Literature DB >> 23302868

How the bat got its buzz.

John M Ratcliffe1, Coen P H Elemans, Lasse Jakobsen, Annemarie Surlykke.   

Abstract

Since the discovery of echolocation in bats, the final phase of an attack on a flying insect, the 'terminal buzz', has proved enigmatic. During the buzz, bats increase information update rates by producing vocalizations up to 220 times s(-1). The buzz's ubiquity in hawking and trawling bats implies its importance for hunting success. Superfast muscles, previously unknown in mammals, are responsible for the extreme vocalization rate. Some bats produce a second phase-buzz II-defined by a large drop in the fundamental frequency (F(0)) of their calls. By doing so, bats broaden their acoustic field of view and should thereby reduce the likelihood of insect escape. We make the case that the buzz was a critical adaptation for capturing night-flying insects, and suggest that the drop in F(0) during buzz II requires novel, unidentified laryngeal mechanisms in order to counteract increasing muscle tension. Furthermore, we propose that buzz II represents a countermeasure against the evasive flight of eared prey in the evolutionary arms-race that saw the independent evolution of bat-detecting ears in various groups of night-flying insects.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23302868      PMCID: PMC3639754          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  8 in total

1.  Superfast muscles set maximum call rate in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Coen P H Elemans; Andrew F Mead; Lasse Jakobsen; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  An aerial-hawking bat uses stealth echolocation to counter moth hearing.

Authors:  Holger R Goerlitz; Hannah M ter Hofstede; Matt R K Zeale; Gareth Jones; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Vespertilionid bats control the width of their biosonar sound beam dynamically during prey pursuit.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A family matter: conclusive resolution of the taxonomic position of the long-fingered bats, miniopterus.

Authors:  Cassandra M Miller-Butterworth; William J Murphy; Stephen J O'Brien; David S Jacobs; Mark S Springer; Emma C Teeling
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-04-21       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Design and function of superfast muscles: new insights into the physiology of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Lawrence C Rome
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 19.318

6.  Breaking the trade-off: rainforest bats maximize bandwidth and repetition rate of echolocation calls as they approach prey.

Authors:  Daniela A Schmieder; Tigga Kingston; Rosli Hashim; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M B Fenton; M J O'Farrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Aerial hawking and landing: approach behaviour in Natterer's bats, Myotis nattereri (Kuhl 1818).

Authors:  Mariana L Melcón; Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.312

  8 in total
  19 in total

1.  Fast sensory-motor reactions in echolocating bats to sudden changes during the final buzz and prey intercept.

Authors:  Cornelia Geberl; Signe Brinkløv; Lutz Wiegrebe; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Clutter and conspecifics: a comparison of their influence on echolocation and flight behaviour in Daubenton's bat, Myotis daubentonii.

Authors:  Kayleigh Fawcett; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Dynamics of the echolocation beam during prey pursuit in aerial hawking bats.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Mads Nedergaard Olsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; David Plotkin; Juliette J Rubin; Nicholas T Homziak; Brian C Leavell; Peter R Houlihan; Krystie A Miner; Jesse W Breinholt; Brandt Quirk-Royal; Pablo Sebastián Padrón; Matias Nunez; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Range-dependent flexibility in the acoustic field of view of echolocating porpoises (Phocoena phocoena).

Authors:  Danuta M Wisniewska; John M Ratcliffe; Kristian Beedholm; Christian B Christensen; Mark Johnson; Jens C Koblitz; Magnus Wahlberg; Peter T Madsen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Timing matters: sonar call groups facilitate target localization in bats.

Authors:  Ninad B Kothari; Melville J Wohlgemuth; Katrine Hulgard; Annemarie Surlykke; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Sonar sound groups and increased terminal buzz duration reflect task complexity in hunting bats.

Authors:  Katrine Hulgard; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Intensity and directionality of bat echolocation signals.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Signe Brinkløv; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Ultrasonic predator-prey interactions in water-convergent evolution with insects and bats in air?

Authors:  Maria Wilson; Magnus Wahlberg; Annemarie Surlykke; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Sonar beam dynamics in leaf-nosed bats.

Authors:  Meike Linnenschmidt; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.