow Velocity Quantification Using Non-Contrast Four-Dimensional Flow MRI: A Prospective Comparative Study with Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound.

Authors:  Sam-Yeol Ha; Yeonah Kang; Ho-Joon Lee; Moonjung Hwang; Jiyeon Baik; Seongho Park
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.