Literature DB >> 18024452

Transstenotic pressure gradients: measurement in swine--retrospectively ECG-gated 3D phase-contrast MR angiography versus endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires.

Darren P Lum1, Kevin M Johnson, Russell K Paul, Aquilla S Turk, Daniel W Consigny, Julie R Grinde, Charles A Mistretta, Thomas M Grist.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the hypothesis that retrospectively electrocardiographically gated phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction (VIPR) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography data sets can be used to measure transstenotic pressure gradients (TSPGs) in vivo.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: TSPGs were calculated by using phase-contrast VIPR MR angiography data sets; measurements obtained with a pair of endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires served as a reference standard. With institutional animal care and use committee approval, 12 swine underwent surgical creation of stenoses at the left common carotid, right renal, and left external iliac arteries. The percentage stenosis and reference diameter of the lesions were calculated from conventional digital subtraction angiograms. A pair of 0.014-inch pressure-sensing guidewires was placed in tandem; sensors 1 cm distal and 1 cm proximal to the lesions measured the mean TSPG. Phase-contrast VIPR phase difference images were analyzed with an iterative technique based on the Navier-Stokes equations to determine the mean TSPG. Pearson product correlation was calculated, and Bland-Altman plots were generated to determine the degree of agreement between the two methods.
RESULTS: Twenty-one lesions (12 carotid, nine iliac; mean percentage stenosis, 52.4%; range, 29.8%-64.9%; mean reference diameter, 3.4 mm; range, 2.4-5.6 mm) were analyzed. For carotid and iliac lesions, phase-contrast VIPR and guidewire TSPG measurements were highly correlated (r = 0.952, P < .001). Bland-Altman plots (bias, 0.86 mm Hg; limits of agreement: -6.17 to 7.88 mm Hg) showed good agreement. Measurements in renal lesions (n = 9) were poorly correlated (r = -0.081, P = .835) and were excluded because of image degradation secondary to respiratory motion.
CONCLUSION: Phase-contrast MR angiography with VIPR enables reliable measurements of TSPG in carotid and iliac lesions that are comparable to those obtained with endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires. However, further work to compensate for respiratory motion is required to extend this technique to the renal arteries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18024452     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2453061946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  26 in total

1.  Renal arteries: isotropic, high-spatial-resolution, unenhanced MR angiography with three-dimensional radial phase contrast.

Authors:  Christopher J François; Darren P Lum; Kevin M Johnson; Benjamin R Landgraf; Thorsten A Bley; Scott B Reeder; Mark L Schiebler; Thomas M Grist; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  In vivo evaluation of quantitative MR angiography in a canine carotid artery stenosis model.

Authors:  M Calderon-Arnulphi; S Amin-Hanjani; A Alaraj; M Zhao; X Du; S Ruland; X J Zhou; K R Thulborn; F T Charbel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Fast 4D flow MRI re-emerges as a potential clinical tool for neuroradiology.

Authors:  P Turski; M Edjlali; C Oppenheim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Intracardiac flow visualization: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Daniel Rodriguez Muñoz; Michael Markl; José Luis Moya Mur; Alex Barker; Covadonga Fernández-Golfín; Patrizio Lancellotti; José Luis Zamorano Gómez
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Noninvasive assessment of transstenotic pressure gradients in porcine renal artery stenoses by using vastly undersampled phase-contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  Thorsten A Bley; Kevin M Johnson; Christopher J François; Scott B Reeder; Mark L Schiebler; Benjamin R Landgraf; Daniel Consigny; Thomas M Grist; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Sub-Nyquist acquisition and constrained reconstruction in time resolved angiography.

Authors:  Charles A Mistretta
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  4D flow imaging: current status to future clinical applications.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Susanne Schnell; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Effect of TIPS placement on portal and splanchnic arterial blood flow in 4-dimensional flow MRI.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic; Martin Rössle; Wulf Euringer; Michael Schultheiss; Riad Salem; Alex Barker; James Carr; Mathias Langer; Michael Markl; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  PC HYPR flow: a technique for rapid imaging of contrast dynamics.

Authors:  Julia V Velikina; Kevin M Johnson; Yijing Wu; Alexey A Samsonov; Patrick Turski; Charles A Mistretta
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.