Literature DB >> 25552318

Clutter and conspecifics: a comparison of their influence on echolocation and flight behaviour in Daubenton's bat, Myotis daubentonii.

Kayleigh Fawcett1, John M Ratcliffe.   

Abstract

We compared the influence of conspecifics and clutter on echolocation and flight speed in the bat Myotis daubentonii. In a large room, actual pairs of bats exhibited greater disparity in peak frequency (PF), minimum frequency (F MIN) and call period compared to virtual pairs of bats, each flying alone. Greater inter-individual disparity in PF and F MIN may reduce acoustic interference and/or increase signal self-recognition in the presence of conspecifics. Bats flying alone in a smaller flight room, to simulate a more cluttered habitat as compared to the large flight room, produced calls of shorter duration and call period, lower intensity, and flew at lower speeds. In cluttered space, shorter call duration should reduce masking, while shorter call period equals more updates to the bat's auditory scene. Lower intensity likely reflects reduced range detection requirements, reduced speed the demands of flying in clutter. Our results show that some changes (e.g. PF separation) are associated with conspecifics, others with closed habitat (e.g. reduced call intensity). However, we demonstrate that call duration, period, and flight speed appear similarly influenced by conspecifics and clutter. We suggest that some changes reduce conspecific interference and/or improve self-recognition, while others demonstrate that bats experience each other like clutter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25552318     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-014-0977-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  18 in total

1.  Echolocation signals reflect niche differentiation in five sympatric congeneric bat species.

Authors:  Björn M Siemers; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast-echo ambiguity in clutter.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Mary E Bates; James A Simmons; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  What the bat's voice tells the bat's brain.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How the bat got its buzz.

Authors:  John M Ratcliffe; Coen P H Elemans; Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Automatic gain control in the bat's sonar receiver and the neuroethology of echolocation.

Authors:  S A Kick; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Stabilization of perceived echo amplitudes in echolocating bats. II. The acoustic behavior of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, when tracking moving prey.

Authors:  D J Hartley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency alternation and an offbeat rhythm indicate foraging behavior in the echolocating bat, Saccopteryx bilineata.

Authors:  John M Ratcliffe; Lasse Jakobsen; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Dynamics of jamming avoidance in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; M Brock Fenton; Asaf Tsoar; Carmi Korine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The acoustic advantage of hunting at low heights above water: behavioural experiments on the European 'trawling' bats Myotis capaccinii, M. dasycneme and M. daubentonii.

Authors:  B M Siemers; P Stilz; H U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Echolocating bats emit a highly directional sonar sound beam in the field.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Simon Boel Pedersen; Lasse Jakobsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  4 in total

1.  Echolocation in the bat, Rhinolophus capensis: the influence of clutter, conspecifics and prey on call design and intensity.

Authors:  Kayleigh Fawcett; David S Jacobs; Annemarie Surlykke; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.422

2.  The Sonar Model for Humpback Whale Song Revised.

Authors:  Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-16

3.  Sensorimotor Model of Obstacle Avoidance in Echolocating Bats.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Marc W Holderied; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Oilbirds produce echolocation signals beyond their best hearing range and adjust signal design to natural light conditions.

Authors:  Signe Brinkløv; Coen P H Elemans; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.963

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.